Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Religious Freedom under the Personal Law System$

Farrah Ahmed

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780199458066

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: December 2015

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199458066.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 20 June 2018

(p.217) Bibliography

(p.217) Bibliography

Religious Freedom under the Personal Law System
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Adams, R.M. 1997. ‘Symbolic Value’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 21.

Agnes, F. 1995. ‘Hindu Men, Monogamy and Uniform Civil Code’, Economic and Political Weekly, 30: 3238.

———. 1996. ‘The Hidden Agenda Beneath the Rhetoric of Women’s Rights’, in M. Dutta, and others (eds), The Nation, the State, and Indian Identity. Calcutta: Samya.

———. 1999. Law and Gender Inequality: The Politics of Women’s Rights in India, Law in India Series. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

———. 2005. ‘Law and Gender Inequality: The Politics of Women’s Rights in India’, in Mala Khullar and Ihwa Taehakkyo (eds), Writing the Women’s Movement: A Reader. New Delhi: Zubaan.

———. 2009a. ‘Conjugality, Property, Morality and Maintenance’, Economic and Political Weekly, 44.

———. 2009b. ‘Shah Bano to Shabana Bano’, The Indian Express (15 December), available at www.indianexpress.com/news/shah-bano-to-shabana-bano/554314/0, accessed 18 July 2011.

———. 2011. Family Law Volume I: Family Laws and Constitutional Claims. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

(p.218) ———. 2011a. Law, Justice, and Gender: Family Law and Constitutional Provisions in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Agrawal, K.B. 2003. ‘India’, in W. Pintens (ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Laws (Family and Succession Law). The Hague: Kluwer.

Ahdar, R. and N. Aroney (eds). 2010. Shari’a in the West. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Ahdar, R. and I. Leigh. 2005. Religious Freedom and the Liberal State. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Ahuja, R. 2005. ‘Religion of the Bhils: A Sociological Analysis’, in Priyaram Chacko (ed.), Tribal Communities and Social Change. New Delhi: Sage.

al-Ahsan, A. 1986. ‘The Quranic Concept of Ummah’, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 7.

Ali, M. 2013. ‘Legislate Secular Civil Laws Applicable to all Communities, Demands Irfan Habib’, The Hindu (New Delhi, 28 September), available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/legislate-secular-civil-laws-applicable-to-all-communities-demands-irfan-habib/article5177625.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

———. 2014a. ‘Ruling does not Interfere with Muslim Personal Law’, The Hindu (23 February), available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/ruling-does-not-interfere-with-muslim-personal-law/article5717980.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

———. 2014b. ‘Muslims Object to Marriage Registration Proposal’, The Hindu (New Delhi, 22 April), available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/muslims-object-to-marriage-registration-proposal/article5935659.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

Ali, S.A. and E. Whitehouse. 1992. ‘The Reconstruction of the Constitution and the Case for Muslim Personal Law in Canada’, Journal of Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, 13.

All India Muslim Women Personal Law Board. ‘About Us’, available at muslimwomenpersonallaw.com/aboutus.html, accessed 19 November 2011.

All India Muslim Personal Law Board. ‘Introduction’, available at www.aimplboard.org/introduction.html, accessed 15 November 2011.

All India Muslim Personal Law Board. Available at www.aimplboard.org/introduction.html, accessed 8 October 2011.

Allport, G. 1966. ‘The Religious Context of Prejudice’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5.

Anand, U. 2014. ‘No Place for Fatwa in India; Cannot Be Used to Punish Innocent’, The Indian Express (8 July), available at http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/shariat-courts-not-legal-cant-issue-diktat-to-impinge-individuals-rights-sc-on-fatwa/99/, accessed 11 July 2014.

(p.219) Anderson, M.R. 1993. ‘Islamic Law and the Colonial Encounter in British India’, in D. Arnold and P. Robb (eds), Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.

———. 1996. Islamic Law and the Colonial Encounter in British India, Women Living Under Muslim Laws, available at www.iiav.nl/ezines/web/WomenLivingUnderMuslimLawsOP/1996/No7June.pdf, accessed 12 November 2011.

Anderson, S. 2008. ‘Coercion’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall edition), available at plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/coercion/, accessed 7 October 2011.

Appiah, K.A. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Armstrong, K. 2002. ‘The Curse of the Infidel’, The Guardian (20 June), available at www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/jun/20/religion.september11, accessed 15 November 2011.

———. 2004. The Spiral Staircase: My Climb Out Of Darkness. New York: Random House.

Arnold, D. and P. Robb (eds). 1993. Institutions and Ideologies: A SOAS South Asia Reader. Richmond: Curzon Press.

Atiyah, P.S. 1990. Essays on Contract. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Atkin, W.R. (ed.). 2007. The International Survey of Family Law 2007. Briston, England: Family Law of Jordon Publishing.

Atlas, N., S. Huber, and W. Trachte-Huber. 2000. Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Litigator’s Handbook. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.

Australian Federation of Islamic Councils Inc. 2011. Submission No. 81 to Australian Parliament Joint Standing Committee on Migration, Parliament of Australia, available at http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_committees?url=mig/multiculturalism/subs/sub81.pdf, accessed 16 June 2015.

Bader, V. 2009. ‘Legal Pluralism and Differentiated Morality’, in Ralph D. Grillo (ed.), Legal Practice and Cultural Diversity. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing.

Bahadur, Mahboob Ali Baig Sahib. 1948. Constituent Assembly of India Debates (23 November), available at, accessed 13 November 2011.

Baines, B. 2006. ‘Equality’s Nemesis?’, Journal of Law & Equality, 5.

Baird, R. 2001. ‘Gender Implications for a Uniform Civil Code’, in Gerald Larson (ed.), Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment. Delhi: Social Science Press.

Bajpai, R. 2002. ‘The Conceptual Vocabularies of Secularism and Minority Rights in India’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 7.

(p.220) Bakht, N. 2004. ‘Family Arbitration Using Sharia Law: Examining Ontario’s Arbitration Act and its Impact on Women’, Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 1.

———. 2006. ‘Were Muslim Barbarians Really Knocking on the Gates of Ontario? The Religious Arbitration Controversy—Another Perspective’ (40th anniversary edition). Ottawa Law Review.

Bano, S. 2007. ‘Islamic Family Arbitration, Justice and Human Rights in Britain’, Law, Social Justice & Global Development Journal, 1, available at www.go.warwick.ac.uk/elj/lgd/2007_1/bano, accessed 16 June 2015.

———. 2008. ‘In Pursuit of Religious and Legal Diversity: A Reply to the Archbishop of Canterbury and the “Sharia Debate” in Britain’, Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 8.

Barak-Erez, D. and R. Shapira. 1999. ‘The Delusion of Symmetric Rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19.

Barry, B. 2001. Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bavinck, M. 2001. ‘Caste Panchayats and the Regulation of Fisheries along Tamil Nadu’s Coromandel Coast’, Economic and Political Weekly, 36.

Baxi, P., S.M. Rai, and S.S. Ali. 2006. ‘Legacies of Common Law: “Crimes of Honour” in India and Pakistan’, Third World Quarterly, 27.

Baxi, U. 2000. ‘Postcolonial Legality’, in Henry Schwarz and Sangeeta Ray (eds), A Companion to Postcolonial Studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

BBC News (30 September 2010). ‘Q&A: The Ayodhya dispute’, available at www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11435240, accessed 14 November 2011.

Benhabib, S. 2002. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ben-Sasson, H.H., Moshe Perlman, and Dov Nov. 2007. ‘Apostasy’, in Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds), Encyclopedia Judaica (Volume 2). New York: Macmillan Reference.

Berger, B. 2007. ‘Law’s Religion: Rendering Culture’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 45(2).

Berger, M. 2006. ‘Sharia Law in Canada—Also Possible in the Netherlands?’, in P. van der Grinten and T. Heukels (eds), Crossing Borders: Essays in European and Private International Law, Nationality Law and Islamic Law in Honour of Frans van der Velden, pp. 173–84. Deventer: Kluwer.

Berofsky, B. 1995. Liberation from Self: A Theory of Personal Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2003. ‘Identification, the Self and Autonomy’, Social Philosophy & Policy

Bharatiya Janata Party, Vision Document 2004, available at www.bjp.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=136&Itemid=548, accessed 15 November 2011.

(p.221) Bhargava, R. 1994. ‘What is Secularism For’, Economic and Political Weekly, available at www.law.uvic.ca/demcon/victoria_colloquium/documents/WhatisSecularismforPreSeminarReading.pdf, accessed 20 November 2011.

———. (ed.). 1998. Secularism and its Critics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

———. 2010. The Promise of India’s Secular Democracy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Bhattacharjee, A.M. 1994a. Hindu Law and the Constitution (2nd edition). Calcutta: Eastern Law House.

———. 1994b. Muslim Law and the Constitution (2nd edition), pp. 6–8. Calcutta: Eastern Law House.

Blake, M. 2001. ‘Distributive Justice, State Coercion and Autonomy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30.

Bokser, B. 1984. The Origins of the Seder: The Passover Rite and Early Rabbinic Judaism. California: University of California Press.

Boyd, M. 2004. Dispute Resolution in Family Law: Protecting Choice, Promoting Inclusion. Ontario: Ministry of the Attorney-General.

Brown, W. 2006. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Burke, E. 1774. ‘Speech to the Electors of Bristol’ (3 November), available at press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch13s7.html, accessed 20 November 2011.

Buss, S. 2008. ‘Personal Autonomy’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall edition), available at plato.stanford.edu/entries/personal-autonomy/#2, accessed 31 July 2011.

Carroll, L. 1997. ‘Muslim Women and ‘Islamic Divorce’ in England’, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 17.

Caroll, R. and S. Prickett (eds). The Bible: Authorizes King James Version. (Matthew 18:20) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chakrabarty, D. 2007. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Charland, L. 2002. ‘Cynthia’s Dilemma: Consenting to Heroin Prescription’, The American Journal of Bioethics, 2.

Chatterjee, P. 1998. ‘Secularism and Tolerance’, in R. Bhargava (ed.), Secularism and its Critics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Choper, J. 1982. ‘Defining “Religion” in the First Amendment’, University of Illinois Law Review, 3.

Choudhury, C. 2007. ‘(Mis)Appropriated Liberty: Identity, Gender Justice and Muslim Personal Law Reform in India’, Georgetown University Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper, 969020: 15, available atssrn.com/abstract=969020, accessed 19 November 2011.

(p.222) Christman, J. and J. Anderson (eds). 2005. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Christman, J. 1988. ‘Constructing the Inner Citadel: Recent Work on the Concept of Autonomy’, Ethics, 99.

———. 1991. ‘Liberalism and Individual Positive Freedom’, Ethics, 101.

Church of South India Newsletter. Available at csinewsletter.com/newsrack12.asp, accessed 20 November 2011.

Cohen, A. 1985. Halacha and Contemporary Society. New York: Ktav Publishing.

Cohen, G.A. 2001. ‘Freedom and Money’, Revista Argentinade Teoría Jurídica.

Cohen, J. 1999. ‘Reflections on Habermas on Democracy’, Ratio Juris, 12.

Constituent Assembly Debates: Official Report. 1946–50. 12 volumes, VII. Delhi

Cohn, B. 1985. ‘The Command of Language and the Language of Command’, in R. Guha (ed.), Subaltern Studies IV: Writings on South Asian History and Society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Concerned Citizens Tribunal. 2002. Crimes against Humanity: Incidents and Evidence Volume I (Gujarat) available at www.sabrang.com/tribunal/volI/index.html, accessed 5 October 2011.

Constant, B. 1997. ‘The Liberty of the Ancients Compared to That of the Moderns’, in David Boaz (ed.), The Libertarian Reader. New York: The Free Press.

Constituent Assembly of India Debates. 1948 (4 November), available at www.indiankanoon.org/doc/843976/, accessed 16 June 2015.

Cooke, M. 2000. ‘Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy’, Political Studies, 48.

Crossman, B. and R. Kapur. 2001. Secularism’s Last Sigh? New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Cuniberti, G. 2008. ‘French Muslims Getting Divorced Back Home’, Conflict of Laws .net (12 February), available at conflictoflaws.net/2008/french-muslims-getting-divorce-back-home/, accessed 9 November 2011.

Cuypers, S.E. 2006. ‘Is Personal Autonomy the First Principle of Education?’, J Phil Education.

Darian-Smith, Eve and Peter Fitzpatrick. 1999. ‘Laws of the Postcolonial: An Insistent Introduction’, in Eve Darian-Smith and Peter Fitzpatrick (eds), Laws of the Postcolonial. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Darwall, S. 1977. ‘Two Kinds of Respect’, Ethics, 88.

———. 2006. ‘The Value of Autonomy and Autonomy of the Will’, Ethics.

De, R. 2009. ‘Mumtaz Bibi’s Broken Heart: The Many Lives of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act’, Indian Economic & Social History Review, 46.

———. 2013a. ‘Personal Laws: A Reality Check’, Frontline (19 August) available at http://www.frontline.in/cover-story/personal-laws-a-reality-check/article5037670.ece, accessed 11 July 2014.

(p.223) ———. 2013b. ‘Alternative For a’, Frontline (21 August) available at http://www.frontline.in/cover-story/alternative-fora/article5037680.ece, accessed 11 July 2014.

Derrett, D. 1961. ‘The Administration of Hindu Law by the British’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 4.

———. 1964. ‘Jewish Law in Southern Asia’, ICLQ, 13.

———. 1978. The Death of a Marriage Law. North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.

———. 1999. Religion, Law and the State in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Dhavan, R. 1987. ‘Religious Freedom in India’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 35.

———. 2003. ‘Codifying Personal Laws’, The Hindu (Chennai, 1 August) available at www.hinduonnet.com/2003/08/01/stories/2003080100521000.htm, accessed 14 November 2011.

———. 2009. ‘The Right to Disbelieve’, The Public Interest Legal Support and Research Centre (PILSARC) Blog, available at pilsarc.blogspot.com/2009/07/right-to-disbelieve.html, accessed 20 November 2011.

Dhavan, R. and Fali Nariman. 2000. ‘The Supreme Court and Group Life: Religious Freedom, Minority Groups, and Disadvantaged Communities’, in B.N. Kirpal (ed.), Supreme But Not Infallible: Essays in Honour of the Supreme Court of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Diwan, P. 2000. Muslim Law in Modern India (8th edition). Faridabad: Allahabad Law Agency.

Dostoevsky, F. 2007 [1880]. The Brothers Karamazov. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions.

Douglas, G., and others. 2011. Social Cohesion and Civil Law: Marriage, Divorce and Religious Courts (Cardiff University), available at www.religionandsociety.org.uk/uploads/docs/2011_07/1310467350_Social_Cohesion_and_Civil_Law_Full_Report.pdf, accessed 12 November 2011.

Dugger, C.W. 1999. ‘47 Suspected Militants in India Charged in Missionary’s Death’, The New York Times (New York, 25 January), available at www.nytimes.com/1999/01/25/world/47-suspected-militants-in-india-charged-in-missionary-s-death.html, accessed 5 October 2011.

Dworkin, G. 1982. ‘Is More Choice Better than Less?’, 7(1) Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 47–61.

———. 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dworkin, R. 1983. ‘Comment on Narveson: In Defense of Equality’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1.

(p.224) ———. 1996. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Eberhard, C. and N. Gupta. 2005. ‘Legal Pluralism in India: An Introduction’, Indian Socio-Legal Journal, 31.

Eekelaar, J. 2010. ‘From Multiculturalism to Cultural Voluntarism: A Family-Based Approach’, The Political Quarterly, 81.

Eisenberg, M.A. 1997. ‘The World of Contract and the World of Gift’, California Law Review, 85.

Elster, J. 1984. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality (Review edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Emon, A.E. 2008. ‘Islamic Law and the Canadian Mosaic: Politics, Jurisprudence, and Multicultural Accommodation’, Canadian Bar Review, 87.

Engineer, A.A. 1998. Dossier 20: Indian Islam and Reform Movements in Post-Independence India, Women Living Under Muslim Laws, available at www.wluml.org/node/311, accessed 10 October 2011.

Esbeck, C.H. 1990. ‘The Lemon Test: Should It Be Retained, Reformulated or Rejected?’, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 4.

Esposito, J.L. and N.J. DeLong-Bas. 2001. Women in Muslim Family Law. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.

Esposito, J.L. 2011. What Everyone Needs to Know about Islam (2nd edition). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Estin, A.L. 2004. ‘Embracing Tradition: Pluralism in American Family Law’, Maryland Law Review, 63.

Evans, C. 2001. Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

———. 2009. ‘Legal Aspects of the Protection of Religious Freedom in Australia’, pp. 19–21, available at www.hreoc.gov.au/frb/papers/Legal_%20Aspects.doc, accessed 23 December 2011.

Farrow, T.C.W. 2006. ‘Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate’, Constit Forum, 15.

Feinberg, J. 1974. ‘Non-Comparative Justice’, The Philosophical Review, 83.

———. 1989. ‘Autonomy’, in J. Christman (ed.), The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Forbes, G.H. 1996. Women in Modern India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fournier, P. 2005. Dossier 27: The Reception of Muslim Family Laws in Western Liberal States Women Living Under Muslim Laws, available at www.wluml.org/node/504, accessed 9 November 2011.

———. 2010. Muslim Marriage in Western Courts: Lost in Transplantation. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

(p.225) Frankfurt, H. 1971. ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’, Journal of Philosophy.

Freeman, G.C. 1983. ‘The Misguided Search for the Constitutional Definition of “Religion”’, Georgetown Law Journal, 71.

Fried, C. 1981. Contract As Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Fyzee, A.A.A. and T. Mahmood. 2005. Cases in the Muhammadan Law of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh (2nd edition). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

———. 2008. Outlines of Muhammadan Law (Law in India Series, 5th edition). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Gabriel, Y. 1998. ‘An Introduction to the Social Psychology of Insults in Organizations’, Human Relations, 51.

Galanter, M. and J. Krishnan. 2000. ‘Personal Law and Human Rights in India and Israel’, Israel Law Review, 9.

———. 2000a. ‘Personal Law and Human Rights in India and Israel’, Israel Law Review, 34.

———. 2000b. ‘Personal Law and Human Rights in India and Israel’, Israel Law Review, 35.

———. 2001. ‘Personal Law Systems and Religious Conflict: A Comparison of India and Israel’, in G. Larson (ed.), Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Galanter, M. 1968. ‘The Displacement of Traditional Law in Modern India’, Journal of Social Issues, 24.

———. 1998. ‘Hinduism, Secularism, and the Indian Judiciary’, in R. Bhargava (ed.), Secularism and its Critics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Galston, W. 1991. Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gani, H.A. 1978. Muslim Politics and National Integration. New Delhi: Sterling.

Gardner, J. 1998. ‘On the Ground of Her Sex(uality)’, Oxford Journal of Legal Issues, 18.

Gardner, P. 1988. ‘Religious Upbringing and the Liberal Ideal of Religious Autonomy’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 22.

Gargan, E.A. 1993. ‘Hindu Rage Against Muslims Transforming Indian Politics’, New York Times (New York, 17 September 1993), available at www.nytimes.com/1993/09/17/world/hindu-rage-against-muslims-transforming-indian-politics.html, accessed 15 November 2011.

Garvey, J.H. 1996a. ‘An Anti-Liberal Argument for Religious Freedom’, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues.

———. 1996b. What are Freedoms For? Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

(p.226) Giannella, D.A. 1967. ‘Religious Liberty, Nonestablishment, and Doctrinal Development: The Religious Liberty Guarantee’, Harvard Law Review, 80.

Gillon, R. 2000. ‘Refusal of Potentially Life-saving Blood Transfusions by Jehovah’s Witnesses: Should Doctors Explain that Not all JWs Think it’s Religiously Required?’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 26.

———. 2003. ‘Ethics Needs Principles—Four can Encompass the Rest—and Respect for Autonomy should be “First Among Equals”’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 29.

Goodin, R.E. 2006. ‘Liberal Multiculturalism: Protective and Polyglot’, Political Theory, 34.

Green, L. 1998. ‘Rights of Exit’, Legal Theory, 4.

———. 2010. ‘Two Worries about Respect for Persons’, Ethics, 210.

Greenawalt, K. 1984. ‘Religion as a Concept in Constitutional Law’, California Law Review, 72.

———. 1998. ‘Hands Off! Civil Court Involvement in Conflicts over Religious Property’, Colombia Law Review, 98.

———. 2006. Religion and the Constitution: Free Exercise and Fairness, Volume 1, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

———. 2008. Religion and the Constitution: Establishment and Fairness, Volume 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Grintz, Y. and R. Posner. 2007. ‘Jew’, in M. Berenbaum and F. Skolnik (ed.), Encyclopedia Judaica (Volume 2). New York: Macmillan Reference.

Guha, R. 2007. India After Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy. India Picador.

Gutmann, A. 1993a. ‘Democracy’, in R. Goodin and P. Pettit (eds), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

———. 1993b. ‘The Disharmony of Democracy’, in J.W. Chapman and I. Shapiro (eds), Democratic Community. New York: New York University Press.

Hallaq, W.B. 2005. The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hansen, T. 1999. The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Harries, P. 1988. ‘The Roots of Ethnicity: Discourse and the Politics of Language Construction’, African Affairs, 87.

Harrison, P. 1990. ‘Religion’ and the Religions in the English Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hart, H.L.A. 1994. The Concept of Law (2nd edition). Oxford: Clarendon.

Hasan, M. 2001. Legacy of a Divided Nation: India’s Muslims since Independence. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

(p.227) Hasan, Z. 1989. ‘Minority Identity, Muslim Women Bill Campaign and the Political Process’, Economic and Political Weekly, 24.

———. 1994. ‘Introduction: Contextualising Gender and Identity in Contemporary India’, in Z. Hasan (ed.), Forging Identities: Gender, Communities and the State in India. Boulder, Colo: Westview.

———. 1998. ‘Gender Politics, Legal Reform and the Muslim Community in India’, in P. Jeffery and A. Basu, Appropriating Gender: Women’s Agency, the State, and Politicized Religion in South Asia. New York: Routledge.

———. 2005. ‘Governance and Reform of Personal Laws in India’, in I. Jaising (ed.), Men’s Laws, Women’s Lives: A Constitutional Perspective on Religion, Common Law and Culture in South India. New Delhi: Women Unlimited.

Hasan, Zoya. 2005a. ‘Minority Identity, State Policy and the Political Process’, in M. Khullar (ed.), Writing the Women’s Movement: A Reader. New Delhi: Zubaan.

Hauerwas, S. 2010. ‘America’s God is Dying’, ABC Religion and Ethics (20 July), available at www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2010/07/20/2947368.htm, accessed 14 November 2011.

Helfand, M.A. 2011. ‘Religious Arbitration and the New Multiculturalism: Negotiating Conflicting Legal Orders’, NYUL Rev (forthcoming), 86 New York University Law Review, 1231, available at works.bepress.com/michael_helfand/3/, accessed 29 September 2011.

Hidayatullah, M. and A. Hidayatullah. (eds). 1977. Mahomedan Law (18th edition). Bombay: Tripathi.

Hirschman, A.O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain. 2008. ‘Islam demands the Political Unity of this Ummah’ (16 August), available at www.hizb-ut-tahrir.org/PDF/EN/en_w_pdf/160808UK.pdf, accessed 20 November 2011.

Human Rights Watch. 1999. Politics by Other Means: Attacks against Christians in India (October), available at www.hrw.org/reports/1999/indiachr/christians8-04.htm, accessed 13 November 2011.

Hurka, T. 1987. ‘Why Value Autonomy?’, Social Theory & Practice, 13.

Hussain, A. 1935. Muslim Law as Administered in British India. Calcutta: Das Publishing.

Hyun, I. 2001. ‘Authentic Values and Individual Autonomy’, Journal of Value Inquiry, 35.

Ilangovan, R. and S. Dutta. 2013. ‘Taking on Patriarchy’, Frontline (21 August), available at http://www.frontline.in/cover-story/taking-on-patriarchy/article5037878.ece, accessed 11 July 2014.

Ilbert, C. 1907. The Government of India: Being a Digest of the Statute Law Relating Thereto (2nd edition). Oxford: Clarendon.

(p.228) Indian Express (New Delhi, 31 August 2011). ‘Centre Says No to Separate Sikh Marriage Act, SAD to Meet PM’, available at www.indianexpress.com/news/centre-says-no-to-separate-sikh-marriage-act-sad-to-meet-pm/839594, accessed 6 October 2011.

Jaising, I. 2005. ‘Gender Justice: a Constitutional Perspective’, in I. Jaising (ed), Men’s Laws, Women’s Lives: A Constitutional Perspective on Religion, Common Law and Culture in South India, pp. 2–3. New Delhi: Women Unlimited.

Jenkins, L.D. 2004. ‘Legal Limits On Religious Conversion in India’, Law & Contemporary Problems, 71.

Jones, J.T., P.W. Pelham, and M.C. Mirenberg. 2002. ‘Name Letter Preferences are Not Merely Mere Exposure: Implicit Egotism as Self-Regulation’, Ohio St U, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38.

Kadushin, J. 1921. Jewish Code of Jurisprudence. Boston: Talmud Society.

Kahoe, R.D. and M.J. Meadow. 1981. ‘A Developmental Perspective on Religious Orientation Dimensions’, Journal of Religion & Health, 20.

Kapoor, C. 2007. ‘Act of Vigilantism’, The Indian Express (18 April), available at www.indianexpress.com/news/act-of-vigilantism/28598/, accessed 14 November 2011.

Kapur, R. and B. Crossman. 1996. Subversive Sites: Feminist Engagements with Law in India. New Delhi: Sage.

Kapur, R. 2002. ‘The Tragedy of Victimization Rhetoric: Resurrecting the “Native” Subject in International/Post-Colonial Feminist Legal Politics’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 15.

Karayanni, M. 2006. ‘The Separate Nature of the Religious Accommodations for the Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel’, Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 5.

Karve, I. 1988. ‘A Town without a Temple’, in E. Zelliot and M. Berntsen (eds), The Experience of Hinduism: Essays on Religion in Maharashtra. New York: SUNY Press.

Karvelas, P. 2011. ‘Imam Wants Sharia Law Here, but A-G Says No Way’, The Australian (18 May), available at www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/imam-wants-sharia-law-here-but-a-g-says-no-way/story-fn59niix-1226057823890, accessed 10 October 2011.

Kaviraj, S. 2009. ‘On Thick and Thin Religion: Some Critical Reflections on Secularisation Theory’ (April). Columbia University: Department of Middle East and Asian Languages and Cultures Colloquium.

Kent, J. 2006. ‘Malaysia “apartheid” row deepens’, BBC News (London, 11 March), available at news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4795808.stm, accessed 13 November 2011.

Khaitan, T. 2010. ‘Adoption Rights of non-Hindus and Constitutionality of Personal Laws’, Law and Other Things (28 February), available at (p.229) lawandotherthings.blogspot.com/2010/02/adoption-rights-of-non-hindus.html, accessed 24 July 2010.

———. 2010a. ‘An Autonomy-Based Foundation for Legal Protection against Discrimination’. University of Oxford: DPhil book.

Kimel, D. 2003. From Promise to Contract: Towards a Liberal Theory of Contract. Oxford: Hart.

Kishwar, M. 1994. ‘Codified Hindu Law: Myth and Reality’, Economic and Political Weekly, 29.

Koppelman, A. 2006. ‘Is It Fair to Give Religion Special Treatment’, University of Illinois Law Review, 571.

———. 2008. ‘Religious Establishment and Autonomy’, Constitutional Commentary, 25.

Korteweg, A.C. 2008. ‘The Sharia Debate in Ontario: Gender, Islam, and Representations of Muslim Women’s Agency’, Gender & Society, 22.

Krayem, G. 2014. Islamic Family Law in Australia: To Recognise or Not To Recognise. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

Kukathas, C. 2003. The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Kusum. 2011. Family Law Lectures: Family Law I (3rd edition). LexisNexis.

Kymlicka, W. 1989. Liberalism, Community, and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

———. 1992. ‘Two Models of Pluralism and Tolerance’, Analyse & Kritik, 14.

Larsen, E. and L. Rainie. 2001. ‘CyberFaith: How Americans Pursue Religion Online’ (December), available at www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2001/PIP_CyberFaith_Report.pdf.pdf, accessed 4 October 2011.

Larson, G. 2001. ‘Introduction the Secular State in a Religious Society’, in G. Larson (ed.), Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment. Delhi: Social Science Press.

Lavin, M. 1986. ‘Ulysses Contracts’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 3(1).

Law Commission of India. 2008. Laws on Registration of Marriage and Divorce – A Proposal for Consolidation and Reform: Report No. 211 (October), available at lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/report211.pdf, accessed 6 October 2011.

Laycock, D. 1996. ‘Religious Liberty as Liberty’, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues.

Levey, G. 1997. ‘Equality, Autonomy, and Cultural Rights’, Political Theory, 25(2).

Levy, J. 2000. ‘Three Modes of Incorporating Indigenous Law’, in W. Kymlicka and W.J. Norman, Citizenship in Diverse Societies. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

(p.230) Lijphart, A. 1996. ‘The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation’, The American Political Science Review, 90.

Lingat, R. 1973. The Classical Law of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Locke, J. 1689. A Letter Concerning Toleration. London: William Popple, tr.

Loewy, A.H. 1985. ‘Rethinking Government Neutrality Towards Religion Under the Establishment Clause: the Untapped Potential of Justice O’Connor’s Insight’, North Carolina Law Review, 64.

Lok Sabha Secretariat. 1999. Constituent Assembly Debates Book No 2. 781.

MacKinnon, C.A. 2006. ‘Sex Equality under the Constitution of India: Problems, Prospects, and “Personal Laws”’, 4, 181, 196. International Journal of Constitutional Law, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Madan, T.N. 2010. Modern Myths, Locked Minds: Secularism and Fundamentalism in India (2nd edition). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Mahajan, G. 1998. Identities and Rights: Aspects of Liberal Democracy in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press

———. 2004. ‘Can Intra-Group Equality Co-Exist With Cultural Diversity? Re-Examining Multicultural Frameworks of Accommodation’, in A.I. Eisenberg and J. Spinner-Halev (eds), Minorities Within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2005. ‘Indian Exceptionalism or Indian Model: Negotiating Cultural Diversity and Minority Rights in a Democratic Nation-State’, in W. Kymlicka and B. He (eds), Multiculturalism in Asia. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Mahmood, S. 2014. ‘Misunderstanding a Good Judgement’, The Hindu (19 July), available at http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/misunderstanding-a-good-judgment/article6225968.ece, accessed 16 June 2015.

Mahmood, T. 1980. The Muslim Law of India. Allahabad: Law Book Co.

———. 1986. Personal Laws in Crisis (1st edition Metropolitan), PB Gajendragadkar Endowment Lectures. New Delhi: Metropolitan.

———. 1987. Personal Law in Islamic Countries: History, Text, and Comparative Analysis, Academy of Law and Religion, available at www.getcited.org/pub/102682745, accessed 10 October 2011.

———. 2007. ‘Personal Law, Social Myths’, The Indian Express (7 September), available at www.indianexpress.com/news/personal-law-social-myths/513767/, accessed 19 November 2011.

Malhotra, A. and R. Malhotra. 2007. ‘Hindu Law and the Uniform Civil Code: The Indian Experience’, in W.R. Atkin (ed.), The International Survey of Family Law 2007. Bristol: Family Law of Jordon Publishing.

———. 2010. ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in Indian Family Law—Realities, Practicalities and Necessities’, Journal of the International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 3.

(p.231) Margalit, A. and J. Raz. 1990. ‘National Self-Determination’, The Journal of Philosophy, 87.

Mason, E. 2011. ‘Value Pluralism’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall edition), available at plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/value-pluralism/, accessed 20 November 2011.

Masoodi, A. 2014. ‘The Religious Contours of Adoption in India’ Live Mint (20 February), available at http://www.livemint.com/Politics/3mOuc3wMjpjDG2qx60B8PK/The-religious-contours-of-adoption-in-India.html, accessed 16 June 2015.

May, T. 1994. ‘The Concept of Autonomy’, American Philosophical Quarterly.

McCabe, D. 2001. ‘Joseph Raz and the Contextual Argument for Liberal Perfectionism’, Ethics, 111.

McLaughlin, T.H. 1990. ‘Peter Gardner on Religious Upbringing and the Liberal Ideal of Religious Autonomy’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 24.

McVeigh, K. and A. Hill. 2011. ‘Bill Limiting Sharia Law is Motivated by “Concern for Muslim Women”’, The Guardian (London, 8 June), available at www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/jun/08/sharia-bill-lords-muslim-women, accessed 9 November 2011.

Mehta, P.B. 2003a. ‘Obscuring the Real Issues’ The Hindu (30 July), available at www.hindu.com/2003/07/30/stories/2003073001431000.htm, accessed 15 November 2011.

———. 2003b. ‘Passion and Constraint’, Seminar, 521, available at www.india-seminar.com/2003/521/521%20pratap%20bhanu%20mehta.htm, accessed 20 November 2011.

———. 2008. ‘On the Possibility of Religious Pluralism’, in Thomas Banchoff (ed.), Religious Pluralism, Globalization, and World Politics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Mele, A.R. 1995. Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Menon, M. 2007. ‘Uniform Civil Code and Gender Justice’, The Hindu (29 May), available at www.hindu.com/br/2007/05/29/stories/2007052900571500.htm, accessed 5 January 2012.

Menski, W. 2001. ‘Postmodern Hindu Law’, SOAS Law Department Occasional Papers, available at www.casas.org.uk/papers/pdfpapers/pomolaw.pdf, accessed 19 November 2011.

———. 2001a. Modern Indian Family Law. Routledge.

———. 2003. Hindu Law: Beyond Tradition and Modernity. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

———. 2006. Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(p.232) ———. 2008. ‘The Uniform Civil Code Debate in Indian Law: New Developments and Changing Agenda’, 9, German Law Journal, 211.

———. 2008a. Hindu Law. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Merry, Sally Engle. 1988. ‘Legal Pluralism’, Law & Society Review, 22.

———. 2008. ‘Colonial and Polstcolonial Law’, in A. Sarat (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Meyers, D.T. 1987. ‘Personal Autonomy and the Paradox of Feminine Socialization’, The Journal of Philosophy, 84.

Mielziner, M. 2008[1884]. The Jewish Law of Marriage and Divorce in Ancient and Modern Times, and Its Relation to the Law of the State. SI: Read Books.

———. 1901. Jewish Law of Marriage and Divorce in Ancient and Modern Times. New York: Bloch Publishing Company.

Mill, J.S. 2005[1859]. On Liberty. New York: Cosimo.

———. 1859. On Liberty (2nd edition). London: JW Parker.

Miller, D. (ed.). 2006. The Liberty Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

Milli Gazette. Available at www.milligazette.com, accessed 20 November 2011.

Minault, G. 1999. The Khilafat Movement: Religious Symbolism and Political Mobilization in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Ministry of Education and Social Welfare. 1974. Towards Equality: Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in India. New Delhi: Government of India.

Moberg, D.O. 1987. ‘Holy Masquerade: Hypocrisy in Religion’, Review of Religious Research, 29.

Modi, A. 2001. ‘Tailoring History’, The Hindu (21 October), available at www.hindu.com/thehindu/2001/10/21/stories/0521134h.htm, accessed 5 October 2011.

———. 2003. ‘The Shah Bano Legacy’, The Hindu (Chennai, 10 August), available at hindu.com/2003/08/10/stories/2003081000221500.htm, accessed 15 November 2011.

Moore, Erin. 1998. Religion, Law and Resistance in India. University of Arizona Press, 45–7.

Moosa, Z. 2010. ‘Balancing Women’s Rights with Freedom of Religion: The Case against Parallel Legal Systems for Muslim Women in the UK’, in Minority Rights Group International, State of the World’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2010: Events of 2009. London : Minority Rights Group International.

Mulla, D.F. and S.A. Desai. 2000. Principles of Hindu Law (17th edition). New Delhi: Butterworths India.

Mullally, S. 2004. ‘Feminism and Multicultural Dilemmas in India: Revisiting the Shah Bano Case’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24, 671.

(p.233) Mustafa, F. 2014. ‘The Importance of Piecemeal Reforms’, The Hindu (2 July), available at http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/the-importance-of-piecemeal-reforms/article6167344.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

Nandy, A. 1997. ‘The Twilight of Certitudes: Secularism, Hindu Nationalism, and other Masks of Deculturation’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 22.

———. 2004. ‘A Billion Gandhis’, Outlook (New Delhi, 21 June), available at www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?224252, accessed 4 October 2011.

National Commission for Minorities, Government of India. 2008. ‘Research Project Report on All India Birth Rate of Parsi—Zoroastrians from 2001 till 15th August, 2007’, available at ncm.nic.in/pdf/Parsi%20%20Report.pdf, accessed 20 November 2011.

National Human Rights Commission. 2002. Proceedings (31 May), available atnhrc.nic.in/guj_finalorder.htm, accessed 16 November 2011.

Nedelsky, J. 1989. ‘Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts, and Possibilities’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 1.

Newbigin, E. 2009. ‘The Codification of Personal Law and Secular Citizenship: Revisiting the History of Law Reform in Late Colonial India’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 46.

Nickel, J.W. 1998. ‘Review: Why Basic Liberties Are Bilateral’, Law & Philosophy, 17, 627.

Noorani, A.G. 1998–9. ‘RSS and Christians’, Frontline, 15(26), available at www.hindu.com/fline/fl1526/15261230.htm, accessed 4 October 2011.

———. 2014. ‘Impossible Agenda’, Frontline (11 June), available at http://www.frontline.in/the-nation/impossible-agenda/article6097233.ece, accessed 11 July 2014.

Norton, J. 2011. Law and Religious Organizations: Exceptions, Non-Interference and Justification. University of Oxford: DPhil book.

Note. 1977. ‘Towards a Constitutional Definition of Religion’, Harvard Law Review, 91(1056).

Nozick, R. 1969. ‘Coercion’, in S. Morgenbesser, P. Suppes, and M. White (eds), Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel. New York: St Martin’s Press.

Nussbaum, M. 2004. ‘India Implementing Sex Equality Through Law’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 2.

———. 2008. ‘Beyond Toleration to Equal Respect’, Seminar, 581, available at www.india-seminar.com/2008/581/581_martha_nussbaum.htm, accessed 6 October 2011.

———. 2008a. Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America’s Tradition of Religious Equality. New York: Basic Books.

———. 2009. ‘Personal Laws and Equality: The Case of India’, Comparative Constitutional Design conference, University of Chicago Law School (17 (p.234) October), available at www.law.uchicago.edu/audio/nussbaum101709, accessed 13 November 2011.

Office of the Registrar-General & Census Commissioner of India. 2001. Census Data: Religious Composition, available at www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/India_at_glance/religion.aspx, accessed 6 October 2011.

Omvedt, G. 2006. Dalit Visions: The Anti-Caste Movement and the Construction of an Indian Identity. New Delhi: Orient Longman.

Oshana, M. 2003. ‘How Much Should We Value Autonomy?’ Social Philosophy and Policy, 20(99).

Parashar, A. 1982. ‘Polygamous Marriage in Conflict of Laws’, Islam and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2, 187.

———. 1992. Women and Family Law Reform in India: Uniform Civil Code and Gender Equality. New Delhi: Sage.

Pathak, V. 2013. ‘History Books Might Change Again: BJP’, Hindustan Times (New Delhi, 23 June), available at http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/history-books-might-change-again-bjp/article1-1081239.aspx, accessed 16 July 2014.

Peace Arena. 2008. ‘Oklahoma Candles for 4000: A Virtual Vigil for Peace’ (24 March), available at peacearena.org/4000candles, accessed 4 October 2011.

Phillips, L.C.J. 2008. ‘Equality before the Law’ (East London Muslim Centre, 3 July), available at www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Speeches/lcj_equality_before_the_law_030708.pdf, accessed 9 October 2011.

Philpott, D. 1995. ‘In Defense of Self-Determination’, Ethics, 105.

Pollack, D., M. Bleich, C.J. Reid, and M. Fadel. 2004. ‘Classical Religious Perspectives of Adoption Law’, Notre Dame Law Review, 79.

Post, R. 2009. ‘Hate Speech’, in I. Hare and J. Weinstein, Extreme Speech and Democracy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Poulter, S. 1990. ‘The Claim to a Separate Islamic System of Personal Law for British Muslims’, in C. Mallat and J. Connors (eds), Islamic Family Law. London: Graham and Trotman.

Press Information Bureau, Government of India. 2007. ‘Status of Jain Community’ (7 May). Available at pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=27576, accessed 20 November 2011

Prime Minister’s High Level Committee. 2006. ‘Social, Economic and Educational Status of the Muslim Community of India’, available at minorityaffairs.gov.in/sachar, accessed 20 November 2011.

Ptolke, D. 1997. ‘Representation is Democracy’, Constellations, 4.

Punwani, J. 2014. ‘No Second Wife, Please’, The Hindu (29 June), available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-sundaymagazine/no-second-wife-please/article6158587.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

(p.235) Qureshi, M.N. 1999. Pan-Islam in British Indian Politics: A Study of the Khilafat Movement, 1918–1924. Leiden: Brill.

Radden, J. 1994. ‘Second Thoughts: Revoking Decisions Over One’s Own Future’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54.

Rajalakshmi, T.K. 2013. ‘For Equal Laws’, Frontline (21 August), available at http://www.frontline.in/cover-story/for-equal-laws/article5037793.ece, accessed 11 July 2014.

———. 2013a. ‘In the Name of Honour, Again’, Frontline (16 October), available at http://www.frontline.in/social-issues/in-the-name-of-honour-again/article5229025.ece, accessed 11 July 2014.

Rajan, R.S. 2000. ‘Women between Community and State: Some Implications of the Uniform Civil Code Debates in India’, Social Text, 18.

———. 2003. The Scandal of the State: Women, Law, and Citizenship in Postcolonial India, pp. 150–1. Durhum (NC): Duke University Press.

Ramaseshan, G. 2013. ‘Courting Marriage’, The Hindu (23 June), available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-miscellaneous/tp-others/courting-marriage/article4842100.ece, accessed 17 July 2014.

Rashid, A. 2013. ‘City’s First Sharia Court for Women Gets Off to a Modest Start’, The Indian Express (3 October), available at http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/citys-first-sharia-court-for-women-gets-off-to-a-modest-start/, accessed 11 July 2014.

Rautenbach, C. 2006. ‘Phenomenon of Personal Laws in India: Some Lessons for South Africa’, Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 39.

Rawls, J. 1972. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Raz, J. 1982. ‘Liberalism, Autonomy and the Politics of Neutral Concern’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy.

———. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

———. 1990. Authority. New York: New York University Press.

———. 1994. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

———. 2000. Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Réaume, D. 1995. ‘Justice Between Cultures: Autonomy and the Protection of Cultural Affiliation’, University of British Columbia Law Review, 29.

Redding, J.A. 2006. ‘Human Rights and Homo-Sectuals: The International Politics of Sexuality, Religion, and Law’, Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, 4.

———. 2007. ‘Slicing the American Pie: Federalism and Personal Law’, Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series Paper 10. lsr.nellco.org/yale/fss/papers/10, last accessed 15 November 2011.

(p.236) ———. 2010. ‘Institutional v Liberal Contexts for Contemporary Non-State, Muslim Civil Dispute Resolution Systems’, Journal of Islamic State Practices in International Law, 6(1).

Reddy, V. and V. Nagaraj. 2002. ‘Arbitrability: The Indian Perspective’, Journal of International Arbitration, 19.

Rehman, J. 2007. ‘The Sharia, Islamic Family Laws and International Human Rights Law: Examining the Theory and Practice of Polygamy and Talaq’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 21.

Resnick, L. 2007. ‘Family Dispute Arbitration and Sharia Law’, BC Civil Liberties Association. Available at www.bccla.org/othercontent/07Sharialaw.pdf, accessed 9 October 2011.

Richards, D. 1981. ‘Rights and Autonomy’, Ethics, 92.

Rohe, M. 2011. ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in Europe under the Auspices of Religious Norms’, Religare Working Paper No. 6 (January), available at www.religareproject.eu/content/alternative-dispute-resolution-europe-under-auspices-religious-norms, accessed 9 October 2011.

Roland, J.G. 1998. The Jewish Communities of India: Identities in a Colonial Era (2nd edition). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Rostain, T. 1987. ‘Permissible Accommodations of Religion: Reconsidering the New York Get Statute’, Yale Law Journal, 96.

Roy, A. 2005. ‘Postcolonial Theory and Law: A Critical Introduction’, Adelaide Law Review, 29.

Roy, N.S. 2012. ‘Muslim Women in India Seek Gender Equality in Marriage’, The New York Times (24 April), available at http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/25/world/asia/25iht-letter25.html, accessed 13 July 2014.

Rudolph, L. and S.H. Rudolph. 1967. The Modernity of Tradition: Political Development in India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rudolph, S.H. and L.I. Rudolph. 2001. ‘Living with Difference in India: Legal Pluralism and Legal Universalism in Historical Context’, in G.J. Larson (ed.), Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment. Delhi: Social Science Press.

Ryder, B. 2008. ‘The Canadian Conception of Equal Religious Citizenship’, in R. Moon (ed.), Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

Sandel, M. 1989. ‘Religious Liberty—Freedom of Conscience or Freedom of Choice’, Utah Law Review.

Sandel, M.J. 1996. Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Sangari, K. 1999. ‘Gender Lines: Personal Laws, Uniform Laws, Conversion’, Social Scientist, 27(5/6).

(p.237) Sapir, G. and D. Statman. 2005. ‘Why Freedom of Religion Does Not Include Freedom from Religion’, Law and Philosophy, 24.

Sarkar, T. 2000. Hindu Wife, Hindu Nation. New Delhi: Permanent Black.

Saxena, P. 2007. Family Law Lectures: Family Law II. New Delhi: LexisNexis.

Seervai, H.M. 1991. Constitutional Law of India: A Critical Commentary (4th edition). Bombay: Tripathi.

Shanoor, S. 2014. ‘Why Muslims Still Can’t Adopt in India’ The Wall Street Journal (19 March), available at http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2014/03/19/why-muslims-still-cant-adopt-in-india/, accessed 19 July 2014.

Sen, R. 2010. ‘The Indian Supreme Court and the Quest for a “Rational” Hinduism’, South Asian History and Culture, 1.

———. 2010a. Articles of Faith: Religion, Secularism, and the Indian Supreme Court. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Sengupta, S. 2008. ‘Hindu Threat to Christians: Convert or Flee’, The New York Times (New York, 12 October), available at www.nytimes.com/2008/10/13/world/asia/13india.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1, accessed 5 October 2011.

Shachar, A. 1998. ‘Group Identity and Women’s Rights in Family Law: The Perils of Multicultural Accommodation’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 6.

———. 2001. Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shah, P.A. 2008. ‘Globalisation and the Challenge of Asian Legal Transplants in Europe’, Belgrade Law Review, 3.

Shah, P.A. 2003a. ‘Attitudes to Polygamy in English Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60.

——— 2003b. ‘Attitudes to Polygamy in English Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52(2): 369–400.

Shaheed, F. 1994. ‘Controlled or Autonomous: Identity and the Experience of the Network, Women Living under Muslim Laws’, Signs, 19.

Shah-Kazemi, S. 2001. Untying the Knot: Muslim Women, Divorce and the Shariah. London: Nuffield Foundation.

Sharafi, M.J. 2006. ‘Bella’s Case: Parsi Identity and the Law in Colonial Rangoon, Bombay and London, 1887–1925’, PhD Dissertation. Princeton: Princeton University.

Sher, G. 1995. ‘Liberal Neutrality and the Value of Autonomy’, Social Philosophy & Policy.

Shippee, R. 2002. ‘Blessed are the Peacemakers: Faith-Based Approaches to Dispute Resolution’, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 9.

Singer, P. 2006. ‘Moral Experts’, in E. Selinger and R. Crease (eds), The Philosophy of Expertise. New York: Columbia University Press.

Smith, D. 1963. India as a Secular State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

(p.238) Solanki, G. 2011. Adjudication in Religious Family Laws: Cultural Accommodation, Legal Pluralism and Gender Equality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Soutphommasane, T. 2011. ‘Avoid the Hysteria but Reject Sharia’, The Australian (21 May), available at www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/avoid-the-hysteria-but-reject-sharia/story-e6frg6zo-1226059621354, accessed 10 October 2011.

Spinner-Halev, J. 2001. ‘Feminism, Multiculturalism, Oppression and the State’, Ethics, 112.

———. 2004. ‘Autonomy, Association and Pluralism’, in A.I. Eisenberg and J. Spinner-Halev (eds), Minorities Within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2005. ‘Hinduism, Christianity, and Liberal Religious Toleration’, Political Theory, 33.

Strawson, J. 1995. ‘Islamic Law and English Texts’, Law and Critique, 6.

Subramani, A. 2013. ‘Row over Madras HC’s Ruling on Live-In Relations’, The Times of India (19 June), available at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Row-over-Madras-HCs-ruling-on-live-in-relations/articleshow/20657918.cms, accessed 17 July 2014.

Subramanian, N. 2008. ‘Legal Change and Gender Inequality: Changes in Muslim Family Law in India’, L & Soc Inquiry, 33.

Sullivan, D. 1991–2. ‘Gender Equality and Religious Freedom: Towards a Framework for Conflict Resolution’, New York University of International Law and Politics, 24.

Sunder, M. 2001. ‘Cultural Dissent’, Stanford Law Reviews, 54(3): 495–567.

Taliaferro, C. 2008. ‘Philosophy of Religion’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall editon), available at plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/philosophy-religion/, accessed 16 November 2011.

Tambiah, S.J. 1990. ‘Reflections on Communal Violence in South Asia’, The Journal of Asian Studies, 49.

———. 1998. ‘The Crisis of Secularism in India’, in R. Bhargava (ed.), Secularism and its Critics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Tamir, Y. 1993. Liberal Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

———. 1999. ‘Siding With the Underdogs’, in S.M. Okin, and others (eds), Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Taylor, C. 1994. ‘Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition’, in C. Taylor, A. Gutmann, and J. Habermas, Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

———. 2008. ‘The Future of the Religious Past’, in Hent de Vries (ed.), Religion: Beyond a Concept. New York: Fordham University Press.

(p.239) Thapar, R. 1989. ‘Imagined Religious Communities? Ancient History and the Modern Search for a Hindu Identity’, Modern Asian Studies.

The Asian Age (New Delhi, 18 August 2010). ‘Personal Law Bill to be Amended’, available at www.asianage.com/india/personal-law-bill-be-amended-493, accessed 27 October 2011.

The Australian (23 May 2011). ‘Even Muslim Jurists are Divided about what Sharia is’, available at www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/story-fn558imw-1226060688189, accessed 10 October 2011.

The Deccan Herald (7 March, 2011). ‘No Access to Quota Benefits after Conversion: Court’, available at www.deccanherald.com/content/143863/no-access-quota-benefits-conversion.html, accessed 20 November 2011.

The Economist (26 February 2009). ‘Even Online, the Neocortex is the Limit’, available at www.economist.com/node/13176775?story_id=13176775, accessed 20 November 2011.

———. (London, 20 August 2011). ‘China and the Vatican: Your Billion or Ours?’, available at www.economist.com/node/21526402, accessed 14 November 2011

The Express Tribune (17 October 2011). ‘Hindu Community Leaders Disagree on Divorce Clause’, available at tribune.com.pk/story/275674/hindu-community-leaders-disagree-on-divorce-clause/, accessed 9 November 2011.

The Hindu (Chennai, 17 August 2005). ‘Plea against Muslim Personal Law Board Setting Up Parallel System’, available at www.thehindu.com/2005/08/17/stories/2005081703311300.htm, accessed 14 November 2011.

———. (17 March 2008). ‘Women Personal Law Board Unveils New “Nikahnama”’, available at www.hindu.com/2008/03/17/stories/2008031759171700.htm, accessed 20 November 2011.

———. (Tiruchi, 21 November 2012). ‘Codifying Islamic Law with Women’s Rights in Mind’, available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-tamilnadu/codifying-islamic-law-with-womens-rights-in-mind/article4117970.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

———. (2 December 2012). ‘Muslim Women Prefer Shariah Laws’, available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-andhrapradesh/muslim-women-prefer-shariah-laws/article4155471.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

———. (Kochi, 4 February 2014). ‘IUML Seeks to Implead in Inheritance Case’, available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/iuml-seeks-to-implead-in-inheritance-case/article5651401.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

———. (Kozhikode, 9 April 2014). ‘Muslim Organisations Criticises BJP Manifesto’, available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/ (p.240) tp-kerala/muslim-organisations-criticises-bjp-manifesto/article5890034.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

———. (New Delhi, 1 June 2014). ‘Katju Backs Uniform Civil Code’, available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/katju-backs-uniform-civil-code/article6071066.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

———. (9 July 2014). ‘End to Illegal Fatwas’, available at http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/end-to-illegal-fatwas/article6190485.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

The Indian Express (New Delhi, 23 May 2012). ‘Sikhs Can Register Marriages Under Anand Marriage Act Now’, available at www.indianexpress.com/news/sikhs-can-register-marriages-under-anand-marriage-act-now/952647, accessed 25 July 2014.

———. (14 March 2014). ‘Pune: All-Women Sharia Court to Redress Grievances of Muslim Women Launched’, available at http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/pune-allwomen-sharia-court-to-redress-grievances-of-muslim-women-launched/, accessed 11 July 2014.

Tönissen, B. and J. Gerritsen. 2010. ‘The Road Not Taken—Islamic Shari’a Courts in the Netherlands’ (14 December) available at www.scribd.com/doc/49194046/The-Road-Not-Taken-Islamic-Shari-a-Courts-in-the-Netherlands, accessed 10 October 2011.

Tribe, L. 2000. American Constitutional Law (3rd edition). New York: Foundation Press.

Upadhyay, R. 2003. ‘Muslim Personal Law: Should it be politicised?’, South Asia Analysis Group, Paper No. 666. Available at www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers7/paper666.html, accessed 9 October 2011.

van der Veer, P. 1987. ‘God must be Liberated! A Hindu Liberation Movement in Ayodhya’, Modern Asian Studies.

Vatuk, S. 2001. ‘“Where Will She Go? What Will She Do?” Paternalism Toward Women in the Administration of Muslim Personal Law in Contemporary India’, in G.J. Larson (ed.), Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

———. 2008. ‘Islamic Feminism in India: Indian Muslim Women Activists and the Reform of Muslim Personal Law’, Modern Asian Studies, 42(2/3).

———. 2009. ‘A Rallying Cry for Muslim Personal Law: The Shah Bano Case and its Aftermath’, in B. Metcalf, Islam in South Asia in Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Venkata Subbarao, G.C. 1979. Family Law in India: Hindu law, Mahomedan law, and Personal Law of Christians, Parsis, etc., including Law of Testamentary and Intestate Succession (3rd edition). Madras: C. Subbiah Chetty.

(p.241) Venkatesan, J. 2014. ‘Fatwas Not Legal’, The Hindu (New Delhi, 8 July), available at http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/fatwas-not-legal-says-sc/article6187649.ece, accessed 12 July 2014.

Venkatesan, V. 2013. ‘End vs Means’, Frontline (21 August), available at http://www.frontline.in/cover-story/ends-vs-means/article5037707.ece, accessed 11 July 2014.

———. 2013a. ‘Inconsistencies in Special Marriage Act’, Frontline (21 August), available at http://www.frontline.in/cover-story/inconsistencies-in-special-marriage-act/article5037686.ece, accessed 11 July 2014.

Virdi, P.K. 1972. The Grounds for Divorce in Hindu and English Law: A Study in Comparative Law, pp. 39–42. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Volf, M. 1998. After Our Likeness: The Church as the Image of the Trinity. Grand Rapids, Mich: WB Eerdmans.

Volokh, E. 2011. ‘May American Court Appoint Only Muslim Arbitrators, Pursuant to an Arbitration Agreement?’, The Volokh Conspiracy (3 January), available at volokh.com/2011/01/03/may-american-court-appoint-only-muslim-arbitrators-pursuant-to-an-arbitration-agreement/, accessed 9 October 2011.

Waldron, J. 1989. ‘Autonomy and Perfectionism in Raz’s The Morality of Freedom’, Southern California Law Review, 62.

———. 2005. ‘Moral Autonomy and Personal Autonomy’, in J. Christman and J. Anderson (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walzer, M. 1985. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Oxford: Blackwell.

———. 1997. On Toleration (Castle Lectures in Ethics, Politics, and Economics). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Washbrook, D.A. 1981. ‘Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial India’. Modern Asian Studies, London, 15.

Washovsky, M. 1994. ‘Halakhah and Ulterior Motives: Rabbinic Discretion and the Law of Conversion’, in W. Jacob and M. Zemer (eds), Conversion to Judaism in Jewish Law. Pittsburgh: Rodef Shaldom Press.

Watson, G. 1975. ‘Free Agency’, Journal of Philosophy.

Weinrib, L. 2008. ‘Ontario’s Sharia Law Debate: Law and Politics under the Charter ’, in R. Moon (ed.), Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.

Weirtheimer, A. 1987. Coercion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wellman, C. 2003. ‘The Paradox of Group Autonomy’. Social Philosophy and Policy, 20.

(p.242) Werbner, P. 2000. ‘Divided Loyalties, Empowered Citizenship? Muslims in Britain’, Citizenship Studies, 4.

The Westminster Confession of Faith. 1646. Chapter XXV, available at www.reformed.org/documents/westminster_conf_of_faith.html, accessed 16 June 2015.

Westra, H. 1939. ‘Custom and Muslim Law in the Netherlands East Indies’, Transactions of Grotius Society, 25.

Whelan, F. 1983. ‘Prologue: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem’, in J. Pennock and J. Chapman (eds), Liberal Democracy. New York: New York University.

Williams, R. 2008. ‘Archbishop’s Lecture—Civil and Religious Law in England: A Religious Perspective’, available at www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/articles.php/1137/archbishops-lecture-civil-and-religious-law-in-england-a-religious-perspective#Lecture, accessed 9 November 2011.

Williams, R.V. 2006. Postcolonial Politics and Personal Laws: Colonial Legal Legacies and the Indian State. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Willsher, K. 2014. ‘France’s Burqa Ban Upheld by Human Rights Court’, The Guardian (1 July), available at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/01/france-burqa-ban-upheld-human-rights-court, accessed 19 July 2014.

Wilson, R. 1912[1895]. Anglo-Muhammadan Law: A Digest Preceded by a Historical and Descriptive Introduction of the Special Rules Now Applicable to Muhammadans as such by the Civil Courts of British India, with Full References to Modern and Ancient Authorities (4th edition). London: W Thacker & Co.

Working Group on Women’s Rights. 1996. ‘Reversing the Option: Civil Codes and Personal Laws’, Economic and Political Weekly, 31.

Wright, T.P. 1999. ‘Universal Human Rights vs Muslim Personal Law: The Shah Bano Begum Case in India’, Studies in Contemporary Islam, 1.