Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement$

Michelle T. Grando

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780199572649

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572649.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 23 October 2018

(p.387) Bibliography

(p.387) Bibliography

Source:
Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

A. Reports and Proceedings of International Organizations

Using the Right to Information as an Anti-Corruption Tool (Berlin: Transparency International, 2006).

American Law Institute & UNIDROIT, Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

Conclusions and Recommendations of the Special Commission on the Practical Operation of The Hague Apostille, Evidence and Service Conventions (28 October to 4 November 2003) available at http://hcch.e-vision.nl/upload/wop/lse_concl_e.pdf(accessed 15 January 2007).

ICC Commission on Arbitration, Techniques for Controlling Time and Costs in Arbitration(Paris: International Chamber of Commerce, 2007).

International Court of Justice, The International Court of Justice(5th edn, The Hague: ICJ, 2004).

Sutherland, Peter, et al, The Future of the WTO: Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millenium(Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2004).

B. Dictionaries

The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).

The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).

Collins: Spanish-English, English-Spanish Dictionary (4th edn, Glasgow: HarperCollins, 1996).

Black’s Law Dictionary (8th edn, St Paul: Thomson West, 2004).

C. Books and Articles

Abbott, Frederick M, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to the Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights’ in F Ortino& E -U Petersmann(eds), The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003 (The Hague: Kluwer International Law, 2004) 421.

Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement and General International Law’ in R Yerxa& B Wilson(eds), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: the First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 7.

Aghahosseini, M, ‘Evidence before the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal’ (1999) 1:4 International Law FORUM du Droit International 208.

Alvarez, José E, International Organizations as Law-makers(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).

Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, Local Remedies in International Law(2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

—— Evidence in International Litigation(Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).

Andersen, Scott, ‘Administration of Evidence in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ in R Yerxa& B Wilson(eds), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: the First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 177.

(p.388) Anderson, Terence, David Schum& William Twining, Analysis of Evidence(2nd edn, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Andrews, Neil, English Civil Procedure: Fundamentals of the New Civil Justice System(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

Applegate, John S, ‘The Prometheus Principle: Using the Precautionary Principle to Harmonize the Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms’ (2001) 9 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 207.

Ashford, Peter, ‘Documentary Discovery and International Commercial Arbitration’ (2006) 17 American Review of International Arbitration 89.

Barcelo, John J, III, ‘Burden of Proof, Prima Facie Case, and Presumption in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2009) 42:1 Cornell International Law Journal (forthcoming).

—— ‘Product Standards to Protect the Local Environment: the GATT and the Uruguay Round Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement’ (1994) 27 Cornell International Law Journal 755.

Bartels, Lorand, ‘The WTO Enabling Clause and Positive Conditionality in the European Community’s GSP Program’ (2003) 6:2 Journal of International Economic Law 507.

—— ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Practice on Article XXIV of the GATT’ in F Ortino& E -U Petersmann(eds), The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995-2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004) 263.

Becroft, Ross, ‘The Standard of Review Strikes Back: the US–Korea Drams Appeal’ (2006) 9:1 Journal of International Economic Law 207.

Behboodi, Rambod, ‘“Should” Means “Shall” A Critical Analysis of the Obligation to Submit Information under Article 13.1 of the DSU in the Canada – AircraftCase’ (2000) Journal of International Economic Law 563.

Bello, Judith Hippler, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less is More’ (1996) 90:3 The American Journal of International Law 416.

Berg, Albert Jan van den(ed), Planning Efficient Arbitration Proceedings: the Law Applicable in International Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996).

Bernard, Thierry, ‘The Administration of Evidence in Countries of Civil Law’ in PV Eijsvoogel(ed), Evidence in International Arbitration (London: Graham and Trotman and Martinus Nijhoff, 1994) 21.

Daniel, Bethlehem, ‘Submissions on Points of Fact and Law: Written and Oral Pleadings Before the International Court of Justice’ in F Weiss(ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000) 175.

Bilder, Richard B, ‘An Overview of International Dispute Settlement’ (1986) 1 Journal of International Dispute Resolution 1.

Bishop, R Doak, James Crawford& W Michael Reisman, Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary(The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005).

Black, Stephen F, ‘United States Transnational Discovery: the Rise and Fall of the Hague Evidence Convention’ (1991) 40 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 901.

Block, Michael K, & Jeffrey S Parker, ‘Decision Making in the Absence of Successful Fact Finding: Theory and Experimental Evidence on Adversarial Versus Inquisitorial Systems of Adjudication’ (2004) 24 International Review of Law and Economics 89.

Bohanes, Jan, & Nicolas Lockhart, ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’ in D Bethlehemet al (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 378.

(p.389) Boisseson, Matthieu de, ‘Comparative Introduction to the Systems of Producing Evidence in Common Law Countries and Countries of Roman Law Tradition’ in Taking of Evidence in the Arbitral Proceedings(Paris: ICC Publishing, 1990) 99.

Bolt, Jan W, & Joseph K Wheatley, ‘Private Rules for International Discovery in U.S. District Court: the U.S.–German Example’ (2006) 11 UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 1.

Brealey, Mark, ‘The Burden of Proof Before the European Court’ (1985) 10 European Law Review 250.

Broeck, Koen Van den, ‘Belgium’ in PV Eijsvoogel(ed), Evidence in International Arbitration Proceedings (London: Graham & Trotman and Martinus Nijhoff, 1994) 77.

Bronckers, Marco, & Natalie McNelis, ‘Fact and Law in Pleadings before the WTO Appellate Body’ in F Weiss(ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000) 321.

Broude, Tomer, ‘Genetically Modified Rules: the Awkward Rule-Exception-Right Distinction in EC – Biotech’ (2007) 6:2 World Trade Review 215.

Broun, Kenneth S(ed), McCormick on Evidence (6th edn, St Paul: Thomson/West, 2006).

Brower, Charles, ‘Discovery and Production of Evidence in the U.S.: Theory and Practice’ in Taking of Evidence in the Arbitral Proceedings(Paris: ICC Publishing, 1990) 7.

—— ‘Evidence before International Tribunals: the Need for Some Standard Rules’ (1994) 28 The International Lawyer 47.

Brown, Chester, A Common Law of International Adjudication(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law(6th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

Buergenthal, Thomas, ‘Judicial Fact-Finding: Inter-American Human Rights Court’ in RB Lillich(ed), Fact-Finding before International Tribunals (Ardsley-on-Hudson: Transnational Publishers, 1990) 261.

Busch, Marc L, & Eric Reinhardt, ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes’ (2000) 24 Fordham International Law Journal 158.

Buschbeck, Konrad, ‘Evidence: Procedures of Judicial Discovery and Burden of Proof’ in H Mosler(ed), Judicial Protection against the Executive (Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications, 1971) 153.

Cadiet, L, ‘The New French Code of Civil Procedure (1975)’ in CH van Rhee(ed), European Traditions in Civil Procedure (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2005) 49.

Cameron, James, & Kevin R Gray, ‘Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body’ (2001) 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 248.

Cameron, James, & Stephen J Orava, ‘GATT/WTO Panels between Recording and Finding Facts: Issues of Due Process, Evidence, Burden of Proof, and Standard of Review in GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement’ in F Weiss(ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000) 195.

(p.390) Cappelletti, Mauro, The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).

Carbonneau, Thomas E, ‘Darkness and Light in the Shadows of International Arbitral Adjudication’ in RB Lillich(ed), Fact-Finding before International Tribunals (Ardsley-on-Hudson: Transnational Publishers, 1992) 153.

Carlucci, Aida Kemelmajer de, ‘La Charge de la Preuve dans les Principes et Regles ALI/UNIDROIT relatifs a la procedure civile transnationale’ (2001) 2 Revue de Droit Uniforme 915.

Carnelutti, Francisco, Sistema de Derecho Procesal Civil(Buenos Aires: Uteha Argentina, 1944).

Charnovitz, Steve, et al, ‘The Appellate Body’s GSP Decision’ (2004) 3:2 World Trade Review 239.

Cheng, Bin, ‘Burden of Proof before the ICJ’ (1953) 2 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 595.

—— General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals(London: Stevens & Sons, 1953).

Christoforou, Theofanis, ‘WTO Panels in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty’ in F Weiss(ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000) 243.

Cintra, Antonio Carlos de Araújo, Ada Pellegrini Grinover & Cândido R Dinamarco, Teoria Geral do Processo(12th edn, São Paulo: Malheiros, 1996).

Clermont, Kevin M, & Emily Sherwin, ‘A Comparative View of Standards of Proof’ (2002) 50 American Journal of Comparative Law 243.

Cone, Sydney M III, ‘The Asbestos Case and Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: the Uneasy Relationship between Panels and the Appellate Body’ (2001) 23 Michigan Journal of International Law 103.

Collier, John, & Vaughan Lowe, The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).

Collins, David, ‘Institutionalized Fact-Finding at the WTO’ (2006) 27 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 367.

Cossy, Mireille, ‘Panel’s Consultations with Scientific Experts: the Right to Seek Information under Article 13 of the DSU’ in R Yerxa& B Wilson(eds), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: the First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 204.

Costello, Kevin, ‘Administrative Law – The Burden of Proof on Judicial Review’ (1993) 15 Dublin University Law Journal 134.

Cottier, Thomas, ‘Risk Management Experience in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in D Robertson& A Kellow(eds), Globalization and the Environment: Risk Assessment and the WTO (Chelthenham: Edward Elgar, 2001) 41.

—— ‘The WTO Permanent Panel Body: a Bridge Too Far?’ (2003) 6:1 Journal of International Economic Law 187.

Craig, W Lawrence, William W Park& Jan Paulsson, International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration(3rd edn, Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications, 2000).

Croley, Steven P, & John H Jackson, ‘WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments’ (1996) 90:2 The American Journal of International Law 193.

(p.391) Crook, John, ‘Fact-Finding in the Fog: Determining the Facts of Upheavals and Wars in Inter-State Disputes’ in R Alford& C Rogers(eds), The Future of Investment Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).

Cross, Karen Halverson, ‘King Cotton, Developing Countries and the “Peace Clause”: the WTO’s US Cotton SubsidiesDecision’ (2006) 9 Journal of International Economic Law 149.

Crump, David, et al, Cases and Materials on Civil Procedure(5th edn, Newark: LexisNexis, 2008).

Czako, Judith, Johann Human& Jorge Miranda, A Handbook on Anti-Dumping Investigations(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Damaska, Mirjan, ‘Presentation of Evidence and Factfinding Precision’ (1975) 123 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1083.

—— ‘The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and Continental Experiments’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law 839.

—— Evidence Law Adrift(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997).

Damme, Isabelle Van, Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).

Dávalos, José Vizcarra, Teoría General del Proceso(9th edn, Mexico City: Editorial Porrúa, 2007).

Davey, William J, ‘Expediting the Panel Process in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in ME Janow, V Donaldson& A Yanovich(eds), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement, and Developing Countries (New York: Juris Publishing, 2008) 409.

—— ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement System: the First Ten Years’ (2005) 8 Journal of International Economic Law 17.

—— ‘The Case for a WTO Permanent Panel Body’ (2003) 6:1 Journal of International Economic Law 177.

—— ‘Proposals for Improving the Working Procedures of WTO Dispute Settlement Panels’ in F Ortino& E -U Petersmann(eds), The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995-2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004) 19.

—— ‘The WTO: Looking Forwards’ (2006) 9:1 Journal of International Economic Law 3.

—— ‘Evaluating WTO Dispute Settlement: What Results Have Been Achieved through Consultations and Implementation of Panel Reports?’ in Y Taniguchi, A Yanovich& J Bohanes(eds), The WTO in the Twenty-first Century: Dispute Settlement, Negotiations, and Regionalism in Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007) 98.

Dawson, Grant, & Joakim Dungel, ‘Compulsion of Information from States and Due Process in Cases before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ (2007) 20:1 Leiden Journal of International Law 115.

Demougin, Dominique, & Claude Fluet, ‘Deterrence Versus Judicial Error: a Comparative View of Standards of Proof’ (2005) 161 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 193.

Denning, AT, ‘Presumptions and Burdens’ (1945) 61 The Law Quarterly Review 379.

Derains, Yves, & Eric A Schwartz, A Guide to the ICC Rules of Arbitration(2nd edn, The Hague: Kluwer International, 2005).

Dodd, Christian, The French Code of Civil Procedure in English(Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications, 2005).

Dworkin, Roger B, ‘Easy Cases, Bad Law, and Burdens of Proof’ (1972) 25 Vanderbilt Law Review 1151.

(p.392) Edward, David, ‘Fact-Finding: a British Perspective’ in DLC Miller& PR Beaumont(eds), The Option of Litigating in Europe (London: United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law, 1993) vol. 14, 43.

Eggleston, Sir Richard, Evidence, Proof and Probability(2nd edn, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1983).

Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, ‘Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court”: Some Personal Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’ (2002) 36:4 Journal of World Trade 605.

—— ‘Reflections on the Appellate Body of the WTO’ (2003) 6:3 Journal of International Economic Law 695.

—— ‘Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court”: Some Personal Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’ in F Ortino& E -U Petersmann(eds), The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004) 499.

—— & Nicolas Lockhart, ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’ (2004) 7:3 Journal of International Economic Law 491.

Ehring, Lothar, ‘Public Access to Dispute Settlement Hearings in the World Trade Organization’ (2008) 11:4 Journal of International Economic Law 1021.

Eijsvoogel, Peter V(ed), Evidence in International Arbitration Proceedings (London: Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff, 1994).

Elsing, Siegfried H, & John M Townsend, ‘Bridging the Common Law–Civil Law Divide in Arbitration’ (2002) 18:1 Arbitration International 59.

Fellas, John, ‘Obtaining Evidence Abroad for Use in International Litigation: Evidence Located in the United States’ (2001) 29:July/August International Business Lawyer 297.

—— ‘Using Section 1782 in International Arbitration’ (2007) 23:3 Arbitration International 379.

Field, Richard H, Benjamin Kaplan& Kevin M Clermont, Civil Procedure(8th edn, New York: Foundation Press, 2003).

Fisher, George, Evidence(New York: Foundation Press, 2002).

Fishman, Clifford S, Jones on Evidence: Civil and Criminal(7th edn, Rochester: Lawyers Cooperative Publishing, 1992).

Fitzmaurice, Sir Gerald, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice(Cambridge: Grotius, 1986).

Fleming James, Jr, ‘Burdens of Proof’ (1961) 47 Virginia Law Review 51.

Franck, Thomas M, Fairness in International Law and Institutions(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).

Friedenthal, Jack H, Mark Kay Kane& Arthur R Miller, Civil Procedure(4th edn, St Paul: Thomson West, 2005).

Fukunaga, Yuka, ‘Securing Compliance through the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Implementation of DSB Recommendations’ (2006) 9:2 Journal of International Economic Law 383.

Gaffney, John P, ‘Due Process in the World Trade Organization: the Need for Procedural Justice in the Dispute Settlement System’ (1999) 14 American University International Law Review 1173.

Gaillard, Emmanuel, & John Savage(eds), Fouchard Gaillard and Goldman on International Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999).

(p.393) Galligan, DJ, Due Process and Fair Procedures: a Study of Administrative Procedures(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).

Gans, Jeremy, & Andrew Palmer, Australian Principles of Evidence(London: Cavendish, 2004).

García, Fernando Flores, Teoria General de la Composición del Litigio(México DF: Editorial Porrúa, 2003).

Gaskins, Richard H, Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993).

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘The Legal Nature of WTO Obligations and the Consequences of their Violation’ (2006) 17:4 European Journal of International Law 723.

Genin-Meric, Régine, ‘Droit de la Preuve: l’Exemple Français’ in JML de Freitas(ed), The Law of Evidence in the European Union (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004) 137.

Giverdon, Claude, ‘The Problem of Proof in French Civil Law’ (1956) 31 Tulane Law Review 29.

Godard, Joelle, ‘Fact-Finding: a French Perspective’ in DLC Miller& PR Beaumont(eds), The Option of Litigating in Europe (London: United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law, 1993) vol 14, 57.

Gottlieb, Stephen E, ‘The Paradox of Balancing Significant Interests’ (1994) 45 Hastings Law Journal 825.

Gottwald, Peter, ‘Fact-Finding: a German Perspective’ in DLC Miller& PR Beaumont(eds), The Option of Litigating in Europe (London: United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law, 1993) vol 14, 67.

Grando, Michelle T, ‘Allocating the Burden of Proof in WTO Disputes: a Critical Analysis’ (2006) 9:3 Journal of International Economic Law 615.

Green, Andrew, & Tracey Epps, ‘The WTO, Science, and the Environment: Moving Towards Consistency’ (2007) 10:2 Journal of International Economic Law 285.

Griffin, Peter R, ‘Recent Trends in the Conduct of International Arbitration: Discovery Procedures and Witness Hearings’ (2000) 17:2 Journal of International Arbitration 19.

Gross, Samuel R, ‘The American Advantage: the Value of Inefficient Litigation’ (1987) 85:4 Michigan Law Review 734.

Grossman, Gene M, & Petros Mavroidis, ‘United States—Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act, Recourse to Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU: Would’ve or Should’ve? Impaired Benefits Due to Copyright Infringement’ in H Horn& PC Mavroidis(eds), The WTO Case Law of 2001: The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 281.

Gunter, Pierre-Yves, ‘Transnational Rules on the Taking of Evidence’ in E Gaillardet al (eds), Towards a Uniform International Arbitration Law? (Huntington: Juris Publishing, 2005) 129.

Guzman, Andrew T, ‘Food Fears: Health and Safety at the WTO’ (2004) 45 Virginia Journal of International Law 1.

Hadfield, Gillian, ‘The Levers of Legal Design: Institutional Determinants of the Quality of Law’ (May 2007) USC Legal Studies Research Paper No 07-6.

Hanotiau, Bernard, ‘Satisfying the Burden of Proof: the Point of View of a “Civil Law” Lawyer’ (1994) 10 Arbitration International 341.

Hay, Bruce L, ‘Allocating the Burden of Proof’ (1997) 72 Indiana Law Journal 651.

(p.394) —— & Kathryn E Spier, ‘Burdens of Proof in Civil Litigation: an Economic Perspective’ (1997) 26 Journal of Legal Studies 413.

Hazard, Geoffrey C, Jr,‘Discovery and the Role of the Judge in Civil Law Jurisdictions’ (1998) 73:4 Notre Dame Law Review 1017.

—— ‘Jury Trial and the Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure’ (2006) 25:2 Penn State International Law Review 499.

Hebly, Jan M, The Netherlands Civil Evidence Act 1988(Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1992).

Herlitz, Georg Nils, ‘The Meaning of the Term ‘Prima Facie’’ (1991) 55 Louisiana Law Review 391.

Herzog, Peter, Civil Procedure in France(The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1967).

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘Respecting Sovereign States and Running a Tight Courtroom’ (2001) 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 121.

Highet, Keith, ‘Evidence, the Court, and the Nicaragua Case’ (1987) 81 The American Journal of International Law 1.

—— ‘Evidence and Proof of Facts’ in LF Damrosch(ed), The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads(New York: Transnational Publishers, 1987) 355.

Hilf, Meinhard, ‘Power, Rules and Principles – which Orientation for WTO/GATT Law?’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law 111.

Hill, Marvin F, Jr,& Anthony V Sinicropi, Evidence in Arbitration(2nd edn, Washington: The Bureau of National Affairs, 1987).

Holtzmann, Howard M, ‘Fact-Finding by the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal’ in Lillich, RB(ed), Fact-Finding before International Tribunals (Ardsley-on-Hudson: Transnational Publishers, 1992) 101.

—— ‘Streamlining Arbitral Proceedings: Some Techniques of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal’ (1995) 11:1 Arbitration International 39.

Horn, Henrik, & Petros Mavroidis, ‘Still Hazy after All These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case Law on Tax Discrimination’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 39.

Horn, Henrik, & Joseph HH Weiler, ‘European Communities – Trade Description of Sardines: Textualism and its Discontents’ in H Horn& PC Mavroidis(eds), The WTO Case Law of 2002 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 248.

Howse, Robert, & Petros C Mavroidis, ‘Europe’s Evolving Regulatory Strategy for GMOs – the Issue of Consistency with WTO Law: of Kine and Brine’ (2000) 24 Fordham International Law Journal 317.

Howse, Robert, & Damien J Neven, ‘Canada – Export Credits and Loan Guarantees for Regional Aircraft (WT/DS222/R): a Comment’ in H Horn& P Mavroidis(eds), The WTO Case Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 88.

Huang, Kuo-Chang, Introducing Discovery into Civil Law(Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2003).

Hudec, Robert E, The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy(2nd edn, Salem: Butterworth, 1990).

Hughes, Valerie, ‘Accomplishments of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism’ in Y Taniguchi, A Yanovich& J Bohanes(eds), The WTO in the Twenty-first Century: Dispute Settlement, Negotiations, and Regionalism in Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007) 185.

(p.395) Iida, Keisuke, ‘Why Does the World Trade Organization Appear Neoliberal? The Puzzle of the High Incidence of Guilty Verdicts in WTO Adjudication’ (2003) 23:1 Journal of Public Policy 1.

Irwin, Douglas A, & Joseph Weiler, ‘Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Suply of Gambling and Betting Services (DS 285)’ in H Horn& PC Mavroidis(eds), The WTO Case Law of 2004–2005: Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008) 71.

Isunza, Gustavo Carvajal, & Fernando Gonzalez Rojas, ‘Evidentiary Issues in NAFTA Chapter 11 Arbitration: Searching for the Truth between States and Investors’ in T Weiler(ed), NAFTA Investment Law and Arbitration: Past Issues, Current Practice, Future Prospects (Ardsley: Transnational Publishers, 2004) 287.

Iwasawa, Yuji, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement as Judicial Supervision’ (2002) 5:2 Journal of International Economic Law 287.

Jackson, John H, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation’ (1997) 91:1 The American Journal of International Law 60.

—— ‘Dispute Settlement and the WTO Emerging Problems’ (1998) 1 Journal of International Economic Law 329.

—— The World Trade Organization: Constitution and Jurisprudence(London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1998).

—— ‘Sovereignty-Modern: a New Approach to an Outdated Concept’ (2003) 97:4 The American Journal of International Law 782.

—— Sovereignty, the WTO, and Changing Fundamentals of International Law(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

Janow, Merit E, & Robert W Staiger, ‘Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk’ (2004) 3:2 World Trade Review 277.

Johns, Roger J, & Anne Keaty, ‘The New and Improved Section 1782: Supercharging Federal District Court Discovery Assistance to Foreign and International Tribunals’ (2006) 29 American Journal of Trial Advocacy 649.

Jolowicz, JA, ‘Fact-Finding: a Comparative Perspective’ in DLC Miller& PR Beaumont(eds), The Option of Litigating in Europe (London: United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law, 1993) vol. 14, 133.

—— ‘Adversarial and Inquisitorial Models of Civil Procedure’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 281.

Jongbloed, AW, ‘The Netherlands (1838–2005)’ in CH van Rhee(ed), European Traditions in Civil Procedure (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2005) 69.

Joshua, Julian Mathic, ‘Proof in Contested EEC Competition Cases: A Comparison with the Rules of Evidence in Common Law’ (1987) 12 European Law Review 315.

Josling, Tim, et al, ‘Implications of WTO Litigation for the WTO Agricultural Negotiations’ (2006) 19 IPC Issue Brief.

Kang, Sungjin, ‘Comment on Annex V of the WTO SCM Agreement Procedures in the Context of Korea-Shipbuilding Dispute’ (2006) 33:2 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 183.

Kaplan, John, ‘Decision Theory and the Factfinding Process’ (1968) 20 Stanford Law Review 1065.

Kaplow, Louis, ‘The Value of Accuracy in Adjudication: an Economic Analysis’ (1994) 23:1 The Journal of Legal Studies 307.

(p.396) Kaye, David, ‘Naked Statistical Evidence’ (1980) 89:3 The Yale Law Journal 601.

—— ‘The Limits of the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard: Justifiably Naked Statistical Evidence and Multiple Causation’ (1982) 7:2 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 487.

Kazazi, Mojtaba, Burden of Proof and Related Issues: a Study on Evidence before International Tribunals(The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996).

Kennedy, Kevin C, ‘Resolving International Sanitary and Phytosanitary Disputes in the WTO: Lessons and Future Directions’ (2000) 55 Food and Drug Law Journal 81 at 83

Khalilian, Sayyed Khalil, The Law of International Arbitration(North Vancouver: Pacific Arbitration Network, 2003).

Klami, Hannu Tapani, Minna Grans& Johanna Sorvettula, Law and Truth: A Theory of Evidence(Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, 2000).

Koch, Harald, & Frank Diedrich, Civil Procedure in Germany(The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998).

Kokott, Juliane, The Burden of Proof in Comparative and International Human Rights Law: Civil and Common Law Approaches with Special Reference to the American and German Legal Systems(The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998).

Kometani, Kazumochi, ‘Trade and Environment: How Should WTO Panels Review Environmental Regulations under GATT Articles III and XX?’ (1996) 16 Northwestern School of Law Journal of International Law & Business 441.

Kreier, Jesse, ‘Contingent Trade Remedies and WTO Dispute Settlement: Some Particularities’ in R Yerxa& B Wilson(eds), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: The First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 46.

Kuijper, Pieter Jan, ‘The Appellate Body and the Facts’ in M Bronckers& R Quick(eds), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson (The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000) 309.

—— ‘The Pre-litigation Stage in the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure and in the EC Infringement Procedure’ in F Weiss(ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of other International Courts and Tribunals(London: Cameron May, 2000) 67.

Kurkela, Matti S, Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration(Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications, 2005).

Lachs, Manfred, ‘La Preuve et la Cour Internationale de Justice’ in C Perelman& P Foriers(eds), La Preuve en Droit (Brussels: Emile Bruylant, 1981) 109.

Lagarde, Xavier, Reflexion Critique sur le Droit de la Preuve(Paris: Librairie Generale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1994).

Langbein, John H, ‘The German Advantage in Civil Procedure’ (1985) 52:4 University of Chicago Law Review 823.

—— ‘Legal Institutions: Trashing the German Advantage’ (1988) 82 Northwestern University Law Review 763.

Lasok, KPE, The European Court of Justice: Practice and Procedure(2nd edn, London: Butterworths, 1994).

Laughlin, Charles V, ‘The Location of the Burden of Persuasion’ (1956) 18 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 3.

Lauterpacht, H, ‘The So-Called Anglo-American and Continental Schools of Thought in International Law’ (1931) 12 The British Yearbook of International Law (1931) 31.

(p.397) Layton, Duane W, ‘The Litigation of Anti-Dumping Disputes before the World Trade Organization’ (2000):4 Business Law International 294.

Lee, Thomas R, ‘Pleading and Proof: the Economics of Legal Burdens’ (1997) 1997 Brigham Young University Law Review 1.

Lenaerts, Koen, & Dirk Arts, Procedural Law of the European Union(London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1999).

Lewis, David, ‘Is It Time to Blow the Whistle on the Burden of Proof?’ (2002) 31:1 Industrial Law Journal 79.

Lichtenbaum, Peter, ‘Procedural Issues in WTO Dispute Resolution’ (1998) 19 Michigan Journal of International Law 1195.

Lockhart, Nicolas, ‘A WTO Case Study: the Cotton Dispute’ in F Ortino& S Ripinsky(eds), WTO Law and Process: The Proceedings of the 2005 and 2006 Annual WTO Conference (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2007) 122.

Losk, Daniel A, ‘Section 1782(a) After INTEL: Reconciling Policy Considerations and a Proposed Framework to Extend Judicial Assistance to International Arbitral Tribunals’ (2006) 27:2 Cardozo Law Review 1035.

Lowenfeld, Andreas F, International Economic Law(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).

—— et al, ‘International Aspects of Discovery’ (1989) 83 American Journal of International Law 495.

Luxton, Janet L, ‘Equality and Sex Discrimination in the European Union – Is Shifting the Burden of Proof the Answer?’ (1999) 17 Dickinson Journal of International Law 357.

MacLennan, Jacquelyn, ‘Evidence, Standard and Burden of Proof and the Use of Experts in Procedure Before the Luxembourg Courts’ in F Weiss(ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000) 265.

Magliveras, Konstantinos D, ‘Fact-Finding: a Greek Perspective’ in DLC Miller& PR Beaumont(eds), The Option of Litigating in Europe (London: United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law, 1993) vol 14, 87.

Malek, Hodge M, et al (eds), Phipson on Evidence(16th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2005).

Mani, VS, International Adjudication: Procedural Aspects(The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1980).

Marceau, Gabrielle, & Cornelis Reiman, ‘When and How is a Regional Trade Agreement Compatible with the WTO?’ (2001) 28:3 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 297.

Marceau, Gabrielle, & Matthew Stilwell, ‘Practical Suggestions for Amicus Curiae Briefs before WTO Adjudicating Bodies’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law 155.

Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J, ‘Presumptions and Burden of Proof’ (1997) 14 Journal of International Arbitration 67.

Maton, John, and Carolyn Maton, ‘Independence Under Fire: Extra-legal Pressures and Coalition Building in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2007) 2 Journal of International Economic Law at 328–9.

Matray, Lambert, ‘Les Traits Caracteristiques de L’Administration de la Preuve dans Certaines Procedures de Type Romaniste’ in Taking of Evidence in the Arbitral Proceedings(Paris: ICC Publishing, 1990) 113.

(p.398) Mavroidis, Petros C, ‘Amicus Curiae Briefs before the WTO: Much Ado about Nothing’ (2001) Jean Monnet Working Paper 2/01 http://www.worldtradelaw.net/articles/mavroidisamicus.pdf(accessed 22 April 2008).

—— ‘Development of WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures Through Case-Law (We Will Fix It)’ in F Ortino& E -U Petersmann(eds), The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004) 153.

—— & Werner Zdouc, ‘Legal Means to Protect Private Parties' Interests in the WTO. The Case of the EC New Trade Barriers Regulation’ (1998) 1:3 Journal of International Economic Law 407.

Mawdsley, Andrés Aguilar, ‘Evidence before the International Court of Justice’ in RSJ Macdonald(ed), Essays in Honor of Wang Tieya (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994) 533.

McCabe, Monica Petraglia, ‘Arbitral Discovery and the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal Experience’ (1986) 20 International Lawyer 499.

McGovern, Edmond, International Trade Regulation(3rd edn, Exeter: Globefield Press, 1995).

McNaughton, John T, ‘Burden of Production of Evidence: A Function of a Burden of Persuasion’ (1955) 68 Harvard Law Review 1382.

McRae, Donald, ‘The WTO in International Law: Tradition Continued or New Frontier?’ (2000) 3:1 Journal of International Economic Law 27.

—— ‘What is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?’ (2004) 7:1 Journal of International Economic Law 3.

Mecarelli, Gabriele, ‘Quelques Réflexions en Matière de Discovery’ (2001) 6 Uniform Law Review 901.

Megens, Peter, Paul Starr& Peter Chow, ‘Compulsion of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration: an Asia-Pacific Perspective’ (2006) 2:1 Asian International Arbitration Journal 32.

Mehren, Robert B von, ‘Burden of Proof in International Arbitration’ in AJ van den Berg, (ed), Planning Efficient Arbitration Proceedings: The Law Applicable in International Arbitration(The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996) 123.

Mendel, Toby, Freedom of Information: a Comparative Legal Survey(New Delhi: UNESCO, 2003).

Merrills, John, ‘The Means of Dispute Settlement’ in MD Evans(ed), International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) 533.

Merrills, JG, International Dispute Settlement(4th edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Mistelis, Loukas A, ‘Confidentiality and Third Party Participation UPS v. Canada and Methanex Corp. v. United States’ in T Weiler(ed), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilaterial Treaties and Customary International Law (London: Cameron May, 2005) 169.

Mitchell, Andrew D, ‘A Legal Principle of Special and Differential Treatment for WTO Disputes’ (2006) 5:3 World Trade Review 445.

—— ‘Due Process in WTO Disputes’ in R Yerxa& B Wilson(eds), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: the First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 144.

—— ‘The Legal Basis for Using Principles in WTO Disputes’ (2007) 10:4 Journal of International Economic Law 795.

(p.399) Mochizuki, Toshiro M, ‘Baby Step or Giant Leap?: Parties’ Expanded Access to Documentary Evidence under the New Japanese Code of Civil Procedure’ (1999) 40:1 Harvard International Law Journal 285.

Monnier, Pierre, ‘Working Procedures before Panels, the Appellate Body and other Adjudicating Bodies of the WTO’ in The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals(Kluwer Law International, 2002) 481.

Mosoti, Victor, ‘Africa in the First Decade of WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2006) 9:2 Journal of International Economic Law 427.

Mouri, Allahyar, The International Law of Expropriation as Reflected in the Work of the Iran–U.S. Claims Tribunal(Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994)

Murphy, Peter(ed), Evidence, Proof, and Facts: a Book of Resources (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).

Nichols, Philip M, ‘GATT Doctrine’ (1996) 36 Virginia Journal of International Law 379.

Nottage, Hunter, & Jan Bohanes, ‘Arbitration as an Alternative to Litigation in the WTO: Observations in the Light of the 2005 Banana Tariff Arbitrations’ in Y Taniguchi, A Yanovich& J Bohanes(eds), The WTO in the Twenty-first Century: Dispute Settlement, Negotiations, and Regionalism in Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007) 212.

Oberhammer, P, & T Domej, ‘Germany, Switzerland, Austria (CA. 1800–2005)’ in CH van Rhee(ed), European Traditions in Civil Procedure (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2005) 103.

Oberhammer, P, & T Domej, ‘Germany, Switzerland, and Austria’ in CH van Rhee(ed), European Traditions in Civil Procedure (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2005) 295.

Oesch, Matthias, ‘Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution’ (2003) 6:3 Journal of International Economic Law 635.

Oesch, Matthias Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

Okowa, Phoebe, ‘Issues of Admissibility and the Law on International Responsibility’ in MD Evans(ed), International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) 479.

Pacífico, Luiz Eduardo Boaventura, O Ônus da Prova no Direito Processual Civil(São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2001).

Palmeter, David, & Petros Mavroidis, Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: Practice and Procedure(2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

Panizzon, Marion, Good Faith in the Jurisprudence of the WTO(Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement: Who Bears the Burden?’ (1998) 1 Journal of International Economic Law 227.

——‘The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures as Applied in the First Three SPS Disputes. EC – Hormones, Australia – Salmonand Japan – Varietals’ (1999) 2:4 Journal of International Economic Law 641.

—— ‘The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 325.

——Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

(p.400) Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Practice 1995–2005: Lessons from the Past and Future Challenges’ in Y Taniguchi, A Yanovich& J Bohanes(eds), The WTO in the Twenty-first Century: Dispute Settlement, Negotiations, and Regionalism in Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007) 38.

Pfitzer, James Headen, & Sheila Sabune, ‘Burden-Shifting in WTO Dispute Settlement: The Prima Facie Doctrine’ (2008) March:2 Bridges 18.

Pietrowski, Robert, ‘Evidence in International Arbitration’ (2006) 22:3 Arbitration International 373.

Polkinghorne, MA, ‘The Withholding of Documentary Evidence in International Arbitration: Remedies for Dealing with Uncooperative Parties’ (2005) 2:5 Transnational Dispute Management.

Posner, Richard A, ‘An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence’ (1999) 51 Stanford Law Review 1477.

—— Economic Analysis of Law(New York: Aspen Publishers, 2003).

Powell, Stephen J, & Andrew Schmitz, ‘The Cotton and Sugar Subsidies Decisions: WTO’s Dispute Settlement System Rebalances the Agreement on Agriculture’ (2005) 10 Drake Journal of Agricultural Law 287.

Prost, Olivier, ‘Confidentiality Issues under the DSU: Fact-finding Process Versus Confidentiality’ in R Yerxa& B Wilson(eds), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: the First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 190.

Punt, BC, ‘Fact-Finding: a Dutch Perspective’ in DLC Miller& PR Beaumont(eds), The Option of Litigating in Europe (London: United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law, 1993) vol 14, 109.

Quick, Reinhard, & Andreas Bluthner, ‘Has the Appellate Body Erred? An Appraisal and Criticism of the Ruling in the WTO Hormones Case’ (1999) 2:4 Journal of International Economic Law 603.

Raeschke-Kessler, Hilmar, ‘The Production of Documents in International Arbitration: a Commentary on Article 3 of the New IBA Rules of Evidence’ (2002) 18:4 Arbitration International 411.

Ragosta, John, ‘Unmasking the WTO – Access to the DSB System: Can the WTO DSB Live Up to the Moniker “World Trade Court”?’ (2000) 31:3 Law and Policy in International Business 739.

Raustiala, Kal, ‘Rethinking the Sovereignty Debate in International Economic Law’ (2003) 6:4 Journal of International Economic Law 841.

Redfern, Alan, ‘The Practical Distinction between the Burden of Proof and the Taking of Evidence – an English Perspective’ (1994) 10 Arbitration International 317.

—— et al, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration(4th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2004).

Reed, Lucy, Jan Paulsson & Nigel Blackaby, A Guide to ICSID Arbitration(The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004).

Reiner, Andreas, ‘Burden and General Standards of Proof’ (1994) 10 Arbitration International 328.

Reufels, Martin, & Karl Kelly, ‘Transatlantic Discovery: How Useful is the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil and Commercial Matters?’ (2001) 29:July/August International Business Lawyer 291.

Reymond, Claude, ‘The Practical Distinction between the Burden of Proof and Taking of Evidence – A Further Perspective’ (1994) 10 Arbitration International 323.

(p.401) Rhee, CH van, ‘Introduction’ in CH van Rhee(ed), European Traditions in Civil Procedure (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2005) 3.

Riddell, Anna, & Brendan Plant, Evidence before the International Court of Justice(London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2009).

Roessler, Frieder, ‘The Concept of Nullification and Impairment in the Legal System of the World Trade Organization’ in E -U Petersmann(ed), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997) 123.

Rogers, Andrew, ‘Improving Procedures for Discovery and Documentary Evidence’ in AJ van den Berg(ed), Planning Efficient Arbitration Proceedings: the Law Applicable in International Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996) 131.

Rosenne, Shabtai, The Law and Practice of the International Court,1920–1996(3rd edn, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1997).

—— The Law and Practice of the International Court 1920–2005(Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006).

Rubino-Sammartano, Mauro, ‘Rules of Evidence in International Arbitration: a Need for Discipline and Harmonization’ (1986) 3:2 Journal of International Arbitration 87.

Sanchirico, Chris William, ‘The Burden of Proof in Civil Litigation: A Simple Model of Mechanism Design’ (1997) 17 International Review of Law and Economics 431.

Sandifer, Durward V, Evidence before International Tribunals(revised edn, Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1975).

Sapir, Andre, & Joel P Trachtman, ‘Subsidization, Price Suppression, and Expertise: Causation and Precision in Upland Cotton’ (2008) 7:1 World Trade Review 183.

Saunders, Kevin W, ‘The Mythic Difficulty in Proving a Negative’ (1985) 15 Seton Hall Law Review 276.

Schafer, Erik, Herman Verbist& Christophe Imhoos, ICC Arbitration in Practice(The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005).

Scirica, Anthony J, ‘Judge’s Response to Professors Hazard and Taruffo’ (2006) 25:2 Penn State International Law Review 519.

Scott, Joanne, The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: a Commentary(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).

Segger, Marie-Claire Cordonier, & Markus W Gehring, ‘The WTO and Precaution: Sustainable Development Implications of the WTO Asbestos Dispute’ (2003) 15:3 Journal of Environmental Law 289.

Selby, Jamison M, ‘Fact-Finding before the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal: a View from the Trenches’ in RB Lillich(ed), Fact-Finding before International Tribunals (Ardsley-on-Hudson: Transnational Publishers, 1992) 135.

Serio, Mario, ‘Fact-Finding: an Italian Perspective’ in DLC Miller& PR Beaumont(eds), The Option of Litigating in Europe (London: United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law, 1993) vol. 14, 123.

Shaffer, Gregory, ‘The Challenges of WTO Law: Strategies for Developing Country Adaptation’ (2006) 5:2 World Trade Review 177.

Sharpe, Jeremy K, ‘Drawing Adverse Inferences from the Non-production of Evidence’ (2006) 22:4 Arbitration International 549.

Shavell, Steven, ‘Optimal Sanctions and the Incentive to Provide Evidence to Legal Tribunals’ (1989) 9 International Review of Law and Economics 3.

(p.402) —— Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004).

Shaw, Malcolm N, International Law(5th edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Sheppard, Audley, ‘The Jurisdictional Threshold of a Prima Facie Case’ in P Muchlinski, F Ortino& C Schreuer(eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) 932.

Shoyer, Andrew W, ‘Panel Selection in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ (2003) 6:1 Journal of International Economic Law 203.

Smit, Hans, ‘Roles of the Arbitral Tribunal in Civil Law and Common Law Systems with Respect to Presentation of Evidence’ in AJ van den Berg(ed), Planning Efficient Arbitration Proceedings: The Law Applicable in International Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996) 161.

Sopinka, John, & Sidney N Lederman, The Law of Evidence in Civil Cases(Toronto: Butterworths, 1974).

——, Sidney N Lederman& Alan W Bryant, The Law of Evidence in Canada(Toronto: Butterworths, 1992).

——, Sidney N Lederman& Alan W Bryant, The Law of Evidence in Canada(2nd edn, Toronto: Butterworths, 1999).

Solum, Lawrence B, ‘Procedural Justice’ (2004) 78 Southern California Law Review 181.

Soriano, Miguel Virgos& Francisco J Garcimartin Alferez, Derecho Procesal Civil Internacional(Madrid: Civitas, 2000).

Spamann, Holger, ‘Standard of Review for World Trade Organization Panels in Trade Remedy Cases: a Critical Analysis’ (2004) 38:3 Journal of World Trade 509.

Stein, Alex, Foundations of Evidence Law(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

Stewart, Charles E, German Commercial Code & Code of Civil Procedure(Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications, 2001).

Stewart, Terence P(ed), The GATT Uruguay Round: a Negotiating History (1986–1992) (Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1993) vol I.

—— & Amy S Dwyer, Handbook on WTO Trade Remedy Disputes: The First Six Years (1995–2000)(Ardsley: Transnational Publishers, 2001).

Stone, Julius, ‘Burden of Proof and the Judicial Process: A Commentary on JosephConstantine Steamship, LTD. v. Imperial Smelting Corporation, LTD.’ (1944) 60 The Law Quarterly Review 262.

Strong, John W(ed), McCormick on Evidence (5th edn, St Paul: West Group, 1999) vol 2.

Sturner, Rolf, ‘Transnational Civil Procedure: Discovery and Sanctions against Non-Compliance’ (2001) 6 Uniform Law Review 871.

Subrin, Stephen N, et al, Civil Procedure: Doctrine, Practice, and Context(2nd edn, New York: Aspen, 2004).

Sullivan, Ruth, Statutory Interpretation(Concord: Irwin Law, 1997).

—— Sullivan and Driedger on the Construction of Statutes(4th edn, Vancouver: Butterworths, 2002).

Summers, Robert S, ‘Formal Legal Truth and Substantive Truth in Judicial Fact-Finding: Their Justified Divergence in Some Particular Cases’ (1999) 18 Law and Philosophy 497.

(p.403) Sutton, David St J, ‘Discovery and Production of Evidence in Arbitral Proceedings: the U.S. and England Distinguished’ in Taking of Evidence in the Arbitral Proceedings(Paris: ICC Publishing, 1990) 57.

Sykes, Alan O, ‘Domestic Regulation, Sovereignty, and Scientific Evidence Requirements: a Pessimistic View’ (2002) 3 Chicago Journal of International Law 353.

Tan, Pei-San, United States – Measures Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses(1998), online: http://207.57.19.226/journal/Vol9/No1/sr1c.html (Date accessed: 11 May 2009).

Taniguchi, Yasuhei, ‘Understanding the Concept of Prima Facie Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in ME Janow, V Donaldson& A Yanovich(eds), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement, and Developing Countries (Huntington: Juris Publishing, 2008) 553.

—— Pauline C Reich& Hiroto Miyake(eds), Civil Procedure in Japan (2nd edn, Yonkers: Juris Publishing, 2002).

Tapper, Colin, Cross & Tapper on Evidence(8th edn, London: Butterworths, 1995).

—— Cross and Tapper on Evidence(9th edn, London: Butterworths, 1999).

Taruffo, Michele, ‘Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure: an Evidentiary Epistemology’ (2006) 25:2 Penn State International Law Review 509.

Teitelbaum, Ruth, ‘Recent Fact-Finding Developments at the International Court of Justice’ (2007) 6 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 119.

Thayer, James B, ‘The Burden of Proof’ (1890) 4:2 Harvard Law Review 45.

Thirlway, Hugh, ‘Dilemma or Chimera? Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence in International Adjudication’ (1984) 78:3 American Journal of International Law 622.

Thirlway, HWA, ‘Evidence before International Courts and Tribunals’ in R Bernhardt(ed), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1995) vol 2, 302.

Thirlway, HWA, ‘Procedure of International Courts and Tribunals’ in R Bernhardt(ed), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997) vol 3, 1128.

Thomas, Christopher, ‘Litigation Process under the GATT Dispute Settlement System: Lessons for the World Trade Organization?’ (1996) 30:2 Journal of World Trade 53.

Thomas, EW, The Judicial Process: Realism, Pragmatism, Practical Reasoning and Principles(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Thomas, JC, ‘The Need for Due Process in WTO Proceedings’ (1997) 31:1 Journal of World Trade 45.

Trachtman, Joel P, ‘Trade and … Problems, Cost-Benefit Analysis and Subsidiarity’ (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law 32.

—— ‘The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution’ (1999) 40 Harvard International Law Journal 333.

Trebilcock, Michael J, & Robert Howse, The Regulation of International Trade(3rd edn, New York: Routledge, 2005).

Twining, William, Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays(2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

Ughi, Giovanni, et al, ‘Commentary on the New IBA Rules of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2000) 2 Business Law International 16.

Umbricht, Georg C, ‘An “Amicus Curiae Brief” on Amicus Curiae Briefs at the WTO’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law 773.

(p.404) Unterhalter, David, ‘The Burden of Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in ME Janow, V Donaldson& A Yanovich(eds), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement, and Developing Countries (Huntington: Juris Publishing, 2008) 543.

Valencia-Ospina, Eduardo, ‘Evidence before the International Court of Justice’ (1999) 1:4 International Law FORUM du Droit International 202.

Van den Bossche, Peter, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials(2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).

Vandenbussche, Hylke, ‘Comment: Upland Cotton Case’ (2008) 7:1 World Trade Review 211.

Verheyden-Jeanmart, Nicole, Droit de la Preuve(Brussels: Maison Larcier, 1991).

Verkerk, R, ‘The Netherlands: Powers of the Judge’ in CH van Rhee(ed), European Traditions in Civil Procedure (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2005) 281.

—— ‘England and Wales: Powers of the Judge’ in CH van Rhee(ed), European Traditions in Civil Procedure(Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2005) 307.

Vermulst, Edwin, The WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement: a Commentary(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

—— Petros C Mavroidis& Paul Waer, ‘The Functioning of the Appellate Body After Four Years: Towards Rule Integrity’ (1999) 33:2 Journal of World Trade 1.

Voon, Tania, & Alan Yanovich, ‘The Facts Aside: The Limitations of WTO Appeals to Issues of Law’ (2006) 40:2 Journal of World Trade 239.

Wade, Sir William, & Christopher Forsyth, Administrative Law, 9th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).

Waincymer, Jeff, WTO Litigation: Procedural Aspects of Formal Dispute Settlement(London: Cameron May, 2002).

Walker, Vern R, ‘Preponderance, Probability and Warranted Factfinding’ (1996) 62 Brooklyn Law Review 1075.

—— ‘Keeping the WTO from Becoming the “World Trans-science Organization”: Scientific Uncertainty, Science Policy, and Factfinding in the Growth Hormones Dispute’ (1998) 31 Cornell International Law Journal 251.

Wallace, Cynthia Day, ‘“Extraterritorial” Discovery: Ongoing Challenges for Antitrust Litigation in an Environment of Global Investment’ (2002) 5:2 Journal of International Economic Law 353.

Watts, Sir Arthur, ‘Burden of Proof, and Evidence Before the ICJ’ in F Weiss(ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000) 289.

Webster, Thomas H, ‘Obtaining Evidence from Third Parties in International Arbitration’ (2001) 17:2 Arbitration International 143.

—— ‘Obtaining Documents from Adverse Parties in International Arbitration’ (2001) 17:1 Arbitration International 41.

Weiler, JHH, ‘The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2001) 35:2 Journal of World Trade 191.

Weiss, Friedl, ‘Inherent Powers of National and International Courts’ in F Ortino& E -U Petersmann(eds), The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995-2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004) 177.

Wellens, Karel, Economic Conflicts and Disputes before the World Court (1922-1995): a Functional Analysis(The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996).

(p.405) Wetter, J Gillis, ‘The Rann of Kutch Arbitration’ (1971) 65:2 American Journal of International Law 346.

White, Eric L, ‘Written and Oral Submissions in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in F Weiss(ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of other International Courts and Tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000) 121.

Wigmore, John Henry, Evidence in Trials at Common Law(Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1981).

Wijffels, A, ‘France: Powers of the Judge’ in CH van Rhee(ed), European Traditions in Civil Procedure (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2005) 269.

Williams, Granville, ‘The Logic of “Exceptions”’ (1988) 47:2 Cambridge Law Journal 261.

Witenberg, JC, ‘La Theorie des Preuves Devant les Juridictions Internationales’ (1936) 56 Recueil des Cours 5.

—— ‘Onus Probandi Devant les Juridictions Arbitrales’ (1951) 55 Revue Generale de Droit International Public 321.

Yanovich, Alan, & Tania Voon, ‘Completing the Analysis in WTO Appeals: the Practice and its Limitations’ (2006) 9:4 Journal of International Economic Law 933.

Yanovich, Alan, & Werner Zdouc, ‘Procedural and Evidentiary Issues’ in D Bethlehemet al (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 344.

Yerxa, Rufus, ‘The Power of the WTO Dispute Settlement System’ in R Yerxa& B Wilson(eds), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: The First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 3.

Zeitler, Helge Elisabeth, ‘“Good Faith” in the WTO Jurisprudence – Necessary Balancing Element or an Open Door to Judicial Activism?’ (2005) 8:3 Journal of International Economic Law 721.

Zekoll, Joachim, ‘Comparative Civil Procedure’ in M Reimann& R Zimmermann(eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) 1327.

Zoller, Elisabeth(ed), La Bonne Foi en Droit International Public (Paris: Editions A Pedone, 1977).

D. WTO Official Documents

Appellate Body Annual Report for 2008, WTO Doc. WT/AB/11, 9 February 2009.

Communication from the Appellate Body in European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products,WTO Doc. WT/DS135/9, 8 November 2000.

Communication from Chile and the United States, WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/89, 31 May 2007.

Communication from the United States, WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/82, 24 October 2005.

Communication from Chile and the United States, WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/52, 14 March 2003.

Contribution of Canada to the Improvement of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/41, 24 January 2003.

Contribution of the European Communities and its Member States to the Improvement of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/1, 13 March 2002.

Contribution of the European Communities and its Member States to the Improvement and Clarification of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/38,23 January 2003.

(p.406) Contribution by the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu to the Doha Mandated Review of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/36, 22 January 2003.

Contribution from Thailand to Clarify and Improve the Dispute Settlement Understanding: Panel System, WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/31, 22 January 2003.

Doha Work Programme, Decision Adopted by the General Council on 1 August 2004, Annex A – Framework for Establishing Modalities in Agriculture, WTO Doc. WT/L/579, 2 August 2004.

Minutes of the Meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body held on 12 June 1997, WTO Doc. WT/DSB/M/34, 8 July 1997.

Minutes of the Meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body held on 6 November 1998, WTO Doc. WT/DSB/M/50, 14 December 1998.

Minutes of the Meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body held on 31 March 2003, WTO Doc. WT/DSB/M/146, 19 May 2003.

Minutes of the Meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body held on 23 September 2005, WTO Doc. WT/DSB/M/197, 10 October 2005.

Minutes of the Meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body held on 17 February 2006, WTO Doc. WT/DSB/M/205, 31 March 2006.

Minutes of the Meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body held on 14 March 2006, WTO Doc. WT/DSB/M/206, 4 April 2006.

Minutes of the Special Meeting Held on 20 December 1999, WTO Doc. G/SCM/M/22, 17 December 2000 101.

Proposal by Costa Rica on Third Party Rights, WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/12/Rev.l, 6 March 2003.

Proposal by Japan on Amendment of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, WTO Doc. TN/DS/W/32, 22 January 2003.

Singapore Ministerial Declaration, WTO Doc. WT/MIN(96)/DEC, 18 December 1996, available at http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min96_e/wtodec_e.htm(visited on 1 July 2007).

Understanding Regarding Notification, Consultation, Dispute Settlement and Surveillance, L/4907, adopted on 28 November 1979, GATT, BISD 26 Supp. 210 (1980).

E. Others

Cairns Group Proposal, Improving Monitoring and Surveillance, Communication to the Committee on Agriculture Special Session, 12 June 2007, JOB(07)/88, available at http://www.cairnsgroup.org/proposals/070614_doc_07_88.pdfaccessed 20 May 2009.

Lamy, Pascal,‘Evolving Trade Increases Need for Active Transparency’, Speech given at the Georgetown University Law Center (22 October 2007), available at http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl78_e.htmaccessed 20 May 2009.

Technical Information on Balance of Payments, available at http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/bop_e/bop_info_e.htmaccessed 20 May 2009.

The Project on International Courts and Tribunals: The International Judiciary in Context, Synoptic Chart, November 2004, available at http://www.pict-pcti.org/publications/synoptic_chart.htmlaccessed 21 June 2007.