Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Ethics for Enemies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

F. M. Kamm

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199608782

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608782.001.0001

Reasons for Starting War: Goals, Conditions, and Proportionality

Chapter:
(p. 119 ) 3 Reasons for Starting War: Goals, Conditions, and Proportionality
Source:
Ethics for Enemies
Author(s):

F. M. Kamm

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608782.003.0004

Chapter 3 is, in part, concerned with whether having a proper intention is necessary in order to make starting war just and thus satisfy what is known as jus ad bellum. It goes on to consider a theoretical distinction, relevant to discussion of the Doctrine of Double Effect, between acting in order to bring about a good effect and acting on condition that one will bring it about. It examines whether the distinction bears on the permissibility of causing side effect harm to civilians (collateral damage) in war. The aim is to determine whether and how bad side effects can be proportional to the good effects of war, including achieving a just cause.

Keywords:   intention, jus ad bellum, conditions of action, civilians, collateral damage, proportionality, just cause, doctrine of double effect

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .