Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Carbon-Energy TaxationLessons from Europe$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mikael Skou Andersen and Paul Ekins

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780199570683

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570683.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 December 2018

Carbon‐Energy Taxation, Revenue Recycling, and Competitiveness

Carbon‐Energy Taxation, Revenue Recycling, and Competitiveness

Chapter:
(p.3) 1 Carbon‐Energy Taxation, Revenue Recycling, and Competitiveness
Source:
Carbon-Energy Taxation
Author(s):

Mikael Skou Andersen

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570683.003.0001

This chapter reviews the theoretical debate on the properties of environmental tax reforms and implications for competitiveness. Starting from the Porter hypothesis, a claim was made for improvements in competitiveness from shifting taxation from good to bad – from labour to pollution. The chapter argues with reference to Leibenstein (1966) that the benefits of tax‐shifting need to be appreciated not only from the perspective of allocative efficiency, but also from associated improvements in incentive efficiency. The review is followed by a closer inspection of the concept of competitiveness, whereby both its broader connotations as well as some official definitions are considered. The purpose is to present a clarification of the conceptual and methodological basis for the assessment of competitiveness impacts for energy‐intensive industries and European economies undertaken in this book. In the final section, the chapter presents the research methodology underlying the book as a whole and provides a brief introduction to individual chapters. The need for a complementary research design combining a top‐down macroeconomic with bottom‐up sectoral approaches is argued.

Keywords:   competitiveness, double dividend, revenue recycling, X‐efficiency, carbon‐energy taxation, environmental tax reform

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .