Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Compliance and the Enforcement of EU Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Marise Cremona

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199644735

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644735.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 April 2019

From the Velvet Glove to the Iron Fist: Criminal Sanctions for the Enforcement of Union Law

From the Velvet Glove to the Iron Fist: Criminal Sanctions for the Enforcement of Union Law

Chapter:
(p.74) 4 From the Velvet Glove to the Iron Fist: Criminal Sanctions for the Enforcement of Union Law
Source:
Compliance and the Enforcement of EU Law
Author(s):

Michael Dougan

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644735.003.0004

This chapter analyses the obligations concerning the enforcement of substantive Union policies by the member states within the national legal systems. The use of criminal penalties for the enforcement of substantive Union law arises in two main categories of situation. The first can usefully be termed the ‘velvet glove’: in the absence of Union legislation prescribing precise sanctions for its own enforcement, the member states are free to impose appropriate sanctions within their own legal systems — including penalties of a criminal nature — subject to various obligations imposed under Union law as interpreted by the Court in the famous Greek Maize ruling. In the second situation, the Union legislature positively requires the member states to criminalize certain infringements of Union law, and may even prescribe the detailed rules governing the imposition of liability and the type/level of sanction. That ‘iron fist’ can claim a constitutional provenance both more recent and more rumbustious than the Greek Maize jurisprudence: pre-Lisbon, bitter institutional disputes about whether criminal sanctions could or should be imposed under the First (or instead the Third) Pillar culminated in the Court's controversial rulings in the Environmental Crimes and Ship-Source Pollution cases; since 1 December 2009, the revised provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union have radically changed the relevant legal framework once again.

Keywords:   EU law, law enforcement, criminal penalties, sanctions, member states, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Greek Maize

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .