Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Participation in EU Rule-MakingA Rights-Based Approach$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Joana Mendes

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199599769

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599769.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 27 May 2018

Participation Rights in EU Administrative Rule‐making

Participation Rights in EU Administrative Rule‐making

Chapter:
(p.192) Chapter 5 Participation Rights in EU Administrative Rule‐making
Source:
Participation in EU Rule-Making
Author(s):

Joana Mendes

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599769.003.0005

Chapter 5 examines the Courts' approach to participation in rulemaking procedures analysing in depth the Courts' leading ruling on this matter (Atlanta). It argues that the different positions of the Court on the right to be heard in individual procedures, on the one hand, and rulemaking procedures, on the other, are grounded in the same premise: the preconception regarding the structure of the procedure characterised in Chapter 4. The reasons why the Courts excluded general acts from the realm of participation rights — representative democracy, institutional balance, and inaccurate classification of legal acts — are scrutinised and criticised. Furthermore, this chapter argues that the concept of participation rights adopted in the book may contribute to surmount the shortcomings of the Courts' approach. Finally, it analyses the possible impact of the modifications proposed on the scope of other procedural guarantees: access to information, the duty to state reasons, the duty of careful and impartial examination and language rights.

Keywords:   administrative rulemaking, representative democracy, institutional balance, classification of legal acts, normative acts, access to information, duty to state reasons, duty of care, language rights

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .