This introductory chapter begins by outlining the thesis of the book. It argues, contrary to Sigmund Freud and others, that the claim that it would have been better never to have come into existence is not nonsense. It then describes the pro-natal bias against which the book's anti-natal arguments have to contend. The chapter concludes with an outline of the subsequent chapters and offers a reader's guide.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.