Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Brownian MotionFluctuations, Dynamics, and Applications$

Robert M. Mazo

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199556441

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556441.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2016. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 10 December 2016

(p.258) Appendix A The Applicability of Stokes’ Law

(p.258) Appendix A The Applicability of Stokes’ Law

Source:
Brownian Motion
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

In the transcription of the 1911–1912 lectures of H.A. Lorentz (1921) on kinetic problems, there is a section in which Lorentz considers the validity of Stokes’ law for the description of Brownian motion. Since this appears to be very little known the present author’s translation of the relevant section is presented here.40

§7. Investigation of the validity of Stokes’ law for Brownian motion

One can now ask the question, what the resistance would be if the sphere had an arbitrarily changing motion. This is important for Brownian motion. One must, however, restrict oneself to low velocities, for in the calculation the terms u u/∂x and so forth41 were neglected. If one knew the velocity as a function of time for the duration of the experiment, then one could develop this in a Fourier series and apply the result (24).42 Through this, the resistance will then be known. However, this is not well adapted to a general discussion.

The formula of Stokes may not be applied to Brownian motion; the motion is much too fast for that. In (24), the term R(nρ/2µ)1/2 may be neglected with respect to 1 when the period, T, is large compared to πρ R2 /µ. Let πρ R2/µ = θ. Then, for very slow vibrations, where the period T is large with respect to θ, Stokes law may be applied, and this holds also for other motions in which the velocity changes but little in the time θ.

As an example of this, we may check whether Stokes’ law may be applied to the decay of the motion of a sphere as a consequence of the friction in the fluid. If m is the mass and v the velocity of the sphere, and we apply Stokes’ law, then

Appendix A The Applicability of Stokes’ Law

so that

Appendix A The Applicability of Stokes’ Law

v drops to 1/e of v 0 after the time m/6 πµR. If the density of the sphere is ρ 1then this time is (p.259)

Appendix A The Applicability of Stokes’ Law

If ρ and ρ 1 are comparable with each other, then we see that θ and this time τ are of the same order of magnitude. Stokes’ law may then not be applied to the decay of the motion.

For granules which undergo Brownian motion,θ becomes very small. If R= 5 × 10-5,µ = 18 × 10-5 then θ = π × 25 × 10-5/18 × 10-5 × ρ = 4 × 10-5 ρ approximately.

Certainly the motion of suspended particles will change very strongly in this time so that the details of the Brownian motion cannot be calculated with Stokes’ law. In many other cases, however, the motion will change little in the time θ and the law can be applied.43

Notes:

(40) This material is presented with the permission of Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands

(41) (Translator’s note) This refers to the nonlinear terms in the Navier–Stokes equations for the fluid.

(42) Equation (24) of the original reads ‘Thus the resistance is — 6 πRw bol(1+R√(ηρ/2µ)).’ R is the sphere radius, µ the viscosity, ρ the fluid density, η the vibrational frequency, and wbol = w 0exp(int).

(43) Since this translation was made, I have discovered a published English translation (Lorentz 1927), which is, however, not very accessible.