Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
New Spirits of Capitalism?Crises, Justifications, and Dynamics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Paul du Gay and Glenn Morgan

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199595341

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595341.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 April 2019

Notes on Aspects of the Conceptual Architecture of the ‘New Spirit’: Weber and Hirschman

Notes on Aspects of the Conceptual Architecture of the ‘New Spirit’: Weber and Hirschman

Chapter:
(p.82) Chapter 4 Notes on Aspects of the Conceptual Architecture of the ‘New Spirit’: Weber and Hirschman
Source:
New Spirits of Capitalism?
Author(s):

Paul du Gay

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595341.003.0004

This chapter focuses on certain aspects of the conceptual architecture of the New Spirit of Capitalism, namely the use made by Boltanski and Chiapello of the work of Max Weber and Albert Hirschman. Concentrating first upon the distinctive ‘Weberian’ sociological synthesis they elaborate, the chapter suggests that Boltanski and Chiapello inadvertently cut themselves off from perhaps the most consequential re-reading of Weber's work, including The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism, currently being undertaken in the humanities and social sciences. Second, the chapter focuses upon the use made by Boltanski and Chiapello of Albert Hirschman's The Passions and the Interests. The chapter argues that Hirschman's genealogy indicates that the problems that interest was designed to counteract are still with us; and, moreover, that they may well have intensified precisely because the neo-stoic conceptions of the ´self’ of self-interest he delineates, and the justification of the common good to which they were historically attached, have, under the sway of a romantic conception of the whole human being associated with the ‘artistic’ critique of ‘instrumental rationality’, given way to an ‘enriched’ metaphysical conception of personhood whose ‘agency’ is held to heed no artificial boundaries and whose ‘civilising’ effects are far from obvious. The critical possibilities that might be associated with a revived ‘neo-stoic’ conception of persona, and its association with the Weberian language of office (not least in its ‘statist’ Hobbesian variant), remain curiously unexplored by Boltanski and Chiapello, perhaps because they appear ‘anachronistic’ and out of step with the norms and ideals of the ‘projective city’.

Keywords:   Weber, Hirschman, office, persona, stoicism, interests, state

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .