Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Religion and Public ReasonsCollected Essays Volume V$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John Finnis

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199580095

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580095.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 December 2017

Nuclear Deterrence and the End of Christendom

Nuclear Deterrence and the End of Christendom

Chapter:
(p.275) 20 Nuclear Deterrence and the End of Christendom
Source:
Religion and Public Reasons
Author(s):

John Finnis

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580095.003.0021

This chapter summarizes the main arguments in Finnis, Boyle, and Grisez, Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism (OUP 1987). No policy of nuclear deterrence of enemies equipped with comparable capabilities can fail to include the threat to ‘city swap’ (destroy enemy cities with their inhabitants in the course of a military exchange) and of ‘final retaliation’ (to destroy much or all that the enemy values, especially the lives of its citizens, in the event that we have nothing much left to lose), and it is not possible for such a policy to be put in place as a scheme of deterrence without some people intending, albeit conditionally, that these threats to kill innocents be carried out. So such a policy cannot be morally justified. The chapter is prefaced by reflections on Maritain's thesis that the temporal vocation of the Christian requires a comprehensive aim such as the concrete historical ideal of building a new or better Christendom. An endnote considers the arguments of Sir Michael Quinlan, architect of the contemporary British nuclear deterrent, the position of the US Bishops in 1983 and 1988, and the position of Israel.

Keywords:   nuclear deterrence, conditional intent, bluff, Maritain, Christian vocation, Michael Quinlan, Christendom, Israel

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .