Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
ApraxiaThe Cognitive side of motor control$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Georg Goldenberg

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199591510

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591510.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 July 2018

High and low levels of action control

High and low levels of action control

(p.83) Chapter 5 High and low levels of action control
Oxford University Press

The excursion into history in previous chapters has revealed a basic dichotomy shining through many theoretical accounts of apraxia. It opposes a higher mental to a lower motor level of action control. This opposition is a leading threat to the review of modern theories and empirical evidence of apraxia. Application of the high versus low level dichotomy to apraxia opposes cognitive and motor aspects of manual actions.

Keywords:   mind–body dichotomy, cognition, physiology, motor control, history of neuroscience

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .