Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Sound Patterns of Syntax$

Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Lisa Rochman

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199556861

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556861.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 20 June 2018

(p.352) References

(p.352) References

Source:
The Sound Patterns of Syntax
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Abu‐Fadl, F. (1961). Volkstuemliche Texte in arabischen Bauerndialekten der aegyptischen Provinz Sharqiyya. Muenster: University of Muenster.

Åfarli, T. A. (1995). ‘A note on the syntax of adverbial phrases’. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 13: 23–40.

—— (1997). ‘Dimensions of phrase structure: The representation of sentence adverbials’, Motskrift 2: Institutt for nordistikk og litteraturvitenskap, NTNU, 91–113.

—— (2008). Frames and Predication. Ms. NTNU, Trondheim.

Alexiadou, Artemis (1997). Adverb Placement. A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

—— (2001). ‘Adjective syntax and noun raising: word order asymmetries in the DP as the result of adjective distribution’. Studia Linguistica 55: 217–48.

Allan, R., Holmes, Philip, and Lundskær‐Nielsen, T. (1995). Danish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.

Anderson, Stephen R. (2005). Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anttila, Arto (2002). ‘Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 1–42.

Aronoff, Mark and Sridhar, S. (1983). ‘Morphological levels in English and Kannada, or Atarizing Reagan’, in J. Richardson, M. Marks, and A. Chukerman (eds), Chicago Linguistics Society 19, Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, 3–16. Reprinted (1987) in Edmund Gussmann (ed.), Rules and the Lexicon, Lublin: Katolicki Universytet Lubelski, 9–22.

Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., and Newport, E. L. (1998). ‘Computation of conditional probability statistics by human infants’. Psychological Science 9: 321–4.

Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., and Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD‐ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Bader, M. and Frazier, L. (2005). ‘Interpreting leftward‐moved constituents’. Special issue of Linguistics 43 (1): 49–87.

Baker, Mark (1985). ‘The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation’. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 373–415.

—— (2001). The Atoms of Language: The Mind's Hidden Rules of Grammar. New York: Basic Books.

Baltaxe, C. (1984). ‘The use of contrastive stress in normal, aphasic, and autistic children’. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27: 97–105.

Barbiers, S. (1995). ‘The syntax of interpretation’. Doctoral dissertation. Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.

(p.353) Baron‐Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

—— Leslie, A., and Frith, U. (1985). ‘Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?’. Cognition 21: 37–46.

—— Tager‐Flusberg, H. and Cohen, D. J. (2000). Understanding Other Minds. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bayer, J. (2004). ‘Decomposing the left periphery—dialectal and cross‐linguistic evidence’, in L. Horst and S. Trissler (eds), The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 59–95.

—— (2005). ‘That‐trace without reference to the subject’. Invited lecture. 20th Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop, Tilburg.

Beaver, D. and B. Clark (2002). ‘The proper treatments of focus sensitivity’, in L. Mikkelsen and C. Potts (eds), WCCFL 21 Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 15–28.

—— and Clark, B. (2003). ‘Always and only: why not all focus sensitive operators are alike’. Natural Language Semantics 11 (4): 323–62.

—— —— Flemming, E., Jaeger, F., and Wolters, M. (2007). ‘When semantics meets phonetics: acoustical studies of second occurrence focus’. Language 83 (2): 245–76.

Becker‐Christensen, C. (ed.) (1995). Nudansk Ordbog & Sprogbrugsleksikon. 15th edn. Copenhagen: Politikens Forlag.

Beckman, M. E. and Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). ‘Intonational structure in Japanese and English’. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–309.

Beghelli, Filippo and Stowell, Tim (1997). ‘The syntax of distributivity and negation’, in Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, Dordrecht: Reidel, 71–108.

Behaghel, Otto (1932). Deutsche Syntax, IV. Heidelberg: Carl Winters.

Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L. (1988). ‘Psych‐verbs and θ‐theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352.

Benmamoun, E. (2000). The Feature Structure of Functional Categories, Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

van den Berg, Rob, Gussenhoven, Carlos, and Rietveld, Toni (1992). ‘Downstep in Dutch: implications for a model’, in Gerhard Docherty and D. Robert Ladd (eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment and Prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–67.

Berman, Arlene and Szamosi, Michael (1972). ‘Observations on sentential stress’. Language 48: 304–25.

Bermúdez‐Otero, Ricardo (2008). ‘Evidence for Chung's generalization’. Paper presented at 16th Manchester Phonology Meeting, Manchester, 22–4 May.

—— (forthcoming). Stratal Optimality Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Besten, Hans den (1983). ‘On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules’, in Werner Abraham (ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 47–131.

Billings, Loren and Rudin, Catherine (1996). ‘Optimality and superiority: a new approach to multiple wh‐ordering’, in Jindřich Toman (ed.), Formal Approaches (p.354) to Slavic Linguistics: The College Park Meeting, 1994. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, 35–60.

Bion, R. H., Benavides, S., and Nespor, M. (submitted). ‘Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants' and adults' memory for speech sequences’.

Bloom, L. (1970). Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bobaljik, J. D. (1995). ‘Morphosyntax: the syntax of verbal inflection’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

—— (2001). ‘Floating quantifiers: handle with care’, in Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma (eds), The Second Glot International State‐of‐the‐Article Book. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter, 107–48.

—— (2002). ‘A‐chains at the PF interface: copies and “covert” movement’. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20 (2): 197–267.

—— and Carnie, A. (1996). ‘A minimalist approach to some problems of Irish word order’, in R. Borsley and I. Roberts (eds), The Syntax of the Celtic Languages: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 223–40.

—— and Jonas, D. (1996). ‘Subject positions and the roles of TP’. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 195–236.

Boeckx, C. (2008). Bare Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Boersma, P. and Weenink, D. (2006). ‘Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.5.2).’

Bolinger, D. (1972). ‘Accent is predictable (if you're a mind‐reader)’. Language 48: 633–44.

Bolton, T. L. (1894). ‘Rhythm’. American Journal of Psychology 6: 145–238.

Booij, Geert (2000 [1996]). ‘The phonology‐morphology interface’, in Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma (eds), The First Glot International State‐of‐the‐Article Book. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 287–305. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

Bošković, Željko (2001). On the Nature of the Syntax–Phonology Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

—— (2002a). ‘Clitics as nonbranching elements and the linear correspondence axiom’. Linguistic Inquiry 33 (2): 329–40.

—— (2002b). ‘On multiple wh‐fronting’. Linguistic Inquiry 33 (3): 351–83.

—— (2004a). ‘Be careful where you float your quantifiers’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 681–742.

—— (2004b). ‘Clitic placement in South Slavic’. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 12 (1–2): 37–90.

—— (2007). ‘On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: an even more minimal theory’. Linguistic Inquiry 38 (4): 589–644.

Bowers, J. (1993). ‘The syntax of predication’. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.

Brandner, E. (2004). ‘Head‐movement in minimalism, and V/2 as force‐marking’, in H. Lohnstein and S. Trissler (eds), Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

(p.355) Brassai, Sámuel (1863–5). ‘A magyar mondatról [About the Hungarian sentence] II‐III’, Akadémiai Értesítő [Academic Newsletter] 3: 3–128, 173–409.

Bresnan, Joan (1971). ‘Sentence stress and syntactic transformations’. Language 47: 257–81.

—— (1972). ‘Stress and syntax: a reply’. Language 48: 326–42.

Brisson, C. (1998). ‘Distributivity, maximality, and floating quantifiers’. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.

Brody, M. (1990). ‘Remarks on the order of elements in the Hungarian focus field’, in Istvan Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian. Szeged, Hungary: Jozsef Attila Tudomanyegyetem, 395–122.

—— (1997). Mirror Theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 9. University College London.

—— and Szabolcsi, Anna (2003). ‘Overt scope in Hungarian’. Syntax 6, 19–51.

Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Brustad, K. (2004). The Syntax of Spoken Arabic: A Comparative Study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian and Kuwaiti Dialects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Bruce, Gösta (1977). ‘Swedish word accent in sentence perspective’. Travaux de l'Institut de Linguistique de Lund 12. Lund: Gleerup.

Buchstaller, I. and Traugott, E. (2006). ‘ “The lady was all demonyak.” Historical aspects of adverbial all’. English Language and Linguistics 10: 345–70.

Carlson, G. (1977) ‘Reference to kinds in English’. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Carlson, K., Clifton, C., Jr, and Frazier, L. (2001). ‘Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment’. Journal of Memory & Language 45: 58–81.

Castro, A. (2006). ‘On possessives in Portuguese’. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Nova de Lisboa & Université Paris VIII.

—— and Costa, J. (2003). ‘Weak forms as X°: prenominal possessives and preverbal adverbs in Portuguese’, in Ana Teresa Pérez‐Leroux and Yves Roberge (eds), Romance Linguistics: Theory and Acquisition. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 95–110.

Chahal, D. (2003). ‘Phonetic cues to prominence in Arabic’. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: 2067–70.

—— and Hellmuth, S. (forthcoming). ‘Comparing the intonational phonology of Lebanese and Egyptian Arabic’. Prosodic Typology. Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cheng, Lisa (1991). ‘On the typology of wh‐questions’. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

—— (1971). ‘Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation’, in D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183–216.

(p.356) Chomsky, Noam (1973). ‘Conditions on transformations’, in Stephen Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 232–86.

—— (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, Noam (1984) Modular Approaches to the Study of the Mind. San Diego: State University Press.

—— (1993). ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory’, in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds), The View From Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.

—— (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

—— (2000). ‘Minimalist inquiries: the framework’, in Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds), Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.

—— (2001a). ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20. Cambridge, MA.: MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.

—— (2001b). ‘Derivation by phase’, in Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.

—— (2004). ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy’, in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104–31.

—— and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

—— —— and Lukoff, Fred (1956). ‘On accent and juncture in English’, in Morris Halle, Horace Lunt, Hugh McLean, and Cornelis van Schooneveld (eds), For Roman Jakobson. Essays on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday. The Hague: Mouton, 65–80. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

Christophe, A., Dupoux, E., Bertoncini, J., and Mehler, J. (1994). ‘Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 1570–80.

—— Mehler, J., and Sebastián‐Gallés, N. (2001). ‘Perception of prosodic boundary correlates by newborn infants’. Infancy 2: 385–94

—— Millotte, S., Bernal, S., and Lidz, J. (2008). ‘Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition’. Language and Speech 51: 61–75

—— Nespor, M., Dupoux, E., Guasti, M.‐T., and Ooyen, B. v. (2003). ‘Reflections on prosodic bootstrapping: its role for lexical and syntactic acquisition’. Developmental Science 6 (2): 213–22.

—— Peperkamp, S., Pallier, C., Block, E., and Mehler, J. (2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access: I. Adult data. Journal of Memory and Language 51: 523–47.

Cinque, G. (1993). ‘A null theory of phrase and compound stress’. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–97.

—— (1994). ‘On the evidence for partial N movement in the Romance DP’, in G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.‐Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, and R. Zanuttini (eds), Paths Toward Universal Grammar. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.

(p.357) —— (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross‐Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cinque, G. (2004). ‘ “Restructuring” and functional structure’, in A. Belletti (ed.), The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol. 3, Structures and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 132–91.

Clahsen, H. and Eisenbeiss, S. (1993). ‘The development of DP in German child language’. Paper presented at the SISSA Encounters in Cognitive Science, Trieste.

Clements, G. N. (1981). ‘The hierarchical representation of tone features’, in G. N. Clements (ed.), Harvard Studies in Phonology, II, 50–108.

Clifton, C., Jr, Frazier, L., and Carlson, K. (2006). ‘Tracking the What and Why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13: 854–61.

Cohen, A. and Erteschik‐Shir, N. (2002). ‘Topic, focus and the interpretation of bare plurals’. Natural Language Semantics 10: 125–65.

Cole, Jennifer (1995). ‘The cycle in phonology’, in John Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 70–113.

Collins, C. (1997). Local Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press

Comrie, B. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cooper, G. and Meyer, L. (1960). The Rhythmic Structure of Music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Costa, J. (1998). ‘Word order variation. A constraint‐based approach’. Ph.D. dissertation, Leiden University.

—— (2002). ‘VOS in Portuguese: Arguments against an analysis in terms of remnant movement’, in A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, S. Barbiers, and H.‐M. Gärtner (eds), Dimensions of Movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 69–89.

—— (2004). Subject Positions and Interfaces. The Case of European Portuguese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

—— (2008). ‘A focus‐binding conspiracy. Left‐to‐right merge, scrambling and binary structure in European Portuguese’. Ms., Universidade Nova de Lisboa.

—— (2009). ‘A focus‐binding conspiracy. Left‐to‐right merge, scrambling and binary structure in European Portuguese’. Forthcoming in J. van Craenenbroeck (ed.), Alternatives to Cartography. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

—— and Szendroi, K. (2006). ‘Acquisition of focus marking in European Portuguese. Evidence for a unified approach’, in V. Torrens and L. Escobar (eds), The Acquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 319–29.

Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Csirmaz, Anikó (2006). ‘Particles and a two‐component theory of aspect’, in Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Event Structure and the Left Periphery. Studies on Hungarian. Dordrecht: Springer, 107–28.

Cutler, A., Dahan, D., and Donselaar, W. A. van (1997). ‘Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review’. Language and Speech 40 (2): 141–202.

(p.358) Cutler, A. and Swinney, D. (1986). ‘Prosody and the development of comprehension’. Journal of Child Language 14: 145–67.

Dauer, R. (1983). ‘Stress timing and syllable timing reanalyzed’. Journal of Phonetics 11: 51–62.

Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 385 million words, 1990‐present. Available online at <http://www.americancorpus.org>.

Dayal, Veneeta (2003). ‘Bare nominals: non‐specific and contrastive readings under scrambling’, in Simin Karimi (ed.), Word Order and Scrambling. London: Blackwell, 67–90.

Dehé, N. (2005). ‘The optimal placement of up and ab: a comparison’. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 8: 185–224.

Diesing, M. (1988). ‘Bare plural subjects and the stage/individual contrast’, in M. Krifka (ed.), Genericity in Language: Proceedings of the 1988 Tübingen Conference. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.

Diesing, Molly (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dik, S. et al. (1981). ‘On the typology of focus phenomena’, in T. Hoekstra (ed.), Perspectives on Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.

Dikken, Marcel den (2007). ‘Phase extension: contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction’. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 1–41.

Doetjes, J. (1997). Quantifiers and Selection: On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch, and English. HIL Dissertations 32. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

Dowty, D. (1987). ‘A note on collective predicates, distributive predicates and “all” ’, in F. Marshall, A. Miller, and Z.‐S. Zhang (eds), Proceedings of the Third Eastern State Conference on Linguistics. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

—— and Brodie, B. (1984). ‘A semantic analysis of “floated” quantifiers in a transformationless grammar’, in Mark Cobler, Susan MacKaye, and Michael Wescoat (eds), Proceedings of the Third West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI, 75–90.

Dryer, M. S. (1992). ‘The Greenbergian word order correlations’. Language 68(1): 81–138.

—— (2005). ‘Order of subject, object and verb’, in M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, and B. Comrie (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, ch. 81. Available online at <http://wals.info/feature/81>. Accessed on July 8, 2009.

Duarte, I. (1987). ‘A construção de Topicalização em Português Europeu: Regência, Ligação e Condições sobre Movimento’. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa.

Du Bois, J. W., Chafe, W. L., Meyer, C., and Thompson, S. A. (2000). Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.

—— —— —— —— and Martey, N. (2003). Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.

—— and Englebretson, R. (2004). Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 3. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.

(p.359) Dupoux, E. and Peperkamp, S. (2002). ‘Fossil markers of language development: phonological deafnesses in adult speech processing’, in B. Laks and J. Durand (eds), Phonetics, Phonology, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 168–90.

Egedi, Barbara (2008). ‘Adverbial (dis)ambiguities. Syntactic and prosodic features of ambiguous predicational adverbs’, in Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Adverbs and Adverbial Adjuncts at the Interfaces. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

É. Kiss, Katalin (1987). Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht: Reidel.

—— (1991). ‘Logical structure in syntactic structure: the case of Hungarian’, in James C.‐T. Huang and Robert May (eds), Logical Structure and Syntactic Structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 111–47.

—— (1994). ‘Sentence structure and word order’, in Katalin É. Kiss and Ferenc Kiefer (eds), Hungarian Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 1–90.

—— (2002). The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— (2006). ‘Focussing as predication’, in Valéria Molnár and Susanne Winkler (eds), Architecture of Focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 169–96.

—— (2008a). ‘Free word order, (non‐)configurationality, and phases’. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 441–75.

—— (2008b). ‘Substitution or adjunction? Quantifiers and adverbials in the Hungarian sentence’. Lingua, forthcoming.

—— (2008c). ‘The Hungarian VP revisited’, in Christopher Piñón and Szilárd Szentgyörgyi (eds), Approaches to Hungarian 10, Papers from the Veszprém Conference. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 31–58.

É. Kiss, Katalin (ed.), (2008d). Adverbs and Adverbial Adjuncts at the Interfaces. Interface Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

El Zarka, D. (2008). ‘Leading, linking and closing tones and tunes in Egyptian Arabic—what a simple intonation system tells us about the nature of intonation’. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Arabic Linguistics Society, Michigan, March 2008.

Endress, A. D., Dehaene‐Lambertz, G., and Mehler, J. (2007). ‘Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars’. Cognition 105 (3): 577–614.

—— and Mehler, J. (under review). ‘Primitive computations in speech processing’.

—— Scholl, B. J., and Mehler, J. (2005). ‘The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134 (3): 406–19.

Engberg‐Pedersen, E., et al. (eds), (2005). Dansk Funktionel Lingvistik: En Helhedsforståelse af Forholdet mellem Sprogstruktur, Sprogbrug og Kognition. København: Kopiservice Humaniora, Københavns Universitet.

Engdahl, E. and Vallduví, E. (1994). ‘Information packaging and grammar architecture: a constraint‐based approach’, in E. Engdahl (ed.), Integrating Information Structure into Constraint‐Based and Categorial Approaches. DYANA‐2 Report R.1.3.B. Amsterdam: HLLC, 39–79.

Epstein, Samuel, Groat, E. M., Kawashima, R., and Kitahara, H. (1998). A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ernst, T. (2002). The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(p.360) Erteschik‐Shir, N. (1973). ‘On the nature of island constraints’. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

—— (1979) ‘Discourse constraints on dative movement’. Syntax and Semantics 5 (12). Also in T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 441–67.

—— (1997). The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— (2005a). ‘The sound patterns of syntax: the case of object shift’. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (1/2): 47–94.

—— (2005b). ‘What is syntax?’. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (1/2): 263–74.

—— and Strahov, Natalia (2004). ‘Focus structure architecture and P‐syntax’. Lingua 114 (3): 301–23.

Estling Vannestål, M. (2004). ‘Syntactic variation in English quantified noun phrases with all, whole, both and half’. Doctoral dissertation, Växjö Universitet.

Fanselow, Gisbert (2004). ‘Cyclic phonology‐syntax interaction: movement to first position in German’. Information Structures 1. ISIS: Working Papers of the SFB 632. Potsdam, 1–42.

—— and Lenertová, Denisa (2008). ‘Left peripheral focus: mismatches between syntax and information structure’. Ms., University of Potsdam and University of Leipzig.

Féry, C. (2006). ‘The fallacy of invariant correlates of information structure’, in C. Féry, G. Fanselow, and M. Krifka (eds), The Notions of Information Structure, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, 6. Potsdam: Universitaetsverlag Potsdam.

—— and Drenhaus, Heiner (2008). ‘Single prosodic phrasing’, in Interdisciplinary Studies in Information Structure 10. Working Papers of the SFB 632. Potsdam: Universitaetsverlag Potsdam, 1–44.

—— Fanselow, G., and Krifka, M. (2006). ‘The notions of information structure’, in Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, 6. Potsdam: Universitaetsverlag Potsdam.

—— and Herbst, L. (2004). ‘German sentence accent revisited’, in S. Ishihara, M. Schmitz, and A. Schwarz (eds), Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS). 1. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.

—— and Ishihara, Shinichiro (2009a). ‘How focus and givenness shape prosody’, in M. Zimmermann and C. Féry (eds), Information Structure from Different Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— —— (2009b). ‘The phonology of second occurrence focus’. Journal of Linguistics 45 (2).

—— and Ketner, Gerrit (2008). ‘The prosody of grouping names in German and Hindi’. Ms. Potsdam.

—— and Kügler, Frank (2008). ‘Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German’. Journal of Phonetics 36: 680–703.

—— Paslawska, Alla, and Fanselow, Gisbert (2007). ‘Nominal split constructions in Ukrainian’. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 15 (1): 3–48.

(p.361) —— and Samek‐Lodovici, Vieri (2006). ‘Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci’, Language 82 (1): 131–50.

—— and Truckenbrodt, Hubert (2005). ‘Sisterhood and tonal scaling’, in Studia Linguistica special issue ‘Boundaries in intonational phonology’, 59 (2/3): 223–43.

Fisher, C. and Tokura, H. (1996). ‘Prosody in speech to infants: direct and indirect acoustic cues to syntactic structure’, in E. Morgan, L. James, and Katherine E. Demuth (eds), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 343–63.

Fitzpatrick, J. (2006). ‘The syntactic and semantic roots of floating quantification’. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

Fox, Danny (2003). ‘On logical form’, in R. Hendrick (ed.), Minimalist Syntax. London: Blackwell.

—— and Pesetsky, David (2005). ‘Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure’. Theoretical Linguistics 31 (1–2): 1–46.

Franks, Steven (1998). ‘Clitics in Slavic’. Position paper presented at the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop, Spencer, Indiana, June 1998. Available online at <http://www.indiana.edu/∼slavconf/linguistics/download.html>.

—— (2000). ‘Clitics at the interface’, in Frits Beukema and Marcel den Dikken (eds), Clitic Phenomena in European Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–46.

—— (2005). ‘Adverb interpolation in the Bulgarian clitic cluster’, in Robert Rothstein, Ernest Scatton, and Charles Townsend (eds), A Festschrift for Charles Gribble. Bloomington, IN: Slavica, 117–33.

—— (2006a). ‘Agnostic movement’, in C. Davis, A. R. Deal, and Y. Zabbai (eds), Proceedings of NELS XXXVI, 1: 267–78.

—— (2006b). ‘Another look at li placement in Bulgarian’. The Linguistic Review 23 (2): 161–211.

—— (2007). ‘Deriving discontinuity’, in Franc Marušić and Rok Žaucer (eds), Studies in Formal Slavic Linguistics. Frankfurt‐am‐Main: Peter Lang, 103–20.

—— (2008). ‘Clitic placement, prosody, and the Bulgarian verbal complex’. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 16 (1): 91–137.

—— and Bošković, Željko (2001). ‘An argument for Multiple Spell‐Out’. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (1): 174–83.

—— and King, Tracy Holloway (2000). A Handbook of Slavic Clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frascarelli, M. (2000). The Syntax‐Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Frazier, L., Carlson, K., and Clifton, C. (2006). ‘Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension’. TICS 10 (6): 244–9.

Frey, Werner (2004). ‘A medial topic position for German’. Linguistische Berichte 198: 153–90.

Frota, S. (1999). ‘Prosody and focus in European Portuguese’. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa.

(p.362) Frota, S. and Vigário, M. (2002). ‘Efeitos de peso no Português Europeu’, in M. H. Mateus and C. N. Correia (eds), Saberes no Tempo. Homenagem a Maria Henriqueta Costa Campos. Lisboa: Colibri, 315–33.

Gary, J. O. and Gamal‐Eldin, S. (1981). Cairene Egyptian Colloquial Arabic. London: Croom Helm.

Gervain, J., Macagno, F., Cogoi, S., Peña, M., and Mehler, J. (2008). ‘The neonate brain detects speech structure’. PNAS 105 (37): 14222–7.

—— Nespor, M., Mazuka, R., Horie, R., and Mehler, J. (2008). ‘Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese‐Italian crosslinguistic study’. Cognitive Psychology 57: 56–74.

Giegerich, Heinz (1999). Lexical Strata in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Golden, Marija and Milojević Sheppard, Milena (2000). ‘Slovene pronominal clitics’, in Frits Beukema and Marcel den Dikken (eds), Clitic Phenomena in European Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 191–207.

Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., and Gilliom, L.A. (1993). ‘Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse’. Cognitive Science 17: 311–47.

Gout, A., Christophe, A. and Morgan, J. (2004). ‘Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access: II. Infant data’. Journal of Memory and Language 51: 547–67.

Greenberg, J. (1963). ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements’, in J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 73–113.

Grice, H. P. (1957). ‘Meaning’. The Philosophical Review 66: 377–88.

Grice, M., D'Imperio, M., Savino, M. and Avesani, C. (2005). ‘Strategies for intonation labelling across varieties of Italian’, in S.‐A. Jun (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 362–89.

Gundel, J. K. (1988). ‘Universals of topic‐comment structure’, in M. Hammand, E. Moravcsik, and J. Wirth (eds), Studies in Syntactic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 209–39.

Gussenhoven, Carlos (1983a). ‘Testing the reality of focus domains’. Language and Speech 26: 61–80.

—— (1983b). ‘Focus, mode and the nucleus’. Journal of Linguistics 19: 377–417.

—— (1984). On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.

—— (1992). ‘Sentence accents and argument structure’, in I. Roca (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar. Berlin and New York: Foris, 79–106.

—— (2004) The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Győri, M. (2003), Domain Specificity in Cognition and Language: Understanding Irony in High‐Functioning Autism. Doctoral dissertation, ELTE University Budapest.

Haider, H. and Prinzhorn, M. (eds), (1986). Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.

Hale, K. and Keyser, J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

(p.363) Halle, Morris (1978). ‘Formal vs. functional considerations in phonology’. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 8: 123–34. Reprinted in B. Brogyányi (ed.), Studies in Diachronic, Synchronic any Typological Linguistics: Festschrift for O. Szemerényi. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 325–41.

—— (1986). ‘On the phonology‐morphology interface’. Ms., MIT.

—— (1997). ‘On stress and accent in Indo‐European’. Language 73: 275–313.

—— Harris, James, and Vergnaud, Jean‐Roger (1991). ‘A reexamination of the stress erasure convention and Spanish stress’. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 141–59.

—— and Kenstowicz, Michael (1991). ‘The Free Element Condition and cyclic versus non‐cyclic stress’. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 457–501.

—— and Matushansky, Ora (2006). ‘The morphophonology of Russian adjectival inflection’. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 351–404.

—— and Nevins, Andrew (forthcoming). ‘Rule application in phonology’, in Eric Raimy and Charles Cairns (eds), Architecture and Representations in Phonological Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

—— and Vergnaud, J.‐R. (1987). An Essay on Stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

Halliday, M. (1967). ‘Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part II’. Journal of Linguistics 3: 199–244.

—— (1970). A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hamblin, C. L. (1973). ‘Questions in Montague English’, Foundations of Language 10: 41–53.

Happé, F. (1993). ‘Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: a test of relevance theory’. Cognition 48: 101–19.

Harada, K. (1972). ‘Constraints on Wh‐Q Binding’. Descriptive and Applied Linguistics 5: 180–206.

Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (eds) (2005). The World Atlas of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hay, J. S. and Diehl, R. L. (2007). ‘Perception of rhythmic grouping: testing the iambic/trochaic law’. Perception & Psychophysics 69 (1): 113–22.

Hayes, B. (1986). A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules. New York: Garland Press.

—— (1989). ‘The prosodic hierarchy in meter’, in P. Kiparsky and G. Youmans (eds), Phonetics and Phonology. Rhythm and Meter. New York: Academic Press, 201–60.

—— (1995). Metrical Stress Theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Helgå, H. B. (2008). ‘Negasjon i norsk som andrespråk’. Master's thesis. NTNU, Trondheim.

Hellan, L. (1994). ‘A note on clitics in Norwegian’, in Clitics: Their Origin, Status and Position. EUROTYP Working Papers (Theme Group 8), 6. Programme in Language Typology, European Science Foundation, 80–90.

Hellmuth, S. (2005). ‘No de‐accenting in (or of) phrases: evidence from Arabic for cross‐linguistic and cross‐dialectal prosodic variation’, in S. Frota, M. Vigario, and M. J. Freitas (eds), Prosodies (with Special Reference to Iberian Languages). Phonetics and Phonology Series. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 99–121.

(p.364) Hellmuth, S. (2006a). ‘Focus‐related pitch range manipulation (and peak alignment effects) in Egyptian Arabic’, in R. Hoffmann and H. Mixdorff (eds), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006. Dresden: TUD Press Verlag der Wissenschaften GmbH, 410–13.

—— (2006b). ‘Intonational pitch accent distribution in Egyptian Arabic’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, SOAS.

—— (2007a). ‘The foot as the domain of tonal alignment of intonational pitch accents’. Proceedings of the 16th ICPhS, Saarbruecken, Germany.

—— (2007b). ‘The relationship between prosodic structure and pitch accent distribution: evidence from Egyptian Arabic’. The Linguistic Review 24: 291–316.

Hendriks, P. (2004). ‘Either, both and neither in coordinate structures’, in A. ter Meulen and W. Abraham (eds), The Composition of Meaning: From Lexeme to Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 115–38.

Heycock, C. (1994). ‘Focus projection in Japanese’. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 24: 157–71.

—— (2008). ‘Japanese ‐wa, ‐ga, and information structure’, in S. Miyagawa and M. Saito (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 54–83.

Higginbotham, J. (1993). ‘Questions’, in K. Hale and J. Keyser (eds), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Kemler, D., Nelson, G., Jusczyk, P. W., Cassidy, K. W., Druss, B., and Kennedy, L. (1987). ‘Clauses are perceptual units for young infants’. Cognition 26 (3): 269–86.

Holmberg, A. (1993). ‘Two subject positions in IP in Mainland Scandinavian’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 52. Department of Scandinavian Linguistics, University of Lund, 29–41.

—— and Platzack, C. (1995). The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hooper, J. B. and Thompson, S. A. (1973). ‘On the applicability of root transformations’. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–79.

Hornstein, Norbert, Nunes, Jairo, and Grohmann, Kleanthes (2005). Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Horvath, Julia. 2006. ‘Separating “Focus Movement” from focus’, in V. S. S. Karimi et al. (eds), Clever and Right: A Festschrift for Joe Emonds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hualde, J. I. (2007). ‘Stress removal and stress addition in Spanish’. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 6: 58–89.

Huang, C.‐T. J. (1982). ‘Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

Hyman, L. M, Katamba, F., and Walusimbi, L. (1987). ‘Luganda and the Strict Layer Hypothesis’. Phonology Yearbook 4: 87–108.

Ibrahim, O. A. G., El‐Ramly, S. H., and Abdel‐Kader, N. S. (2001). ‘A model of F0 contour for Arabic affirmative and interrogative sentences’. Mansoura University, Egypt: 18th National Radio Science Conference, 517–24.

(p.365) Inkelas, Sharon (1998). ‘The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: a case study of dominance effects’. Yearbook of Morphology 1997: 121–55.

—— and Zec, D. (1993). ‘Auxiliary reduction without empty categories: a prosodic account’. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 8: 205–53.

Ishihara, Shinichiro (2007). ‘Major phrase, focus intonation and multiple spell‐out (MaP, FI, MSO)’. The Linguistic Review 24: 137–67.

—— and Féry, Caroline (in prep.). ‘Syntactic and prosodic realization of information structure in German, Hungarian and Japanese’. Ms. Potsdam.

Itô, Junko and Mester, Armin (1995). ‘Japanese phonology’, in John Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 816–38.

—— —— (1999). ‘The phonological lexicon’, in Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 62–100.

—— —— (2007). ‘Prosodic categories and recursion’. Handout of a talk presented at WPSI3, Indiana University, September 14, 2007.

Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jacobs, Joachim (1993). ‘Integration’, in Marga Reis (ed.), Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 63–116.

Jaeger, F. and Wagner, M. (2003). ‘Association with focus and linear order in German’. The Semantics Archive, 26 pp.

Jelinek, E. (2002). ‘Agreement, clitics and focus in Egyptian Arabic’, in J. Ouhalla and U. Shlonsky (eds), Themes in Arabic and Hebrew Syntax. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Berlin: Springer, 71–105.

Johannessen, J. B. (2005). ‘The syntax of correlative adverbs’. Lingua 115: 419–43.

Jun, S.‐A. (2005). ‘Prosodic typology’, in S.‐A. Jun (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 430–58.

Jun, S.‐A. (ed.), (2005). Prosodic Typology. The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jusczyk P. W., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Nelson, D. G., Kennedy, L. J., Woodward, A., and Piwoz, J. (1992). ‘Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants’. Cognitive Psychology 24 (2): 252–93.

—— and Krumhansl, C. L. (1993). ‘Pitch and rhythmic patterns affecting infants’ sensitivity to musical phrase structure’. Journal of Experimental Psychology and Human Perception Performance 9 (3): 627–40.

Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan (2004). ‘The syntax of sentential stress’. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.

Kaisse, Ellen and Shaw, Patricia (1985). ‘On the theory of Lexical Phonology’. Phonology Yearbook 2: 1–30. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

Kálmán, L. and Nádasdy, Á. (1994). ‘A hangsúly’ [Stress], in Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 2, Fonológia [Structural Hungarian Grammar 2, Phonology]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 393–467.

(p.366) Karimi, Simin. (2003). ‘On object positions, specificity, and Scrambling in Persian’, in Simin Karimi (ed.), Word Order and Scrambling. London: Blackwell, 91–124.

Karins, K., Liberman, M., McLemore, C., and Rowson, E. (2002). CallHome Egyptian Arabic Speech Supplement LDC2002S37. Philadelphia, Linguistic Data Consortium.

Kaye, Jonathan (1992). ‘On the interaction of theories of Lexical Phonology and theories of phonological phenomena’, in Uli Dressler, Hans Luschützky, Oskar Pfeiffer, and John Rennison (eds), Phonologica 1988. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–55. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

—— (1995). ‘Derivations and interfaces’, in Jacques Durand and Francis Katamba (eds), Frontiers of Phonology. London and New York: Longman. Also in SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 3 (1993): 90–126, 289–332. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

Kayne, R. S. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kean, Mary‐Louise (1974). ‘The strict cycle in phonology’. Linguistic Inquiry 5: 179–203.

Keating, P., Cho, T., Fougeron, C., and Hsu, C. (2003). ‘Domain‐initial articulatory strengthening in four languages’, in J. Local, R. Ogden, and R. Temple (eds), Phonetic Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 143–61.

Kemler, D., Nelson, G., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Jusczyk, P., and Wright‐Cassidy, K. (1989). ‘How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning’. Journal of Child Language 16 (1): 55–68.

Keyser, S. J. (1968). ‘Review of Sven Jacobson “Adverbial positions in English” ’. Language 44: 357–74.

Kiparsky, Paul (1968–1973). ‘How abstract is phonology?’ in Osamu Fujimura (ed.), Manuscript circulated since 1968 and published 1973 in Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory. Tokyo: TEC, 5–56.

—— (1982a). ‘From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology’, in Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith (eds), The Structure of Phonological Representations I. Dordrecht: Foris, 131–75. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

—— (1982b). ‘Lexical morphology and phonology’, in In‐Seok Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Seoul: Hanshin, 3–91. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

—— (1993). ‘Blocking in nonderived environments’, in Sharon Hargus and Ellen Kaisse (eds), Studies in Lexical Phonology. San Diego: Academic Press, 277–313.

—— (2000). ‘Opacity and cyclicity’. The Linguistic Review 17: 351–65.

—— (2003). ‘Syllables and moras in Arabic’, in Caroline Féry and Ruben van de Vijver (eds), The Syllable in Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147–82.

Kiss, K. (1998). ‘Identificational focus versus informational focus’. Language 74 (2): 245–73.

Kisseberth, C. W. and Abasheikh, M. I. (1974). ‘Vowel length in Chi Mwi:ni—a case study of the role of grammar in phonology’, in A. Bruck, A. Fox, and M. W. La Galy (p.367) (eds), Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 193–209.

Kjelgaard, M. M. and Speer, S. R. (1999). ‘Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity’. Journal of Memory & Language 40: 153–94.

Kornfilt, Jaklin 2003. ‘Scrambling, subscrambling, and case in Turkish’, in Simin Karimi (ed.), Word Order and Scrambling. London: Blackwell, 125–54.

Koster, J. (1975). ‘Dutch as an SOV Language’. Linguistic Analysis 1: 111–36.

Kratzer, A. (1988). ‘Stage‐level and individual‐level predicates’, in M. Krifka (ed.), Genericity in Language: Proceedings of the 1988 Tübingen Conference. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.

—— and Selkirk, Elizabeth O. (2007). ‘Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs’. The Linguistic Review 24: 93–135.

Krifka, M. (2006). ‘Basic notions of information structure’, in C. Féry, G. Fanselow, and M. Krifka (eds), The Notions of Information Structure. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6. Potsdam: Institutsverlag Universitaet Potsdam.

Krifka, Manfred (1984). Fokus, Topik, syntaktische Struktur und semantische Interpretation. Ms., University of Tübingen.

Krumhansl, C. L. and Jusczyk, P. W. (1990). ‘Infants' perception of phrase structure in music’. Psychological Science 1: 70–3.

Kuno, S. (1973). The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kuroda, S.‐Y. (1965). ‘Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

—— (1972). ‘The categorical and the thetic judgment: evidence from Japanese syntax’. Foundations of Language 9: 153–85.

—— (1988) ‘Whether we agree or not: a comparative syntax of English and Japanese’. Linguisticae Investigationes 12: 1–47.

Ladd, D. R. (1980). The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

—— (1988). ‘Declination “reset” and the hierarchical organization of utterances’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84: 530–44.

—— (1990). ‘Metrical representation of pitch register’, in J. Kingston and M. Beckman (eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 35–57.

—— (1996). Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Laenzlinger, Christopher 2005. ‘A feature‐based theory of adverb syntax’, in J. R. Austin, S. Engelberg, and G. Rauh (eds), The Interplay between Meaning, Context, and Syntactic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 205–52.

Lakoff, George (1972). ‘The global nature of the Nuclear Stress Rule’. Language 48, 285–303.

Lambova, Mariana (2004). ‘On information structure and clausal architecture: evidence from Bulgarian’. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.

(p.368) Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—— (2001). ‘A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions’. Linguistics 39 (3): 463–516.

Laniran, Yetunde O. and Clements, George N. (2003). ‘Downstep and high raising: interacting factors in Yoruba tone production’. Journal of Phonetics 31: 203–50.

Lasnik, Howard (1999). ‘On feature strength: Three minimalist approaches to overt movement’. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (2): 197–217.

Lebeaux, D. (1988) ‘Language acquisition and the form of the grammar’. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Legendre, Geraldine (2003). ‘What are clitics? Evidence from Balkan languages’. Phonological Studies 6: 89–96.

Lehiste, I. (1973). ‘Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity’. Glossa 7: 107–22.

Liberman, M. (1975 [1978/9]). ‘The intonational system of English’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA (published by Indiana University Linguistic Club, Bloomington, IN, 1978; Garland, New York/London, 1979).

—— and Pierrehumbert, J. (1984). ‘Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length’, in M. Aronoff and R. T. Oehrle (eds), Language Sound Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 157–233.

—— and Prince, A. (1977). ‘On stress and linguistic rhythm’. Linguistic Inquiry 8 (2): 249–336.

Low, E. L. and Grabe, E. (2002). ‘Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis’, in C. Gussenhoven and N. Warner (eds), Laboratory Phonology 7 Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 515–46.

Mahajan, A. (1990). ‘The A/A‐bar distinction and movement theory’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

Marácz, László. 1989. ‘Asymmetries in Hungarian’. Ph.D. dissertation, Groningen University.

Marslen‐Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., and Lee, C. S. (1992). ‘Prosodic effects in minimal attachment’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 45A (1): 73–87.

Martins, F. and Mascarenhas, I. (2004), ‘Efeitos de Peso: Uma Nova Perspectiva’, in Actas do XIX Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística. Lisboa: APL, 535–45.

Mascaró, Joan (1976). ‘Catalan phonology and the phonological cycle’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

McCarthy, John J. and Prince, Alan S. (1990). ‘Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 209–83.

McCloskey, J. (1996). ‘On the scope of verb‐movement in Irish’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 47–104.

—— (2005). ‘Questions and questioning in a local English’, in R. Zanuttini et al. (eds), Cross‐Linguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

(p.369) McMahon, April (2000). Lexical Phonology and the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mehler, J., Lambertz, G., Jusczyk, P. W., and Amiel‐Tison, C. (1987). ‘Discrimination de la langue maternelle par le nouveau‐né’. C. R. Académie des Sciences de Paris 303 (15): 637–40.

—— —— —— —— (1988). ‘A precursor of language acquisition in young infants’. Cognition 29: 143–78.

—— and Nespor, M. (2003). Linguistic rhythm and the acquisition of language, in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Meinunger, A. (2005). ‘Remarks on the verb second phonomenon, the nature of volitional predicates, “konjunktiv” and speculations on illocution’. Berlin: ZAS.

—— (2006), ‘The discourse status of subordinate sentences and some implications for syntax and pragmatics’, in V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds), The Architecture of Focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Meisel, J. M. (ed.), (1992). The Acquisition of Verb Placement. Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

Merchant, Jason (2001). The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—— (2007). ‘Three kinds of ellipsis: syntactic, semantic, pragmatic?’ Ms. University of Chicago.

Millotte, S. (2005). ‘Le rôle de la prosodie dans le traitement syntaxique adulte et l'acquisition de la syntaxe’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris.

—— René, A., Wales, R., and Christophe, A. (2008). ‘Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the on‐line syntactic analysis of spoken sentences’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 34: 874–85.

—— Wales, R., and Christophe, A. (2007). ‘Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax’. Language and Cognitive Processes 22: 898–909.

Mitchell, T. F. (1993). Pronouncing Arabic 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Mittwoch, A. (1976). ‘Grammar and illocutionary force’. Lingua 40: 21–42.

—— (1977). ‘How to refer to one's own words: speech‐act modifying adverbials and the performative analysis’. Journal of Linguistics 13: 153–368.

—— (1979). ‘Final parentheticals with English questions—their illucutionary function and grammar’. Journal of Pragmatics 3: 401–12.

Miyagawa, S. (2001). ‘The EPP, scrambling, and wh‐in‐situ’, in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 293–338.

—— (2003). ‘A‐movement scrambling and options without optionality’, in S. Karimi (ed.), Word Order and Scrambling. Oxford: Blackwell, 177–200.

Mohanan, Karuvannur (1982). ‘Lexical phonology’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

—— (1986). The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

(p.370) Moon, C., Cooper, R. P., and Fifer, W. (1993). ‘Two‐day‐olds prefer their native language’. Infant Behavior and Development 16: 495–500.

Morgan, J. L. (1994). ‘Converging measures of speech segmentation in preverbal infants’. Infant Behavior and Development 17: 387–400.

—— and Demuth K. (eds) (1996). Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Moro, Andrea (2000). Dynamic Antisymmetry. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 38. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mughazy, M. (2009). ‘The information structure of existential sentences in Egyptian Arabic’, in J. Owens and A. Elgibali (eds), Information Structure in Spoken Arabic. Oxford: Routledge.

Müller, K. E. (1998). ‘German focus particles and their influence on intonation’. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stuttgart.

Nakanishi, K. (forthcoming). ‘Semantic properties of Split Topicalization in German’, in C. Maienborn and A. Woellstein‐Leisten (eds), Events in Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Nava, E. and Zubizarreta, M. L. (2008). ‘Order of acquisition of prosodic prominence patterns: evidence from L1 Spanish/L2 English Speech’. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (Galana) 3, University of Connecticut, Storrs (September 4–6, 2008).

Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., and Mehler, J. (1998). ‘Language discrimination by newborns: toward an understanding of the role of rhythm’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (3): 756–66.

—— Kemler‐Nelson, D., Jusczyk, P., and Jusczyk, A. (2000). ‘Six‐month‐olds' detection of clauses embedded in continuous speech: effects of prosodic well‐formdness’. Infancy 1 (1): 123–47.

Neeleman, Ad and Reinhart, T. (1998). ‘Scrambling and the PF‐Interface’, in W. Geuder and M. Butt (eds), Projecting from the Lexicon. Standford, CA: CSLI Publications.

—— —— (1999). ‘Scrambling and the PF Interface’, in Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder (eds), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Nemoto, N. (1993). ‘Chains and case positions: a study from scrambling in Japanese’. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

Nespor, M., Guasti, M. T., and Christophe, A. (1996). ‘Selecting word order: the Rhythmic Activation Principle’, in U. Kleinhenz (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1–26.

—— Peña, M., and Mehler, J. (2003). ‘On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition’. Lingue & Linguaggi 2: 203–31.

—— Shukla, M., Vijver, R. van de, Avesani, C., Schraudolf, H., and Donati, C. (2008). ‘Different phrasal prominence realization in VO and OV languages’. Lingue e Linguaggio 7 (2): 1–28.

(p.371) Nespor, M. and Vogel, I. (1982). ‘Prosodic domains of external sandhi rules’, in H. v. d. Hulst and Norval Smith (eds), The Structure of Phonological Representations. Dordrecht: Foris, 225–55.

—— —— (1983). ‘Prosodic structure above the word’, in A. Cutler and D. R. Ladd (eds), Prosody: Models and Measurements. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 123–40.

—— —— (1986 [2008]). Prosodic Phonology. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter. (Reedition of Nespor and Vogel (1986), Dordrecht: Foris, with a new Introduction.)

Newell, Heather and Scheer, Tobias (2007). ‘Procedural first’. Paper presented at the 38th Poznań Linguistic Meeting, Poznań, 13–16 September. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

Nishigauchi, T. (1990). Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Springer.

Norlin, K. (1989). ‘A preliminary description of Cairo Arabic intonation of statements and questions’. Speech Transmission Quarterly Progress and Status Report 1: 47–9.

O'Connor, J. D. and Arnold, G. F. (1961). The Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman.

Odden, David (1993). ‘Interaction between modules in lexical phonology’, in Sharon Hargus and Ellen Kaisse (eds), Studies in Lexical Phonology. New York: Academic Press, 111–44.

Olsvay, Csaba. 2000. ‘Formális jegyek egyeztetése a magyar nemsemleges mondatokban’ [Agreement features in non‐neutral Hungarian sentences], in László Büky and Márta Maleczki (eds), A mai magyar nyelv leírásának újabb módszerei [New Methods in Analyzing Modern Hungarian] 4. Szeged: Szegedi Tudományegyetem, 119–51.

Oshita, H. (1997). ‘The unaccusative trap: L2 acquisition of English intransitive verbs’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, USC.

Østbø, C. B. (2003). ‘Generativ analyse av norske setningsadverbialer: et kritisk blikk’. Hovedfagsoppgave. NTNU, Trondheim.

Pater, Joe (2000). ‘Nonuniformity in English stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints’. Phonology 17: 237–74.

—— (forthcoming). ‘Morpheme‐specific phonology: constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution’, in Steve Parker (ed.), Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation. London: Equinox.

Peña, M., Bion, R. H., and Nespor, M. (in progress). ‘How modality‐specific is the iambic‐trochaic law? Evidence from vision’.

—— Bonatti, L., Nespor, M., and Mehler, J. (2002). ‘Signal‐driven computations in speech processing’. Science 298: 604–7.

Peperkamp, S., Le Calvez, R., Nadal, J. P., and Dupoux, E. (2006). ‘The acquisition of allophonic rules: statistical learning with linguistic constraints’. Cognition 101: B31–B41.

Pereltsvaig, Asya (2007). ‘Split phrases in colloquial Russian: a corpus study’, in Richard Compton et al. (eds), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Toronto Meeting. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Materials, 245–63.

Perlmutter, D. (1972). ‘Evidence for shadow pronouns in French relativization’, in Paul Peranteau et al. (eds), The Chicago Which Hunt. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, 73–105.

(p.372) Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A., and Leekam, S. (1989). ‘Explorations of the autistic child's theory of mind: knowledge, belief, and communication’. Child Development 60: 689–700.

Pesetsky, David (1979). ‘Russian morphology and lexical theory’. Ms, MIT. Available at <http://web.mit.edu/linguistics/www/pesetsky/russmorph.pdf>.

Peti‐Stantić, Anita (2007). ‘Wackernagelovo pravilo—norma ili mogućnost’, in Branko Kuna (ed.), Sintaktičke kategorije. Zagreb: Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, 173–87.

Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). ‘The phonology and phonetics of English intonation’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

—— and Beckman, Mary E. (1988). Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

—— and Hirschberg, J. (1990). ‘The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse’, in Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack (eds), Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 271–311.

Pinón, Christopher (1995). ‘Around the progressive in Hungarian’, in István Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian 5. Szeged: JATE, 155–9.

Pitt, M. A., Dilley, L., Johnson, K., Kiesling, S., Raymond, W., Hume, E., and Fosler‐Lussier, E. (2006). Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University.

Pollock, J.‐Y. (1989). ‘Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of VP’. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.

Poser, William J. (1984). ‘The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese’. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Prince, A. and P. Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report 2.

Ramus, F. (2002). ‘Acoustic correlates of linguistic rhythm: perspectives’, in Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002. Aix‐en‐Provence, France.

—— Hauser, M. D., Miller, C., Morris, D., and Mehler, J. (2000). ‘Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton‐top tamarin monkeys’. Science 288 (5464): 349–51.

—— Nespor, M., and Mehler, J. (1999). ‘Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal’. Cognition 73 (3): 265–92.

Reinhart, T. (1981). ‘Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics’. Philosophica 27, Special Issue on Pragmatic Theory.

—— (1995). Interface Strategies. OTS Working papers in Linguistics, Utrecht University.

—— (1999). ‘The processing cost of reference‐set computation: guess patterns in acquisition’. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics.

—— (2006). Interface Strategies: Optimal and Costly Computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Reis, M. (1995). ‘Extractions from verb‐second clauses in German?’, in U. Lutz and J. Pafel (eds), On Extraction and Extraposition in German. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 45–88.

(p.373) —— (1997). ‘Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit‐Sätze’, in C. Dürscheid and K.‐J. Ramers (eds), Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 121–44.

Riemsdijk, H. van, and Williams, E. (1981). ‘NP‐structure’. The Linguistic Review 1: 171–217.

Rifaat, K. (1991). ‘The intonation of Arabic: an experimental study’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Alexandria.

Rizzi, L. (1986). ‘Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro’. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–57.

—— (1997). ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.

Roach, P. (1982). ‘On the distinction between “stress‐timed” and “syllable‐timed” languages’, in D. Crystal (ed.), Linguistic Controversies. London: Edward Arnold, 73–9.

Roberts, Ian (1998). ‘Have/Be raising, Move F, and procrastinate’. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 113–25.

—— (2005). Principles and Parameters in a VSO Language: A Case Study in Welsh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rochman, Lisa (2007a). ‘Motivating floated quantifiers’, in Ronald P. Leow, Héctor Campos, and Donna Lardiere (eds), GURT Proceedings. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

—— (2007b). ‘Phonological effects in floating quantifier placement’, in Peter Reich, Bill Sullivan, and Arle Lommel (eds), Proceedings of Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States Forum. Houston, TX: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.

—— (forthcoming). ‘Motivating floated quantifiers’, in Ronald P. Leow, Héctor Campos, and Donna Lardiere (eds), GURT Proceedings. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

—— (in prep.). ‘The role of focus structure and intonation in quantifier floating’. Ph.D. dissertation, Ben Gurion University of the Negev.

Ronat, M. (1982). ‘Logical Form and discourse islands’, Journal of Linguistic Research 2: 33–48.

Ross, John Robert (1970). ‘On declarative sentences’, in R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English Transformational Grammar (Waltham, MA: Blaisdell).

Rubach, Jerzy (1997). ‘Extrasyllabic consonants in Polish: Derivational Optimality Theory’, in Iggy Roca (ed.), Derivations and Constraints in Phonology. Oxford: Clarendon, 551–81.

—— (1981). Cyclic Phonology and Palatalization in Polish and English. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Universytetu Warszawskiego.

Rubin, E. J. (2003). ‘Determining pair‐merge’. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 660–8.

Rudnickaya, Elena (2000). ‘The derivation of Yes–No Li questions in Russian: Syntax and/or phonology?’, in Tracy H. King and Irina Sekerina (eds), Formal Approaches (p.374) to Slavic Linguistics: The Philadelphia Meeting, 1999. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Materials, 347–62.

Saffran, J., Aslin, R., and Newport, E. (1996). ‘Statistical learning by 8‐month‐old infants’. Science 274 (5294): 1926–8.

Saito, M. (1985). ‘Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

—— (1989). ‘Scrambling as semantically vacuous A'‐movement’, in M. Baltin and A. Kroch (eds), Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 182–200.

—— (2003). ‘A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains’. Lingua 113: 481–518.

—— (2005) ‘Further notes on the interpretation of scrambling chains’, in J. Sabel and M. Saito (eds), The Free Word Order Phenomenon: Its Syntactic Sources and Diversity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 335–76.

Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., and McQueen, J. M. (2003). ‘The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension’. Cognition 90: 51–89.

Samek‐Lodovici, Vieri (2005). ‘Prosody syntax interaction in the expression of focus’. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 687–755.

Sasse, H.‐J. (1987). ‘The thetic/categorical distinction revisited’. Linguistics 25: 511–80.

Scheer, Tobias (2008). ‘Spell out your sister!’ in Natasha Abner and Jason Bishop (eds), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville: Cascadilla, 379–87. May be downloaded at <http://www.unice.fr/dsl/tobias.htm>.

—— (2009). ‘Intermodular argumentation and the word‐spell‐out‐mystery’, in Kleanthes Grohmann (ed.), Explorations of Phase Theory: Interpretation at the Interfaces. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 23–66.

—— (forthcoming). How Morpho‐syntax Talks to Phonology. A Survey of Extra‐Phonological Information in Phonology since Trubetzkoy's Grenzsignale. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Schmerling, S. (1976). Aspects of English Sentence Stress. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Seidl, A. and Johnson, E. (2006). ‘Infant word segmentation revisited: edge alignment facilitates target extraction’. Developmental Science 9: 565–73.

Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

—— (1986). ‘On derived domains in sentence phonology’. Phonology Yearbook 3: 371–405.

—— (1995). ‘Sentence prosody: intonation, stress, and phrasing’, in John Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 550–69.

—— (2000). ‘The interaction of constraints on prosodic phrasing’, in M. Horne (ed.), Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 231–61.

(p.375) Selkirk, E. (2002). ‘Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: prosodic evidence from right node raising in English’, in B. Bel and I. Marlin (eds), Speech Prosody 2002: Proceedings of the First International Speech Prosody Conference. Aix‐en‐Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage, 643–6.

Shlonsky, U. (1997). Clause Structure and Word Order in Hebrew and Arabic. New York: Oxford University Press.

Shukla, M., Nespor, M., and Mehler, J. (2007). ‘An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech’. Cognitive Psychology 54 (1): 1–32.

—— —— —— (in prep.). ‘Grammar on a language map’.

Siegel, Dorothy (1974). ‘Topics in English morphology’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (2004). ‘Meaningful silence, meaningful sounds’. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 235–59.

Skopeteas, S., Fiedler, I., Hellmuth, S., Schwarz, A., Stoel, R., Fanselow, G., Féry, C., and Krifka, M. (2006). ‘Questionnaire on Information Structure (QUIS)’. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS): Working Papers of SFB632 University of Potsdam, 4.

Slobin, D. (1973). ‘Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar’, in C. A. Ferguson and D. Slobin (eds), Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 175–208.

Snedeker, J. and Yuan, S. (2008). ‘Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults)’. Journal of Memory & Language 58 (2): 574–608.

Soares, Carla (2003). ‘The C‐domain and the acquisition of European Portuguese: The case of wh‐questions’. Probus 15: 147–76.

Soderstrom, M., Seidl, A., Kemler Nelson, D. G., and Jusczyk, P. W. (2003). ‘The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: evidence from prelinguistic infants’. Journal of Memory and Language 4: 249–67.

Sosa, J. M. (1999). La entonación del español. Madrid: Cátedra.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Communication and Cognition. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

—— —— (2001), ‘Pragmatics, modularity and mind‐reading’. Mind and Language 17: 3–23.

Speyer, Augustin (2005). ‘Topicalization and the trochaic requirement’. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 10 (2), 243–56.

Sportiche, D. (1988). ‘A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure’. Linguisic Inquiry 19: 425–49.

Stechow, Arnim von and Uhmann, Susanne (1986). ‘Some remarks on focus projection’, in Werner Abraham and S. de Meij (eds), Topic, Focus, and Configurationality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 295–320.

Stepanov, A. (2001). ‘Late adjunction and minimalist phrase structure’. Syntax 4: 94–125.

Sternefeld, Wolfgang (2006). Syntax. Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.

(p.376) Stjepanović, Sandra (2007). ‘Free word order and copy theory of movement’, in Norbert Corver and Jairo Nunes (eds), The Copy Theory of Movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 219–48.

Suñer, M. (1982). Syntax and Semantics of Spanish Presentational Sentence‐Types. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Surányi, Balázs (2006). ‘Scrambling in Hungarian’. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 53: 393–432.

Swerts, M. (2007). ‘Contrast and accent in Dutch and Romanian’. Journal of Phonetics 35: 380–97.

—— Krahmer, E., and Avesani, C. (2002). ‘Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: a comparative analysis’. Journal of Phonetics 30 (4): 629–54.

Szabolcsi, Anna (1997). ‘Strategies for scope taking’, in Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking. Dordrecht: Reidel, 109–55.

Szendrői, K. (2001). ‘Focus and the syntax‐phonology interface’. Doctoral dissertation, University College London.

—— (2003). ‘A stress‐based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus’. The Linguistic Review 20 (1): 37–78.

—— (2004). ‘Acquisition evidence for an interface theory of focus’, in J. van Kampen and S. Baauw (eds), Proceedings of GALA 2003, Volumes 1–2. Utrecht: LOT, 457–68.

Szpyra, Jolanta (1989). The Phonology–Morphology Interface. London & New York: Routledge.

Tada, H. (1993). ‘A/A‐bar partition in derivation’. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

Thráinsson, H. (2001). ‘Object shift and scrambling’, in M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Malden: Blackwell, 148–202.

Trehub, S. (2003). ‘Toward a developmental psychology of music’. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 999: 402–13.

Truckenbrodt, Hubert (1995). ‘Phonological phrases: their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, MIT.

—— (1999). ‘On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases’. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (2): 219–55.

—— (2002). ‘Upstep and embedded register levels’. Phonology 19: 77–120.

—— (2004). ‘Final lowering in non‐final position’. Journal of Phonetics 32: 313–48.

—— (2005). ‘A short report on intonation phrase boundaries in German’, Linguistische Berichte 203: 273–96.

—— (2006a). ‘Phrasal stress’, in Keith Brown (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, Volume 9. 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevier, 572–9.

—— (2006b). ‘On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German’, Theoretical Linguistics 32 (3): 257–306.

—— (2007a). ‘Upstep of edge tones and of nuclear accents’, in Carlos Gussenhoven and Tomas Riad (eds), Tones and Tunes. Volume 2: Experimental Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody. Berlin: Mouton, 349–86.

—— (2007b). ‘The syntax phonology interface’, in Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 435–56.

(p.377) Uhmann, Susanne (1991). Fokusphonologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Uriagereka, Juan. (1999). ‘Multiple spell‐out’, in Samuel Epstein and Norbert Hornstein (eds), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 251–82.

Vallduví, E. (1991). ‘The role of plasticity in the association of focus and prominence’. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL) 7: 295–306.

—— (1992). The Informational Component. New York: Garland.

—— (1995). ‘Structural properties of information packaging in Catalan’, in K. Kiss, (ed.), Discourse Configurational Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vergnaud, J. R. and Zubizarreta, M. L. (2005). ‘The representation of focus and its implications: towards an alternative account of some “intervention effects” ’, in H. N. Corver, R. Huybregts, U. Kleinhenz, and J. Koster (eds), Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter: SSG 86.

Vikner, Sten (1995). Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wackernagel, Jacob (1892). ‘Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung’. Indogermanische Forschungen 1: 333–436.

Wagner, Michael (2005). ‘Prosody and recursion’. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Warren, P (1996). ‘Prosody and parsing: an introduction’. Language and Cognitive Processes 11 (1–2): 1–16.

Watson, J. C. E. (2002). The Phonology and Morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wechsler, Stephen (1991). ‘Verb second and illocutionary force’, in Katherine Leffel and Denis Bouchard (eds), Views on Phrase Structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 177–91.

WHO (World Health Organization) (1990). International Classification of Diseases (10th revision) Chapter 5: Mental and behavioural disorders (including disorders of psychological development). Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: WHO.

Wightman, C., Shattuck‐Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., and Price, P. (1992). ‘Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91 (3): 1707–17.

Williams, Edwin. (1997). ‘Blocking and anaphora’. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 577–617.

Winkler, Susanne and Göbbel, Edward (2002). ‘Review Article: Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998) Prosody, Focus, and Word Order, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 33. Massachusetts: MIT Press’. Linguistics 40 (6): 1185–243.

Woodrow, H. (1951). ‘Time perception’, in S. S. Stevens (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1224–36.

Xu, Y. (1999). ‘Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours’. Journal of Phonetics 27: 55–105.

Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

(p.378) Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

—— and Vergnaud, J.‐R. (2005). ‘Phrasal stress, focus, and syntax’, in M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds), The Syntax Companion. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Zwart, C. Jan‐Wouter (1997). Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Zwicky, A. (1977). On Clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.