Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Understanding Counterfactuals, Understanding CausationIssues in Philosophy and Psychology$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack, and Sarah R. Beck

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199590698

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590698.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 October 2018

Counterfactual and Causal Thoughts about Exceptional Events

Counterfactual and Causal Thoughts about Exceptional Events

Chapter:
(p.208) 10 Counterfactual and Causal Thoughts about Exceptional Events
Source:
Understanding Counterfactuals, Understanding Causation
Author(s):

Ruth M.J. Byrne

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590698.003.0011

This chapter examines the counterfactual thoughts and causal explanations that people create for exceptional and unexpected antecedents and outcomes. Four questions have puzzled psychologists and philosophers interested in causation and counterfactuality: (1) How do counterfactual ‘if only’ thoughts affect causal thoughts? (2) How do causal thoughts affect counterfactual thoughts? (3) How do causal and counterfactual thoughts differ? And (4) How do semi-factual ‘even if’ thoughts affect causal thoughts? I sketch answers to these four questions based on two central claims. First, counterfactual thoughts require people to construct a mental representation of two possibilities, the counterfactual conjecture and the presupposed factual reality. Second, there are different sorts of causes: ‘strong’ causes are necessary and sufficient for their outcome; and ‘enabling’ causes are necessary but not sufficient for their outcome.

Keywords:   counterfactual conditional, exceptionality effect, semi-factual ‘even if’ thoughts, strong causes, enabling causes, reasoning, imagination

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .