Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Alejandro Chehtman

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199603404

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603404.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 September 2018

Rights, Individuals, and States

Rights, Individuals, and States

Chapter:
(p.8) 1 Rights, Individuals, and States
Source:
The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment
Author(s):

Alejandro Chehtman

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603404.003.0002

This chapter clarifies the moral methodology used in this book. It advocates a rights-based approach to address the topic of extraterritorial punishment. That is, it assumes that the issue of extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction can be adequately explored by considering whether and under what conditions we shall confer upon a particular body (or bodies) the right to punish a particular offender. This approach has two direct sources. On the one hand, it builds upon Wesley Hohfeld's classic distinction between different types of rights, and suggests that the right to punish is essentially a normative power. On the other hand, it draws heavily on a plausible version of the interest theory of rights. This rights-based approach concedes, however, that in order to confer upon a particular state or tribunal the right to punish an offender, it does not suffice to identify a particular interest sufficiently important to be protected by a right; we must also account for that specific body having the authority to exercise that right. Distinguishing these two separate arguments is crucial for the purposes of providing an analytically sound account of extraterritorial punishment, as it will be argued throughout the book. The chapter is also concerned with explaining the specific moral challenge presented by extraterritoriality. This normative challenge is closely associated with the principle of state sovereignty, and with the normative argument on which it rests. This book endorses a broad cosmopolitan position and advances an account of state sovereignty based on the interest of individuals living or belonging to a particular state. Under this particular framework, the main normative challenge is the fact that states enjoy a right to self-government which entails a prima facie (i.e., defeasible) immunity against extraterritorial bodies enforcing criminal prohibitions on its territory.

Keywords:   rights, Wesley Hohfeld, interest-based theories, authority, sovereignty, territorial integrity, self-government, cosmopolitanism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .