Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Implementation GameThe TRIPS Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Carolyn Deere

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199550616

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550616.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 November 2017

Variation in TRIPS Implementation (1995–2007)

Variation in TRIPS Implementation (1995–2007)

Chapter:
(p.64) 3 Variation in TRIPS Implementation (1995–2007)
Source:
The Implementation Game
Author(s):

Carolyn Deere (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550616.003.0003

Drawing on a survey of evidence from 1995 to 2007, this chapter highlights a selection of the most striking elements of variation in how developing countries implemented TRIPS. It shows that countries took varying advantage of the legal safeguards and options in TRIPS, particularly in terms of the timing of legislative reforms and the use of key flexibilities in areas such as copyright, patents, and plant variety protection. The chapter proposes a typology of the overall degree to which countries took advantage of TRIPS flexibilities. It concludes that important aspects of variation sit at odds with the predictions of economists and their positions in international IP negotiations, thus making the case for political analysis of the reasons for variation. While some aspects of variation appear to reflect national economic circumstances and changing sectoral interests in developing countries, significant aspects do not. The divergence is particularly in the case of LDCs that adopted TRIPS‐plus approaches to implementation.

Keywords:   copyright, patents, trademark, plant variety protection, flexibilities, TRIPS, reform, implementation, TRIPS‐plus

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .