Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Implementation GameThe TRIPS Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Carolyn Deere

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199550616

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550616.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 January 2019

TRIPS Implementation in Francophone Africa

TRIPS Implementation in Francophone Africa

(p.240) 7 TRIPS Implementation in Francophone Africa
The Implementation Game

Carolyn Deere (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

This chapter explains why a group of the world's poorest countries adopted an array of TRIPS‐plus standards. It begins with a review of the colonial influence on IP regulation in francophone African countries and the origins of their distinctive regional approach to IP protection. It then introduces the region's common IP framework, the Bangui Agreement, and shows how the latest revisions exceed TRIPS requirements. The chapter traces the Bangui revision process through three phases, highlighting the limited capacity of national IP offices and the policymaking vacuum on IP issues in the region. It argues that the TRIPS‐plus outcome was a result of pressure from international donors (upon which countries relied for financing and technical expertise) and from their own regional organization, the African Intellectual Property Organization (over which they exercised little effective oversight). Importantly, this case highlights that in lieu of direct economic threats, capacity‐building was a decisive tool for international pressure. Moreover, for countries in a weak position in the international system, the compliance‐plus global political environment was a persuasive intervening factor.

Keywords:   francophone Africa, TRIPS flexibilities, economic pressure, national capacity, capacity‐building, OAPI, regional approach, Bangui Agreement, colonial, France

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .