Why Not Torture Terrorists?Moral, Practical, and Legal Aspects of the "Ticking Bomb" Justification for Torture - Oxford Scholarship Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Why Not Torture Terrorists?Moral, Practical, and Legal Aspects of the "Ticking Bomb" Justification for Torture
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Why Not Torture Terrorists?: Moral, Practical, and Legal Aspects of the "Ticking Bomb" Justification for Torture

Yuval Ginbar

Abstract

The book addresses a dilemma at the heart of the ‘War on Terror’: Is it ever justifiable to torture terrorists in order to save the lives of innocent civilians in a ‘ticking bomb situation’ (TBS)? The book first analyzes the ticking bomb dilemma as a pure moral one, facing the individual would-be torturer. A ‘never-say-never’ utilitarian position is pitted against a ‘minimal absolutist’ view that some acts are never justifiable, and that torture is one such act. It then looks at the issues that arise once a state has decided to sanction torture in extreme situations, including when, how, and w ... More

Keywords: torture, moral aspects, legal aspects, minimal absolutism, terrorism prevention, war on terror, ticking bomb situation, international law, human rights

Bibliographic Information

Print publication date: 2008 Print ISBN-13: 9780199540914
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009 DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199540914.001.0001

Authors

Affiliations are at time of print publication.

Yuval Ginbar, author
Legal Adviser, Amnesty International

Show Summary Details

subscribe or login to access all content.

Subscriber Login

Forgotten your password?

Contents

View:

PART I PRIVATE MORALITY: IS IT MORALLY JUSTIFIABLE FOR AN INDIVIDUAL TO TORTURE A TERRORIST IN ORDER TO SAVE MANY INNOCENT LIVES?

PART II PUBLIC, PRACTICAL MORALITY: IS IT MORALLY JUSTIFIABLE FOR A STATE TO TORTURE IN ORDER TO SAVE MANY INNOCENT LIVES?

PART III LEGALIZING TORTURE 1—FOUR MODELS

PART IV LEGALIZING TORTURE 2—THREE ISSUES

PART V CONCLUSIONS