Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Challenging Acts of International Organizations Before National Courts$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

August Reinisch

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199595297

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595297.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 March 2019

Domestic Court Reactions to UN Security Council Sanctions

Domestic Court Reactions to UN Security Council Sanctions

Chapter:
(p.54) 3 Domestic Court Reactions to UN Security Council Sanctions
Source:
Challenging Acts of International Organizations Before National Courts
Author(s):

Antonios Tzanakopoulos (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595297.003.0003

This chapter provides evidence that, while Kadi was an important decision, different perspectives on the underlying subject-matter were taken by various national courts. This is the due to the fact that increasingly, individuals blacklisted by the Security Council or otherwise affected by its decisions are trying to challenge such UN acts before national courts. In particular, the Swiss Supreme Court in Nada, the Canadian Federal Court in Abdelrazik, the Irish High Court in Bosphorus, the English High Court and ultimately the ECJ in the Othman case, as well as the English High Court and the UK Supreme Court in the Hay case provide evidence on national court decisions that rule on the scope of their power to review UN Security Council resolutions. In doing so, different forms of engagement methods can be distinguished, ranging from abstention, low intensity review, consistent interpretation to the annulment of the domestic measure, all confirming the working hypotheses.

Keywords:   domestic courts, UN Sanctions review, asset freezing, anti-terrorism measures, engagement methods, Nada case, Abdelrazik case, Bosphorus case, Othman case, Hay case

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .