Reweaving the strands: welcoming diverse perspectives on the biology of music
This chapter presents Fitch's response to the commentaries in Chapters 10–13. The chapter completely agrees with Simon Kirby that we must be prepared to envisage different selective forces acting at different stages in the evolution of hominid communication (whether musical or linguistic), and his arguments about the relevance of the developmental stress hypothesis to the evolution of music are compelling. The chapter responds to Steven Mithen' request for several clarifications and elaborations. Iain Morley's commentary is considered rich in the breadth of evidence adduced, and this chapter strongly agrees with his general point that discussions of music evolution need to integrate dance more closely. However, it does not share Morely's conviction that dance and musical rhythmic behaviour necessarily make use of identical mechanisms. In response to Elizabeth Tolbert's critique, the chapter corrects a number of apparent misconceptions concerning the assumptions underlying his approach.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.