Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
EU Law after Lisbon$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Andrea Biondi, Piet Eeckhout, and Stefanie Ripley

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199644322

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644322.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 13 December 2018

From Laeken to Lisbon: The Origins and Negotiation of the Lisbon Treaty 1

From Laeken to Lisbon: The Origins and Negotiation of the Lisbon Treaty 1

Chapter:
(p.3) 1 From Laeken to Lisbon: The Origins and Negotiation of the Lisbon Treaty1
Source:
EU Law after Lisbon
Author(s):

Paul Berman

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644322.003.0001

The Lisbon Treaty has had one of the longest and most troubled histories of any EU treaty. This has left its mark on the Treaty's structure and content as well as giving rise to widely varying perceptions of its significance and effect. The Treaty continued an ever-accelerating period of treaty change beginning with the Single European Act. Its own origins lay in the Laeken Declaration and the concerns to make the enlarged EU fit for purpose to the meet the internal and international demands of the twenty-first century. The subsequent Convention, an innovation in itself, proposed establishing a new single Constitution, and EU, but foundered on the French and Dutch referendums. After a period of reflection, intensive negotiations produced a new treaty taking up many of the Constitution's proposals but abandoning the constitutional concept in favour of a classic, amending treaty. It also addressed specific concerns of Member States. Subsequent rejection in Ireland's referendum, as well as Czech concerns, required the negotiation of additional safeguards which have added to the Lisbon Treaty's complex, multi-layered character. Understanding Lisbon's negotiating history is therefore key to understanding the final text. Despite its difficult history, the Treaty can still be understood by reference to the original aims set out at Laeken. Equally this troubled history, and what it reveals about divergent visions of the EU and the difficulties of negotiating in an enlarged Union, makes it unlikely that there will be further significant treaty change in the foreseeable future.

Keywords:   Lisbon Treaty, EU treaty, Laeken Declaration, referendum, Single European Act

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .