Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Isabelle Van Damme

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780199562237

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562237.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 25 June 2018

The Interpretation of Silence in the WTO Covered Agreements

The Interpretation of Silence in the WTO Covered Agreements

Chapter:
(p.110) 4 The Interpretation of Silence in the WTO Covered Agreements
Source:
Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body
Author(s):

Isabelle Van Damme

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562237.003.0004

This chapter raises the question of how and when to interpret silence in the WTO covered agreements. The notion of ‘silence’ in treaty language is used as an alternative mode of thinking about so-called gaps in treaties. The chapter attempts to categorize certain types of silence in treaty language, and analyze how the Appellate Body responds to such silences. The first section briefly sketches the debate in general international law and WTO law to illustrate the unsatisfactory standard discourse. As an alternative, the notion of ‘silence’ is suggested as a more useful point of reference. The second section distinguishes between different types of silences, such as procedural and substantive silences. One of the underlying questions is whether the Appellate Body has perceived Article 3.2 DSU as a constraint in interpreting silence. It appears that this has not been the case, at least with respect to procedural silences.

Keywords:   gap-filling, judicial-law making, treaty interpretation, Lauterpacht, silence, procedural silences, substantive silences, Appellate Body

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .