Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Human Rights and Common Good$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John Finnis

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199580071

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580071.001.0001

Subscriber Login

Forgotten your password?

The Restoration of Retribution

Chapter:
(p.161) 11 The Restoration of Retribution
Source:
Human Rights and Common Good
Author(s):

John Finnis

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580071.003.0012

This chapter shows how Hart's account of restorative justice in relation to torts, in The Concept of Law, suggests an account of retributive justice in relation to crimes. Such an account is partially developed by Jeffrie Murphy, but needs the completion that is afforded when what the offender gains in the act of offending is correctly identified, along with the responsiveness of punishment precisely to that gain. Punishment has as its general justifying aim the restoration of the fair balance of advantages and disadvantages between citizens that was disrupted by the crime (when committed with full mensrea). The relations between this account and the different accounts of punishment's aim by Aquinas, Kant, and utilitarianism are traced.

Keywords:   restorative justice, retribution, justifying aim, Jeffrie Murphy, Aquinas, Kant, utilitarianism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.