Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Thought in ActionExpertise and the Conscious Mind$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Barbara Gail Montero

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780199596775

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: June 2016

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596775.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 13 December 2017

Intuition, Rationality, and Chess Expertise

Intuition, Rationality, and Chess Expertise

Chapter:
(p.210) 11 Intuition, Rationality, and Chess Expertise
Source:
Thought in Action
Author(s):

Barbara Gail Montero

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596775.003.0012

What is the role of deliberation, rationality, and conceptualization in expert chess performance? Chess might seem to be an obvious counterexample to the idea that expert action proceeds without thought. However, Hubert Dreyfus has argued that because grandmaster chess players can play lightning chess (one minute per player) games so well without thinking, that the truly great moves of a chess player are neither rational nor conceptual but are, rather, directed by “forces on the board.” In contrast to Dreyfus’s view, this chapter presents an argument for the conceptual nature of chess perception as well as for the view that high-level chess players deliberate even during lightning chess. It also presents experimental results that conflict with the view, shared by both Dreyfus and John McDowell, that if chess players were to express their thoughts during a fast game, this would hinder their performance.

Keywords:   chess, deliberation, rationality, conceptualization, Dreyfus, McDowell, lightning chess, thought, perception, chess perception

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .