The Interpretation of Silence in the WTO Covered Agreements
This chapter raises the question of how and when to interpret silence in the WTO covered agreements. The notion of ‘silence’ in treaty language is used as an alternative mode of thinking about so-called gaps in treaties. The chapter attempts to categorize certain types of silence in treaty language, and analyze how the Appellate Body responds to such silences. The first section briefly sketches the debate in general international law and WTO law to illustrate the unsatisfactory standard discourse. As an alternative, the notion of ‘silence’ is suggested as a more useful point of reference. The second section distinguishes between different types of silences, such as procedural and substantive silences. One of the underlying questions is whether the Appellate Body has perceived Article 3.2 DSU as a constraint in interpreting silence. It appears that this has not been the case, at least with respect to procedural silences.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.