Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Competition, Competitive Advantage, and ClustersThe Ideas of Michael Porter$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Robert Huggins and Hiro Izushi

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199578030

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578030.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 24 November 2017

The evolution and eclecticism of Porter's thinking

The evolution and eclecticism of Porter's thinking

Chapter:
(p.93) 6 The evolution and eclecticism of Porter's thinking
Source:
Competition, Competitive Advantage, and Clusters
Author(s):

Nicolai J. Foss (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578030.003.0006

The chapter highlights the substantial changes have taken place in Porter's thinking from his Ph.D. dissertation to his work on the role of location. While the doctrinal antecedents of the Porter industry analysis approach are clear and unambiguous, namely IO economics in the Bain/Mason tradition, Porter has brought essentially resource-based insights into the frameworks of his later contributions, Competitive Advantage and The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Foss argues that this is not just a matter of Porter successively directing his attention to different analytical objects, it is also a matter of his attempting to approach different phenomena without applying the outgrowths of fundamental theory. The chapter argues that the developments in Porter's thinking show that different theoretical alternatives are brought together in loose frameworks with no serious attempt to confront them and examine their logical relations, i.e., in terms of whether they are consistent, complementary, or mutually exclusive.

Keywords:   Michael Porter, industrial organization, competitive advantage

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .