Adjudication and Interpretation
Adjudication is the effort to resolve a dispute by determining, amid the clamour of rival claims, what is just. This chapter argues that the adjudicative question is always of this form: ‘In the case now being considered, what is due to whom?’ In adjudication, it is sometimes possible to discover what is intrinsically and in that sense naturally just, but sometimes what is just must be established by convention. The chapter also discusses evidence and impartiality and argues that audi alteram partem and nemo iudex in causa sua are intrinsic to the nature of adjudicative investigation. An interpretation is a text that expresses the interpreter's understanding of another text and the chapter addresses the processes of interpretation and reasonable judgement, which is not infallibility. The chapter brings together various aspects of the discussion by analysing the definition of a ‘refugee’ under the 1951 UN Refugee Convention.
Keywords: adjudication, adjudicative question, procedural justice, evidence, impartiality, interpretation, understanding, knowing, reasonable judgement, infallibility, refugee
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .