Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
How We Reason$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Philip Johnson-Laird

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199551330

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551330.001.0001

ContentsFRONT MATTER

Beliefs, Heresies, and Changes in Mind

Chapter:
(p. 332 ) Chapter 23 Beliefs, Heresies, and Changes in Mind
Source:
How We Reason
Author(s):

Philip N. Johnson-Laird

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551330.003.0023

This chapter concentrates on beliefs, heresies, and changes of mind. The detection of an inconsistency, the revision of beliefs, and the explanation of the inconsistency are three steps that offer the psychologist with an agenda for the study of changes of mind. Logic does not tell which is the offending belief. The chapter also addresses what should be done when an inconsistency is determined. Beliefs differ in how entrenched they are. The word ‘entrenchment’ is used to refer solely to the intellectual basis for a belief, such as its coherence with other beliefs, the existence of reasons that support it, its probability, and so on. In general, the entrenchment of a statement depends on its form, its meaning, and its relation to other knowledge. Moreover, the chapter considers how reasoning can affect beliefs.

Keywords:   beliefs, heresies, changes of mind, inconsistency, entrenchment, reasoning

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .