Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Responsibility and Distributive Justice$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Carl Knight and Zofia Stemplowska

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199565801

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565801.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 21 March 2019

Luck Egalitarianism—A Primer 1

Luck Egalitarianism—A Primer 1

Chapter:
(p.24) 1 Luck Egalitarianism—A Primer1
Source:
Responsibility and Distributive Justice
Author(s):

Richard J. Arneson (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565801.003.0002

Luck egalitarianism combines two broad ideas, egalitarianism and ‘luckism’. This chapter canvasses varieties of these two ideas with a view to identifying the most promising among them and assessing their various strengths and weaknesses. Consequentialist and deontological versions of the doctrine are identified and evaluated. Some versions of the doctrine purport to be components of a comprehensive morality, not the whole of it, whereas at least one proposal purports to be a complete and fundamental morality. All versions of the doctrine aim to integrate a sensible view of personal responsibility into the theory of social justice. In the literature, luck egalitarianism is associated with approaches to social justice that hold that people are owed opportunities or capabilities not any particular quality of life outcomes. The chapter defends a resolutely outcome-focused version of the doctrine. It also defends asocial theories of distributive justice from social interactionist objections.

Keywords:   luck egalitarianism, responsibility, desert, choice, social justice, distributive justice, consequentialism, deontology, asocial

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .