Conservatism and Enhancement
This chapter explores the possibility that mainstream traditional conservative thought in the tradition of Edmund Burke provides a better vantage point from which to argue against the enhancement project, than the work of contemporary conservative bioethicists such as Fukuyama, Sandel, and Kass. It argues that mainstream traditional conservative thought provides no conclusive reasons against pursuing the enhancement project and—surprisingly—supplies a powerful reason in favor of pursuing it. A central conservative thesis is that human nature includes cognitive imperfections that doom efforts to achieve large-scale improvements in the human condition. This thesis speaks strongly in favor of enhancement, if these cognitive imperfections may be safely ameliorated through the use of biotechnologies. At present, there is no good reason to conclude that our cognitive imperfections are so severe as to rule out our significantly ameliorating them.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.