Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch-UpAn International Comparative Study$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Hiroyuki Odagiri, Akira Goto, Atsushi Sunami, and Richard R. Nelson

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199574759

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574759.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 July 2018

Innovation and IPR in a Catch‐Up‐Falling‐Behind Process: The Argentine Case

Innovation and IPR in a Catch‐Up‐Falling‐Behind Process: The Argentine Case

Chapter:
(p.247) 8 Innovation and IPR in a Catch‐Up‐Falling‐Behind Process: The Argentine Case
Source:
Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch-Up
Author(s):

Andrés López

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574759.003.0008

This chapter first points out that, for Argentina, the twentieth century was the period of falling behind. Although catch‐up occurred during 1860–1929, the economy at the time was mainly based on agriculture. By contrast, industrialization and technological capability building took place while the overall economy was falling behind following the government's import substitution policy and macro instability. The chapter examines technology transfer, learning, and innovation in the country's catch‐up and falling‐behind processes, and the role of intellectual property regime. It is argued that the IPR regime had little impact except for on agriculture and pharmaceuticals. These two industries are analyzed in detail to suggest that the domestic pharmaceutical firms failed to accumulate technological capabilities even in the absence of product patents and that genetically modified soybeans diffused widely because the American inventor, Monsanto, failed to secure a patent for it in Argentina.

Keywords:   Argentina, catch‐up, falling‐behind, intellectual property, patent, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, genetically modified, technology transfer

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .