Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
EU Law after Lisbon$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Andrea Biondi, Piet Eeckhout, and Stefanie Ripley

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199644322

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644322.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 13 December 2018

Lawmaking after Lisbon

Lawmaking after Lisbon

Chapter:
(p.62) 3 Lawmaking after Lisbon
Source:
EU Law after Lisbon
Author(s):

Alexander H Turk

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644322.003.0003

The changes brought about by the Lisbon Treaty for lawmaking in the EU paradigmatically reflect the pragmatic approach of the drafters of the Lisbon Treaty to maintain the innovations of the (failed) Constitutional Treaty while avoiding its contentious use of constitutional language. The new hierarchy of norms between legislative and non-legislative acts, an innovation of the Constitutional Treaty, is realized in the Lisbon Treaty with the use of the traditional legal instruments of the Rome Treaties, rather than the allegedly controversial nomenclature of the Constitutional Treaty. The lawmaking design of the Union after Lisbon is therefore characterized by a mix of elements of the (old) Rome Treaties and a more ambitious constitutional design elaborated in the Constitutional Treaty. The shift in the institutional balance in favour of the European Parliament as a result of the new regime brings into sharper relief persistent doubts as to its legitimacy and therefore the legitimacy of the lawmaking process as a whole. In addition, it needs to be questioned whether certain new lawmaking features transplanted from national constitutions, such as the category of delegated legislation, to enhance democratic legitimacy in fact undermine the traditional forms of European lawmaking. And indeed many of the more unique, but also contentious, lawmaking features of the Union (open method of coordination, involvement of agencies or private parties in Union lawmaking), which have often developed in the shadow of any treaty provisions have been unaffected by the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty, but would perhaps have deserved greater attention.

Keywords:   lawmaking, developments, EU Law, Lisbon Treaty

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .