Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
India's RisksDemocratizing the Management of Threats to Environment, Health, and Values$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Raphaelle Moor and M.V. Rajeev Gowda

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199450459

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199450459.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 27 April 2018

Science and Politics in Indian GM Crop Regulation

Science and Politics in Indian GM Crop Regulation

A U-turn Down a Blind Alley

Chapter:
(p.205) 9 Science and Politics in Indian GM Crop Regulation
Source:
India's Risks
Author(s):

Erik Millstone

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199450459.003.0009

What is the appropriate division of labour between ‘experts’ and policymakers? The Indian Ministry of Environment’s public consultation process in the Bt brinjal case very openly brought these issues to a head in India. This chapter begins by outlining the technocratic and Red Book models of science in regulatory policymaking, and rejects these in favour of a ‘co-dynamic’ framework. This framework is then used to explore the assessment of the possible risks from GM brinjal; exposing the non-scientific and unacknowledged policy assumptions and judgements underlying Mahyco’s assessment of risks. These assumptions determined the framing of the questions, what and how much evidence was sufficient, and the criteria for interpreting the evidence about Bt brinjal. Criticizing the technocratic framework underlying the Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India Bill (BRAI Bill), this chapter concludes that it is time that policy stakeholders recognize that their scientific assessments are framed by ‘up-stream’ policy judgements and assumptions.

Keywords:   Regulation, technological risks, science and policy, technocratic framework, Bt brinjal, BRAI Bill, scientific risk assessments

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .