Finiteness and the verb
This chapter assesses the often‐asserted verbal character of finiteness. In the first place it illustrates that other lexical categories, such as noun and adjective, can constitute the finite element in a sentence. Moreover, sentences that apparently lack an appropriate predicator, such as copula‐less locatives and equatives, can be finite. And no appeal need be made to a deleted copula. In different languages all such sentences may lack a copula, in others only some, but it is again unnecessary and undesirable to invoke either copula deletion or insertion. In the second place, and following on from the preceding, the chapter looks at the tradition whereby finiteness is associated with the presence of particular, especially verbal, secondary syntactic categories. The inadequacy of this is illustrated in a discussion of the English ‘bare’ subjunctive. In conclusion there is outlined an analysis of the counterfactuality of the other English subjunctive, the one with an inflection.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.