Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Alejandro Chehtman

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199603404

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603404.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 September 2018

A Jurisdictional Theory of International Crimes

A Jurisdictional Theory of International Crimes

Chapter:
(p.87) 4 A Jurisdictional Theory of International Crimes
Source:
The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment
Author(s):

Alejandro Chehtman

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603404.003.0005

This chapter presents a jurisdictional theory of international crimes. It argues that the defining feature of the concept of an international crime is that it warrants conferring upon at least some extraterritorial authority the power to punish their perpetrators. It critically examines the leading arguments available in the literature, i.e., piracy-based explanations and the view of international crimes as harming humanity as a whole, and submits that they ultimately fail to account for their specific jurisdictional regime. This is mainly because these arguments are entirely unrelated to the reasons that justify meting out legal punishment to offenders in the first place. By contrast, the argument provided in Chapter 2 allows us to explain precisely this normative implication for standard cases of international crimes. The chapter also considers certain cases of war crimes and different varieties of terrorism to assess the explanatory potential of the view hereby endorsed. It concludes by examining the general objection put forward in the literature that a plausible theory of international criminal justice does not need an account of international crimes.

Keywords:   crimes against humanity, war crimes, piracy, international crimes, genocide, terrorism, state terrorism, jurisdiction, extraterritoriality

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .