Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Oxford Studies in MetaethicsVolume 6$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Russ Shafer-Landau

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199606375

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606375.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 January 2019

Parfit's Case against Subjectivism 1

Parfit's Case against Subjectivism 1

(p.52) 3 Parfit's Case against Subjectivism1
Oxford Studies in Metaethics

David Sobel

Oxford University Press

Derek Parfit, in On What Matters, argues that all subjective accounts of normative reasons for action are false. This chapter focuses on his “Agony Argument.” The first premise of the Agony Argument is that we necessarily have current reasons to avoid our own future agony. Its second premise is that subjective accounts cannot vindicate this fact. So, the argument concludes, subjective accounts must be rejected. This chapter accepts the first premise of this argument and that it is valid. The main thesis of this chapter is that subjectivists can account for our reasons to get pleasure and avoid agony. The chapter concludes that the Agony Argument does not justify the rejection of subjective accounts. The chapter also examines Parfit's understanding of the distinction between objective and subjective theories. The chapter claims Parfit offers a surprisingly narrow understanding of subjectivism such that even if his critique were successful, this would be bad news for fewer theories than we might have thought. Finally, the chapter replies to some possible worries about the arguments of this chapter.

Keywords:   Parfit, reasons, Subjectivism, desires, liking, Agony Argument, On What Matters, Reasons Transfer Principle

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .