Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Laws and Rules in Indo‐European$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Philomen Probert and Andreas Willi

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780199609925

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609925.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 August 2018

Older Runic evidence for North‐West Germanic a‐umlaut of u (and ‘the converse of Polivanov's Law’)

Older Runic evidence for North‐West Germanic a‐umlaut of u (and ‘the converse of Polivanov's Law’)

Chapter:
(p.43) 4 Older Runic evidence for North‐West Germanic a‐umlaut of u (and ‘the converse of Polivanov's Law’)
Source:
Laws and Rules in Indo‐European
Author(s):

Patrick Stiles

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609925.003.0004

The main structural effect of North-West-Germanic ‘a-umlaut’ — which involved shuffling the allophones of /i/, /e/ and /u/ depending on the following environment — was creation of the phoneme short /o/, split from Proto-Germanic /u/, as in Old High German gold “gold” beside guldīn “golden”. The standard view sees the change as an instance of secondary split, phonologized by the loss of one of the conditioning factors, short a, from final syllables, thus: nom. sg. */nistaz/ [nestaz] > /nest(z)/ “nest”. Up to then, the allophones were in complementary distribution. However, such forms in the Older Runic language (c.150 to 500 AD) as horna (Gallehus), worahto [= worahto] (Tune); holtijaR (Gallehus), dohtriR (Tune) call this account into question by showing the change with the supposed conditioning factors intact. The chapter seeks to explain this state of affairs, which is in apparent conflict with ‘Polivanov’s Law’, which states there is ‘no split without a merger, that is sound-changes that add to the inventory of phonemes are always triggered by a phonemic merger (including with zero, i.e. loss) elsewhere in the system.

Keywords:   Old Germanic languages, sound change, a-umlaut, phonologization, Older Runic, Prague School linguistics, PHONEMIC split, Polivanov’s Law 

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .