Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights LawDeference and Proportionality$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Andrew Legg

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199650453

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199650453.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 December 2017

Nature of the Right and Type of Case

Nature of the Right and Type of Case

Chapter:
(p.200) 8 Nature of the Right and Type of Case
Source:
The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law
Author(s):

Andrew Legg

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199650453.003.0008

It is often said that the nature of the right and the type of case are further factors for a margin of appreciation. This chapter explains that these matters are not in themselves grounds for deference but they do affect how much impact reasons for deference can have in the reasoning of the tribunals. In this way, they affect the reasoning of the margin of appreciation. It explores how different categories of rights will therefore demand more or less of reasons for a margin of appreciation. Absolute rights (life, prohibition of torture) give limited scope for the margin of appreciation; strong rights (fair trial, liberty, derogations) allow a little more scope for deference; qualified rights (privacy, freedoms of religion, assembly and speech, and non-discrimination) appear to anticipate a role for the margin of appreciation; and “weak” rights (property, education and free elections) give a wide measure of diversity to states.

Keywords:   nature of the right, type of case, absolute rights, life, torture, qualified rights, privacy, freedom of speech, property rights

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .