Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Ethics of Capital Punishment$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Matthew H. Kramer

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199642182

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199642182.001.0001

Deterrence through Capital Punishment

Chapter:
(p. 19 ) 2 Deterrence through Capital Punishment
Source:
The Ethics of Capital Punishment
Author(s):

Matthew H. Kramer

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199642182.003.0002

This chapter first delineates the deterrence-oriented rationale for capital punishment, and defends it against some unwise objections. Thereafter, however, the chapter proceeds to assail the deterrence-oriented justification. Its critical remarks begin with some general reasons for doubting that the death penalty is indeed more effective in deterring people from committing serious crimes than are other severe sanctions. The chapter also highlights the inconclusiveness of the empirical studies that have purported to show the deterrent efficacy of the death penalty. Its main criticisms, however, are moral. It comprehensively criticizes the moral underpinnings of the deterrence-oriented rationale.

Keywords:   deterrence, morality, serious crimes, inconclusiveness

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .