Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Kinds of ReasonsAn Essay in the Philosophy of Action$

Maria Alvarez

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199550005

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550005.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 20 June 2018

(p.201) References

(p.201) References

Source:
Kinds of Reasons
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Alvarez, M. (2007). ‘The Causalism/Anti‐Causalism Debate in the Theory of Action: What It Is and Why It Matters’, in A. Leist (ed.), Action in Context (Berlin and New York: de Gruyter), 103–23.

—— (2009). ‘Acting Intentionally and Acting for a Reason’, Inquiry, 52/3: 293–305.

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention (Oxford: Blackwell).

—— (1958). ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, Philosophy, 33: 1–19.

—— (1974). ‘Comment on Chisholm's “Practical Reason and the Logic of Requirement”’ in Körner (ed.) (1974: 19–28).

—— (1989). ‘Von Wright on Practical Inference’, in P. A. Schlipp and L. E. Hahn (eds.) (1989), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik Von Wright (La Salle, Ill.: Open Court), 377–404.

Aquinas, St T. (1960–73). Summa Theologiae, ed. T. Gilby (London: Blackfriars).

Aristotle (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. J. Barnes (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

Audi, R. (1993). Action, Intention, and Reason (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

—— (2001). The Architecture of Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Augustine, St (1943). Confessions, trans. J. F. Sheed (London: Sheed & Ward).

Austin, J. L. (1956). ‘Ifs and Cans’, repr. in Austin (1961), Philosophical Papers (Oxford: Clarendon).

Bacon, F. (1909–14). Essays, Civil and Moral (Harvard Classics (New York: P. F. Collier & Son)).

Ben‐Yami, H. (1997). ‘Against Characterizing Mental States as Propositional Attitudes’, Philosophical Quarterly, 47: 84–9.

Bittner, R. (2001). Doing Things for Reasons (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Broome, J. (2004). ‘Reasons’, in Wallace et al. (eds.) (2004: 28–55).

Chang, R. (2004). ‘Can Desires Provide Reasons for Action?’, in Wallace et al. (eds.) (2004: 56–90).

(p.202) Collins, A. (1987). The Nature of Mental Things (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press).

—— (1997). ‘On the Psychological Reality of Reasons’, Ratio, 10/2: 108–23.

Crane, T., and Mellor, D. (1990). ‘There Is No Question of Physicalism’, Mind, 99: 185–206.

Cullity, C., and Gaut, B. (eds.) (1997). Ethics and Practical Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Dancy, J. (2000). Practical Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Davidson, D. (1963). ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’, repr. in Davidson (1980: 3–19).

—— (1976). ‘Hempel on Explaining Action’, repr. in Davidson (1980: 261–76).

—— (1980). Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Frankfurt, H. (1988). The Importance of What We Care About (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Geach, P. (1976). Reason and Argument (Oxford: Blackwell).

Ginet, C. (1993). Actions (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Hacker, P. M. S. (1990). Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind: An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, vol. 3 (Oxford: Blackwell).

—— (2004). ‘The Conceptual Framework for the Investigation of Emotions’, International Review of Psychiatry, 16/3: 199–208.

Haldane, J. (1994). ‘Some Metaphysical Presuppositions of Agency’, Heythrop Journal, 35: 296–303.

Harcourt, E. (2004). ‘Instrumental Desires, Instrumental Rationality’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 78: 111–29.

Hempel, C. G. (1962). ‘Explanations in Science and History’, in R. G. Colodny (1962), Frontiers of Science and Philosophy (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press),

repr. in P. H Nidditch (1968), The Philosophy of Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Hempel, C. G., and Oppenheim, P. (1948). ‘Studies in the Logic of Explanation’, Philosophy of Science, 15: 135–75.

Heuer, U. (2004). ‘Reasons for Actions and Desires’, Philosophical Studies, 121: 43–63.

Hooker, B., and Streumer, B. (2004) ‘Procedural and Substantive Practical Rationality’, in Mele and Rawling (eds.) (2004: 55–74).

(p.203) Hursthouse, R. (1991). ‘Arational Actions’, Journal of Philosophy, 88/2: 57–68.

Hutto, D. (1999). ‘A Cause for Concern: Reasons, Causes and Explanations’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59: 381–401.

Hyman, J. (1999). ‘How Knowledge Works’, Philosophical Quarterly, 49: 433–51.

Jackson, F., Pettit, P., and Smith, M. (2004). Mind, Morality and Explanation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Kant, I. [1785] (1991). Moral Law: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. and trans. H. J. Paton (London: Routledge).

Kenny, A. J. P. (1963). Action, Emotion and Will (London: Routledge).

—— (1989). The Metaphysics of Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Körner, S. (ed.) (1974). Practical Reason (Oxford: Blackwell).

Korsgaard, C. (1996). The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

—— (1997). ‘The Normativity of Instrumental Reason’, in Cullity and Gaut (eds.) (1997: 215–54).

Lenman, J. (1996). ‘Belief, Desire and Motivation: An Essay in Quasi‐Hydraulics’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 33: 291–301.

Lewis, D. (1988). ‘Desire as Belief’, Mind, 97: 323–32.

Lowe, J. (2000). The Possibility of Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

McDowell, J. (1978). ‘Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 52: 13–29.

—— (1982). ‘Reasons and Actions’, Philosophical Investigations, 5: 301–5.

Mele, A. R. (2003). Motivation and Agency (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Mele, A. R., and Rawling, P. (eds.) (2004). The Oxford Handbook of Rationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Nagel, T. (1970). The Possibility of Altruism (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

O'Shaughnessy, B. (1980). The Will: A Dual‐Aspect Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Peters, R. S. (1958). The Concept of Motivation (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

Pettit, P., and Smith, M. (1990). ‘Backgrounding Desire’, Philosophical Review, 99: 565–92.

Platts, M. (1979). Ways of Meaning (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

(p.204) Pollard, B. (2006). ‘Explaining Actions with Habits’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 43: 57–68.

Price, H. H. (1969). ‘Self‐Verifying Beliefs’, in Price (1969), Belief (London and New York: Allen & Unwin), 349–75.

Quinn, W. (1993). ‘Putting Rationality in its Place’, in Quinn (1993), Morality and Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 228–55.

Raz, J. (1975). Practical Reason and Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

—— (1997). ‘When We Are Ourselves: The Active and the Passive’, reprinted in Raz (1999a: 5–21).

—— (1998). ‘Inconmensurability and Agency’, reprinted in Raz (1999a: 46–66).

—— (1999a). Engaging Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

—— (1999b). ‘Agency, Reason and the Good’, in Raz (1999a: 22–45).

Reid, T. [1788] (1969). Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

Rundle, B. (1997). Mind in Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Russell, B. (1919) ‘On Propositions: What They Are and How They Mean’, repr. in Russell (1956), Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950, ed. R. C. Marsh (London: George Allen & Unwin), 283–320.

Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind (London: Hutchinson).

Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

Schroeder, M. (2007). Slaves of the Passions (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Schueler, G. F. (1991). ‘Pro‐Attitudes and Direction of Fit’, Mind, 100: 277–82.

—— (1995). Desire: Its Role in Practical Reason and the Explanation of Action (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

—— (2003). Reasons and Purposes: Human Rationality and the Teleological Explanation of Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Sehon, S. (1994). ‘Teleology and the Nature of Mental States’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 31: 63–72.

—— (1997). ‘Deviant Causal Chains and the Irreducibility of Teleological Explanation’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 78: 195–213.

—— (2000). ‘An Argument against the Causal Theory of Action’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60: 67–85.

(p.205) Smith, M. (1987). ‘The Humean Theory of Motivation’, Mind, 96: 36–61.

—— (1994). The Moral Problem (Oxford: Blackwell).

—— (1998). ‘The Possibility of Philosophy of Action’, in D. Bransen and S. Cuypers (eds.) (1998), Human Action, Deliberation and Causation (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 17–41.

—— (2004). ‘Instrumental Desires, Instrumental Rationality’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 78: 93–109.

Steward, H. (1997). The Ontology of Mind: Events, Processes, and States (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Stocker, M. (1979). ‘Desiring the Bad: An Essay on Moral Psychology’, Journal of Philosophy, 76: 738–53.

—— (2004). ‘Raz on the Intelligibility of Bad Acts’, in Wallace et al. (eds.) (2004: 303–32).

Stout, R. (1996). Things that Happen Because They Should: A Teleological Approach to Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Stoutland, F. (1998), ‘Intentionalists and Davidson on Rational Explanation’, in G. Meggle (ed.) (1998), Actions, Norms, Values: Discussions with Georg Henrik von Wright (Berlin and New York: de Gruyter), 191–208.

—— (2001). ‘Responsive Action and the Belief‐Desire Model’, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 61: 83–106.

Strawson, P. F. (1950). ‘Truth’, repr. in Strawson (1971), Logico‐Linguistic Papers (London: Methuen), 147–64.

—— (1987). ‘Causation and Explanation’, repr. in Strawson (1992), Analysis and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 109–31.

Tanney, J. (1995). ‘Why Reasons May Not Be Causes’, Mind and Language, 10: 103–26.

Thompson, M. (2008). Life and Action. Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

Velleman, D. (1992). ‘The Guise of the Good’, repr. in Velleman (2000), The Possibility of Practical Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 99–122.

von Wright, G. H. (1963). The Varieties of Goodness (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

Wallace, R. J., Smith, M., Scheffler, S., and Pettit, P. (eds.) (2004). Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

(p.206) Watson, G. (1975). ‘Free Agency’, Journal of Philosophy, 72: 205–20.

White, A. (ed.) (1968). The Philosophy of Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Wilkins, B. T. (1963). ‘He Boasted from Vanity’, Analysis, 23/5: 110–12.

Williams, B. (1981). ‘Internal and External Reasons’, in Williams (1981), Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 101–13.

—— (1995). ‘Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame’, in Williams (1995), Making Sense of Humanity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 35–45.

Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Wilson, G. (1989). The Intentionality of Human Action (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell).

Zangwill, N. (1998). ‘Direction of Fit and Normative Functionalism’, Philosophical Studies, 91/2: 173–203.