Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Language Change and Linguistic Theory, Volume I$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

D. Gary Miller

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199583423

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583423.001.0001

Inverted Operations

Chapter:
(p. 205 ) 7 Inverted Operations
Source:
Language Change and Linguistic Theory, Volume I
Author(s):

D. Gary Miller (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583423.003.0008

To avoid some token of speech perceived as negative by an emulated segment of the population, speakers alter proper forms in hypercorrection, e.g. pseudocorrective replacement, inversion. Alleged examples of the latter are drawn from non‐rhotic varieties of English and their histories. An inversion account is difficult because hypercorrection and limited generalization resulted in arbitrary constraints at a subsequent synchronic stage. Better examples of inverted operations are the loss and acquisition of segmental contrast (phonemicization). The latter generally correlates with lexicalization of contrast and can prompt lexical diffusion of a new phoneme. The flipside of these reversals of the effects of phonetic change is the regularization of an analogical or lexical diffusional change to make it more phonological.

Keywords:   phonemicization, lexical diffusion, regularization, inverted operations

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .