Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Mind Design and Minimal Syntax$

Wolfram Hinzen

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780199289257

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2007

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289257.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 18 October 2017

(p.278) References

(p.278) References

Mind Design and Minimal Syntax
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Abler, W. (1989). ‘On the particulate principle of self-diversifying systems’, Journal of Social and Biological Structures 12: 1–13.

Abney, S. (1987). ‘The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect’, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

Aboh, E. (2004). ‘Topic and Focus within D’, Linguistics in the Netherlands, 1–12.

Ahouse, J. C. and Berwick, R. (1998). ‘Darwin on the mind’, The Boston Review 23(2): 36–41.

Amundson, R. (1994). ‘Two concepts of constraint’, Philosophy of Science 61: 556–78.

—— (1998). ‘Typology reconsidered’, Biology and Philosophy 13: 153–77.

Anderson, S. R. and Lightfoot, D. (2002). The Language Organ. Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Antony, L. and Hornstein, N. (eds.) (2003). Chomsky and his Critics (Oxford: Blackwell).

Arthur, W. (2002). ‘The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary development biology’, Nature 415, 14 Feb. 2002, 757–64.

Atran, S. (1990). Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Baker, M. (1997). ‘Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 73–137.

—— (2001). The Atoms of Language (New York: Basic Books).

—— (2003). Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Baltin, M. and Collins, C. (eds.) (2001). The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory (Oxford: Blackwell).

Barber, A. (ed.) (2003). Epistemology of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.) (1992). The Adapted Mind (New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Barsky, R. (1998). Noam Chomsky: A Life of Dissent (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Beatty, J. (ed.) (2001), Thinking about Evolution: Essays in Honor of Richard C. Lewontin, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Bell, C. (1833). The Hand, Its Mechanism and Vital Endowments as Evincing Design, Bridgewater Treatise, Treatise IV (London: William Pickering).

Belletti, A. (1990). Generalized Verb Movement: Aspects of Verb Syntax (Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier).

—— (ed.) (2004), Structures and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Bernstein, J. B. (2001). ‘The DP Hypothesis: Identifying clausal properties in the nominal nomain’, in Baltin and Collins (eds.), 536–61.

Berwick, R. C. (1997). ‘Syntax facit saltum’, Journal of Neurolinguistics 10(2/3): 231–49.

Bever, T., Fodor, J., and Garrett, M. (1974). The Psychology of Language (New York: McGraw-Hill).

Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of Language (Ann Arbor: Karoma).

(p.279) Bickerton, D. (1990). Language and Species (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Block, N. (1995). ‘The mind as the software of the brain’, in D. N. Osherson and E. E. Smith (eds.), Thinking. An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. 3 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 377–426.

Bloom, P. (2000). How Children Learn the Meanings of Words (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Boeckx, C. (2004). Bare Syntax. MS, Harvard University.

—— and Hornstein, N. (2005). ‘The varying aims of linguistic theory’, in Julie Franck and Jean Briemont (eds.), Cahier Chomsky (Paris: L'Herne).

Borer, H. (2005), Structuring Sense: An Exoskeletal Trilogy, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Boysson-Bardies, B. (1999). How Language Comes to Children (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Brandon, R. N. (1988). ‘Levels of selection’, repr. in Hull and Ruse (eds.), 176–97.

Brandt, R. (1988). ‘John Locke’, in J.-P. Schobinger (ed.), Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts, Vol. 3 (Basel: Schwabe & Co. AG), §29.

Brock, W. H. (1992). The Fontana History of Chemistry (London: Fontana).

Brody, M. (2003), Towards an Elegant Syntax, Routledge Leading Linguists (London: Routledge).

Brouwer, W. (1980). ‘Einstein and Lorentz: The structure of a scientific revolution’, American Journal of Physics 48(6): 425–31.

Caramazza, A. and Shapiro, K. (2004). ‘Language categories in the brain: Evidence from aphasia’, in Belletti (ed.), 15–38.

Carey, S. (1982). ‘Semantic development: The state of the art’, in L. Gleitman and E. Wanner (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press), 347–89.

—— (1998). ‘Knowledge of number: Its evolution and ontogeny’, Science 282: 641–2.

—— (2004). ‘Bootstrapping and the origin of concepts’, Daedalus, 59–68.

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999). The Origins of Complex Language: An Inquiry into the Evolutionary Beginnings of Sentences, Syllables, and Truth (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

—— (forthcoming). ‘The evolutionary origin of morphology’, in Maggie Tallerman (ed.), Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Chametzky, R. A. (2000). Phrase Structure: From GB to Minimalism (Oxford: Blackwell).

—— (2003). ‘Phrase structure’, in Hendrick (ed.), 192–225.

Changeux, J. P. and Dehaene, S. (1996). ‘Neuronal models of cognitive functions associated with the prefrontal cortex’, in A. R. Damadio, H. Damasio, and Y. Christen (eds.), Neurobiology of Decision-making (Berlin/New York: Springer).

Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How Monkeys see the World: Inside the Mind of another Species (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

—— —— (1997). ‘Why animals don't have language’, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge University, March 1997.

Cherniak, C. (1995). ‘Neural component placement’, Trends Neurosciences 18: 522–7.

—— (2005). ‘Innateness and brain-wiring optimization: Non-genomic nativism’, in A. Zilhao (ed.), Cognition, Evolution, and Rationality (London: Routledge).

(p.280) Chomsky, N. (1959). A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior, Language 35(1): 26–58.

—— (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (1966). Cartesian Linguistics (New York and London: Harper and Row).

—— (1970). ‘Remarks on Nominalization’, in R. A. Jacob and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar (Waltham, MA: Ginn), 184–221.

—— (1972). Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar (The Hague: Mouton).

—— (1986). Barriers (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (1995). The Minimalist Program (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (1998). ‘Minimalist inquiries: The framework’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics; revised version in R. Martin et al. (eds.) (2000), Step by Step (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 89–156. Quoted as MI.

—— (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

—— (2001a). ‘Derivation by Phase’, in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 1–52. Quoted as DBP.

—— (2001b). ‘Beyond Explanatory Adequacy’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20. Reprinted with revisions in Belletti (ed.), 104–31. Quoted as BEA.

—— (2002). On Nature and Language, eds. A. Belletti and L. Rizzi (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

—— (2003). ‘Replies to critics’, in Antony and Hornstein (eds.), 255–328.

—— (2005). ‘Three factors in language design’, in Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1, 1–22.

Churchland, P. S. (1981). ‘Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes’, Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90.

—— (1996). ‘Toward a neurobiology of the mind’, in R. Llinás and P. S. Churchland (eds.), The Mind-Brain Continuum (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Clarke, D. (1982). Descartes' Philosophy of Science (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

Clements, G. N. and Hume, E. V. (1995). ‘The internal organization of speech sounds’, in J. A. Goldsmith, (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory (Oxford: Blackwell), 245–306.

Collins, C. (1997). Local Economy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (2002). ‘Eliminating labels’, in Epstein and Seely (eds.), 42–64.

Conway Morris, S. (2003). Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1992). ‘The Psychological Foundations of Culture’, in Barkow, Cosmides, and Tooby (eds.), 19–136.

—— —— (1997). ‘Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer’, <http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/primer.html>.

Cottingham, J. (1976). Descartes' Conversation with Burman (Oxford: Clarendon).

Crain, S. and Pietroski, P. (2001). ‘Nature, Nurture and Universal Grammar’, Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (2): 139–86.

—— and Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments in the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Crystal, D. (2000). Language Death (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

(p.281) Culicover, P. (1997). Principles and Parameters (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press).

Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern-day ‘Wild Child’ (New York: Academic Press).

Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens (San Diego: Harvest Books).

Darnell, M., Moravcsik, E., Newmeyer, F., Noonan, M., and Wheatley, K. (eds.) (1999). Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, 2 vols. (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins).

Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, repr. 1968 (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

Davidson, D. (1986). ‘A nice derangement of epitaphs’, in E. Lepore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Blackwell) 433–46.

—— (1990). ‘The structure and content of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 87: 279–328.

Davies, P. and Gribbin, J. (1991). The Matter Myth (London: Viking).

Dawkins, R. (1976/1989). The Selfish Gene, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

—— (1986). The Blind Watchmaker (Norton: New York).

—— (1995). River out of Eden (Phoenix: Orion Books).

—— (1998). ‘Universal Darwinism’, in Hull and Ruse (eds.), 15–37.

Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea (New York: Simon & Schuster).

Derrida, J. (1972). ‘Fines hominis’, in id., Marges de la philosophie, (Paris: Éditions de Minuit).

Descartes, R. (1637/1984). Discours de la Méthode, Introduction et notes par Et. Gilson (Paris: Vrin).

—— (1644/1983). Principles of Philosophy, trans. V. R. Miller and R. P. Miller (Dordrecht: Reidel).

Devitt, M. and Sterelny, K. (1987). Language and Reality (Oxford: Blackwell).

—— (2003). ‘Linguistics is not Psychology’, in Barber (ed.), 107–39.

Dirac, P. (1968). ‘Methods in theoretical physics’, in: A. Salam et al., From a Life of Physics; Evening lectures at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy. A special supplement of the International Atomic Energy Agency Bulletin, Austria.

Doolittle, W. F. (2000). ‘Uprooting the Tree of Life’, Scientific American 282 (2): 90–5.

Edelman, G. (1992). Bright Air, Brilliant Fire (New York: Basic Books).

Eimas, P. (1985). ‘Sprachwahrnehmung beim Säugling’, Spektrum der Wissenschaft, March 1985.

Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. (1972). ‘Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism’, in T. J. M. Schopf (ed.), Models in Palaeobiology (San Francisco: Freeman Cooper).

Elman, J. L., Bates, E., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., and Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Emerton, N. E. (1984). The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

Emmorey, K. (2001). Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).

Epstein, S. (1999). ‘Un-Principled syntax: The derivation of syntactic relations’, in Epstein and Hornstein (eds.), 317–46.

(p.282) Epstein, S. and Hornstein, N. (eds.) (1999). Working Minimalism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Epstein, S. and Seely, D. (2002). ‘Rule applications as cycles in a level-free syntax’, in Epstein and Seely (eds.), 65–89.

Epstein, S. and Seely, D. (eds.) (2002). Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program (Oxford: Blackwell).

Ferry, L. and Renaut, A. (1985). La pensée 68. Essai sur l'anti-humanisme contemporain (Paris: Gallimard).

Fischer, K. (1994). ‘Das Naturverständnis bei Galilei’, in L. Schäfer and E. Ströker (eds.), Naturauffassungen in Philosophie, Wissenschaft, Technik, vol. 2 (Freiburg/Munich: K. Alber Verlag), 149–84.

Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (1981). ‘The present status of the innateness controversy’, in id. (ed.), Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

—— (1983). The Modularity of Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (1990). Reply to Dretske's ‘Does Meaning Matter’, in Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Information, Semantics, and Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell), 28–35.

—— (1998). Concepts. Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong (Oxford: Clarendon).

—— (2000). The Mind Doesn't Work that Way (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (2003). Hume Variations (Oxford: Clarendon).

—— (2004). ‘Having concepts: a brief refutation of the twentieth century’, Mind and Language 19(1): 29–47.

—— and Lepore, E. (2002). The Compositionality Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

—— and Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). ‘Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis’, Cognition 28, 3–71.

Fox, D. (2000), Economy and Semantic Interpretation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (2003), ‘On Logical Form’, in Hendrick (ed.), 82–123.

Frampton, J. and Gutmann, S. (1999). ‘Cyclic computation: A computationally efficient minimalist syntax’, Syntax 2(1): 1–27.

—— (2002). ‘Crash-Proof syntax’, in Epstein and Seely (ed.), 90–105.

Friedman, M. (1993). ‘Remarks on the history of science and the history of philosophy’, in P. Horwich (ed.), World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 37–54.

—— (2000). A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger (Chicago: Open Court).

Fromkin, V. A. (1997). ‘Some thoughts about the brain/mind/language interface’, Lingua 100: 3–27.

Fukui, N. (2001). ‘Phrase structure’, in Baltin and Collins (eds.), 374–406.

Galileo Galilei (1632). Dialogo, Opere di Galileo Galilei, 1890–1909, 2nd edn. 1929–39, ed. A. Favaro, edizione nazionale, vol.7 (Florence: Giunti-Barbara).

Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The Organization of Learning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (1995). ‘The replacement of general-purpose theories with adaptive specializations’, in Gazzaniga (ed.), 1255–67.

(p.283) Gallistel, C. R. (1998). ‘Brains as symbol processors: The case of insect navigation’, in S. Sternberg and D. Starborough (eds.), Conceptual and Methodological Foundations, vol. 4 of An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Series ed. by D. Osherson (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— and Gibbon, J. (2001). ‘Computational versus associative models of simple conditioning’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 10: 146–50.

Garber, D. (1992). ‘Science and certainty in Descartes’, in v. Chappell (ed.), René Descartes, Part I (New York: Garland), 284–322.

Gaukroger, S. (1993). ‘Descartes: Methodology’, in G. H. R. Parkinson (ed.), The Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Rationalism, Routledge History of Philosophy, Vol. IV (London and New York: Routledge), 167–200.

Gazzaniga, M. (1992). Nature's Mind (New York: Basic Books).

Gazzaniga, M. (ed.) (1995). The Cognitive Neurosciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (ed.) (1997). Conversations in the Cognitive Neurosciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Gillett, C. and Loewer, B. (eds.) (2001). Physicalism and its Discontents (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Gleitman, L., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Pappafragou, A., and Trueswell, J. C. (2005). ‘Hard words’, Language Learning and Development 1(1): 23–64.

Godfrey-Smith, P. (1996). Complexity and the function of mind in nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Golinski, J. (1995). ‘“Matter” and “Mechanical Philosophy”’, in J. Yolton et al. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Enlightenment (Oxford: Blackwell).

Goldin-Meadow, S. and Mylander, C. (1990). ‘Beyond the input given: The child's role in the acquisition of language’, Language 66: 323–55.

Gooding, D. (1992). ‘Putting agency back into experiment’, in A Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 65–112.

Goodwin, B. (1994). How the Leopard Changed its Spots (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholoon).

Gopnik, M. (1990). ‘“A Rube Goldberg machine par excellence”, Commentary on Pinker and Bloom (1990)’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(4): 734–5.

Gottlieb, G. (2002). ‘Developmental-behavioral initiation of evolutionary change’, Psychological Review 109: 211–18.

Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful Life (London: Penguin).

—— (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).

—— and E. S. Vrba (1982). ‘Exaptation—A missing term in the science of form’, repr. in Hull and Ruse (eds.) (1998), 52–71.

—— and Lewontin, R. (1978). ‘The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205: 581–98.

Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Grodzinsky, J. (2004). ‘Variation in Broca's region: Preliminary cross-linguistic comparisons’, in L. Jenkins (ed.) (2004).

Grodzinsky, Y. and Amunts, K. (eds.) (2006). Broca's Region (New York: Oxford University Press).

Grohman, K. (2003). ‘Successive cyclicity under (anti-)local considerations’, Syntax 6 (3): 260–312.

(p.284) Guasti, M. T. (2003). Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Hacking, I. (1982). ‘Experimentation and scientific realism’, Philosophical Topics 13: 71–87.

—— (1983). Representing and Intervening (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

—— (1992). ‘The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences’, in Pickering (ed.), 30–64.

Hadley, R. F. (2004). ‘On the proper treatment of systematicity’, Mind and Machines 14: 145–72.

Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Hallman, P. (2004). ‘Symmetry in structure building’, Syntax 7 (1): 79–100.

Harré, R. and Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal Powers. A Theory of Natural Necessity (Oxford: Blackwell).

Hammerstein, P. and Leimar, O. (2002). ‘Ants on a Turing trail’, Nature 418: 141–2.

Hauser, M. D. (1996). The Evolution of Communication (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (2000). Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think (New York: Holt).

—— Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T. (2002). ‘The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?’, Science 298: 1569–79.

—— D. Weiss, and Marcus, G. (2002). ‘Rule learning by cottom-top tamarins’, Cognition 86: B15–B22.

—— E. S. Spelke (in press). ‘Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human Knowledge; A case study of mathematics’, in M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The cognitive neurosciences, vol. 3, Cambridge; MA: MIT Press.

Heim, I. and Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar (Oxford: Blackwell).

Heidegger, M. (1952). ‘Über den Humanismus’ (Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann 2000).

Hespos, S. J. and Spelke, E. S. (2004). ‘Conceptual precursors to language’, Nature 430: 453–6.

Hendrick, R. (ed.) (2003), Minimalist Syntax (Oxford: Blackwell).

Higginbotham, J. (1985). ‘On semantics’, in Linguistic Inquiry 16 (4): 547–93.

—— (1993). ‘Grammatical form and logical form’, in Philosophical Perspectives 7: 173–96.

—— (2002). ‘Some consequences of compositionality’, MS, University of Southern California.

Hinzen, W. (2003a). ‘Truth's fabric’, Mind and Language 18 (2): 194–219.

—— (2003b). ‘Real dynamics’, in J. Peregrin (ed.), Meaning: The Dynamic Turn. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, 12 (Oxford: Elsevier), 91–118.

—— (2004). ‘Synthese apriori bei Wittgenstein’, Zeitschrift fuer philosophische Forschung 58: 1–28.

—— (2005a). ‘Spencerism and the Causal Theory of Reference’, Biology & Philosophy.

—— (2005b). ‘Truth and the human clause’, forthcoming in G. Siegwart and D. Greimann (eds.), The Illocutionary Role of Truth (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).

—— (2006a). An Essay on Names and Truth (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

—— (2006b). ‘Internalism about truth’, Mind and Society (forthcoming).

Hinzen, W. and Rott, H. (eds.) (2002). Belief and Meaning—Essays at the Interface, Deutsche Bibliothek der Wissenschaften (Frankfurt: Haensel-Hoehenhausen).

Hirschfeld, L. and Gelman, S. (eds.) (1994). Mapping the Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

(p.285) Ho, M.-W. (1984). ‘Environment and heredity in development and evolution’, in M.-W. Ho and W. T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism. An Introduction into the new Evolutionary Paradigm (San Diego: Academic Press), 267–89.

Hornstein, N. (1995). Logical Form (Oxford: Blackwell).

—— (2002). ‘A grammatical argument for a neo-Davidsonian semantics’, in G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 345–64.

—— (2005). ‘Empiricism and rationalism as research programs’, in J.McGilvray (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

—— and P. Pietroski (2002). ‘Does every sentence like this exhibit a scope ambiguity?’, in Hinzen and Rott (eds.).

Huang, J. T. (1995). ‘Logical form’, in Webelhuth (ed.), 125–76.

Hull, D. (1978). ‘A matter of individuality’, Philosophy of Science 45, 335–60.

—— (1986). ‘On human nature’, in Hull and Ruse (eds.) (1998), 383–97.

Hull, D. and Ruse, M. (eds.) (1998). The Philosophy of Biology (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Hume, D. (1739–40/1978). A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Clarendon).

—— (1748/1975). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edn. rev. by P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

Jackendoff, R. (1977). X-bar Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (1994). Patterns in the Mind: Language and Human Nature (New York: Basic Books).

—— (2002). Foundations of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Jacob, F. (1982). The Possible and the Actual (Seattle: University of Washington Press).

James, W. (1880). ‘Great men and their environment’, lecture before the Harvard Natural History Society, published in the Atlantic Monthly, October 1880.

Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Jenkins, L. (ed.) (2004). Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics, (Oxford: Elsevier).

Johnson, K. (2000). ‘How far will quantifiers go?’, in Martin, Michaels, and Uriagerella (eds.), 187–210.

Jungius, J. (1630/1982). Praelectiones Physicae, ed. C. Meinel (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht).

Jusczyk, P. W. (1999). ‘How infants begin to extract words from speech’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (9): 323–8.

Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. (1994). From Discourse to Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer).

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992), Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Katz, J. (1997). Realistic Rationalism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— and Postal, P. (1991). ‘Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 515–54.

Katz, L. D. (ed.) (2000). Evolutionary Origins of Morality (Exeter: Imprint Academic).

Kauffman, S. (1993). Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

—— (1995a). At Home in the Universe. The Search for Laws of Complexity (London: Penguin).

—— (1995b). ‘‘What is life?’ Was Schrödinger right?’, in M. P. Murphy and L. O'Neill, What is Life? The Next Fifty Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

(p.286) Kayne, R. (1994). ‘The Antisymmetry of Syntax’ (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in Generative Grammar (Oxford: Blackwell).

Kepler, J. (1611/1953). Neujahrsgabe oder: Vom Sechseckigen Schnee, trans. F. Rossmann (Berlin: Keiper).

Kim, J. (1996). Philosophy of Mind (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).

Kiss, E. K. (1991). ‘Logical structure and syntactic structure: the case of Hungarian’, in C. T. J. Huang and R. May (eds.), Logical Structure and Syntactic Structure: Cross-linguistic Perspectives (Dordrecht: Reidel), 111–48.

Kitcher, P. (1985). Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (1999). ‘The Hegemony of Molecular Biology’, Biology and Philosophy 14: 195–210.

Koyré, A. (1939/1966). Études galiléennes (Paris: Hermann).

Lakoff, G. (1971). ‘On generative semantics’, in D. Sternberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology (New York: Cambridge University Press), 232–96.

Landau, B. and Gleitman, L. (1985). Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

Langendoen, T. and Postal, P. M. (1984). The Vastness of Natural Language (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Langton, C. G. (1988). ‘Artificial Life’, in id. (ed.), Artificial Life, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, 6 (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley), 1–47.

Larson, R. and Segal, G. (1995). Knowledge of Meaning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Lasnik, H. (1999). ‘On the locality of movement’, in Darnell etal. (eds.), 33–54.

—— (2000). Syntactic Structures Revisited (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— and Uriagereka, J. (2002). ‘The poverty of the challenge’, The Linguistic Review 19: 147–50.

Laurence, S. and Margolis, E. (2001). ‘The poverty of the stimulus argument’, British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 52: 217–76.

Legate, J. and Yang, C. (2002). ‘Empirical re-assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 151–62.

Leiber, J. (1995). ‘On Turing's Turing Test and Why the Matter Matters’, Synthese 104: 59–69.

—— (2001). ‘Turing and the fragility and insubstantiality of evolutionary explanations: a puzzle about the unity of Alan Turing's work with some larger implications’, Philosophical Psychology 14 (1): 83–94.

Leibniz, G. W. (1686/1996). Metaphysische Abhandlung (Hamburg: Meiner).

—— (1704/1996). Neue Abhandlungen über den menschlichen Verstand (Hamburg: Meiner).

Lepore, E. and Ludwig, K. (2002). ‘What is logical form?’, in Preyer and Peter (eds.), 54–90.

Leslie, A. (1994). ‘ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity’, in Hirschfeld and Gelman (eds.), 119–48.

—— (2000). ‘How to acquire a ‘representational theory of mind’, in D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 197–224.

Lewis, D. (1983). ‘Language and languages’, in id., Philosophical Papers, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Lewontin, R. C. (1998). ‘The evolution of cognition’, in D. H. Osherson and E. E. Smith (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science, vol.3 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 107–32.

(p.287) —— (1993). The Doctrine of DNA. Biology as Ideology (London: Penguin).

Lickliter, R. and Honeycutt, H. (2003). ‘Developmental dynamics: towards a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology’, Psychological Bulletin 129 (6): 819–35.

Lindenmeyer, A. and Prusinkiewicz, P. (1990). The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants (New York: Springer).

Locke, J. (1690/1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. P. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon).

Loewer, B. (1999). ‘A guide to naturalizing semantics’, in B. Hale and C. Wright (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language (Oxford: Blackwell), 108–26.

Longobardi, G. (1994). ‘Reference and proper names. A theory of N-Movement in syntax and logical form’, Linguistic Inquiry 25 (4): 609–65.

Lowe, J. (2004). ‘Dualism’, MS, University of Durham, forthcoming in B. McLaughlin and A. Beckermann, Oxford Handbook in the Philosophy of Mind.

Lycan, W. (1994). ‘Functionalism, I and II’, in S. Guttenplan (ed.) (1994), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell), 317–32.

—— (2003). ‘Chomsky on the mind-body problem’, in Antony and Hornstein (eds.), 11–28.

Machamer, P. (1998). ‘Galileo's machines, his mathematics, and his experiments’, in id. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Machover, M. (1996). Set Theory, Logic and their Limitations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Macnamara, J. (1982). Names for Things (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Malachowski, A. R. (ed.) (1990). Reading Rorty (Oxford: Blackwell).

Marantz, A. (1984). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Marcus, G. (1998). ‘Rethinking eliminative connectionism’, Cognitive Psychology 37: 243–82.

—— (2001). The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Margulis, L., and Sagan, D. (2002). Acquiring Genomes: A Theory of the Origin of Species (New York: Basic Books).

Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and Naming in Children—Problems of Induction (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Marler, P. (1991). ‘The instinct to learn’, in S. Carey and R. Gelman (eds.), The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 37–66.

Martin, R. and Uriagereka, J. (2000). ‘Some possible foundations for the minimalist program’, in Martin, Michaels, and Uriagereka (eds.), 1–30.

Martin, R., Michaels, D., and Uriagereka, J. (eds.) (2000). Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (Cambridge: MA: MIT Press).

Martinez, D. E. etal. (1998). ‘Cnidarian homeoboxes and the zootype’, Nature 393: 748–9.

Martinich, A. P. (ed.) (1985). The Philosophy of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Mather, J. A. (1995). ‘Cognition in cephalopods’, Advances in the Study of Behavior 24: 317–53.

Matthews, G. H. (1961). Hidatsa Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Mausfeld, R. and Heyer, D. (2004). Colour Perception: Mind and the Physical World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

May, R. (1977). ‘The Grammar of Quantification’, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

(p.288) Maynard Smith, J. and Szathmáry, E. (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution (Oxford/New York: W.H. Freeman, Spektrum).

Mayr, E. (2000). ‘Darwin's influence on modern thought’, Scientific American July 2000.

—— (2002). ‘Die Autonomie der Biologie’, Zweite Walther Arndt Vorlesung, Naturwissenschaftliche Rundschau 55. Jahrgang, Heft 1, 23–9.

McClelland, J. L., Rumelhard, D. E., and the PDF Research Group (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol. 2 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

McGilvray, J. (1999). Chomsky (Cambridge: Polity Press).

McGinn, C. (1994). Problems in Philosophy: The Limits of Inquiry (Oxford: Blackwell).

McGonigle, B. O. and Chalmers, M. (2002). ‘The growth of cognitive structures in monkeys and men’, in S. B. Fountain, M. D. Bunserg, J. H. Danks, and M. K. McBeath (eds.), Animal Cognition and Sequential Behaviour (Boston: Uluwer Academic Publishers).

—— and Dickinson, A. (2003). ‘Concurrent disjoint and reciprocal classification by Cebus paella in seriation tasks: evidence for hierarchical organization’, Animal Cognition 6: 185–97.

Mehler, J. and Dupoux, E. (1994). What Infants Know (Oxford: Blackwell).

Meinhardt, H. (1995). ‘Dynamics of stripe formation’, Nature 376: 722–3.

Metzner, H. (2000). Vom Chaos zum Bios. Gedanken zum Phänomen Leben (Leipzig: Hirzel).

Millikan, R. (2003). ‘In defense of public language’, in Antony and Hornstein (eds.), 215–37.

Mijuskovic, B. J. (1974). The Achilles of Rationalist Arguments (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).

Mitchison, G. J. (1977). ‘Phyllotaxis and the Fibonacci Series’, Science 196: 270–5.

Molenaar, P. (1986). ‘On the impossibility of acquiring more powerful structures: A neglected alternative’, Human Development 29: 245–51.

Moro, A. (2000). Dynamic Antisymmetry (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— Tettamanti, M., Perani, D., Donati, C., Cappa, S. F., and Fazio, F. (2001). ‘Syntax and the brain: disentangting grammar by selective anomalies’, Neuro Image 13: 110–18.

Mufwene, S. (2001). The Ecology of Language Evolution, Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

—— (2002). ‘What do pidgins and creoles tell us about the evolution of language?’, Long abstract of a talk given at the conference ‘Origin and Evolution of Languages’, Collège de France, 27 September 2002.

Müller, G. B. (1990). ‘Developmental mechanisms at the origin of morphological novelty: A side-effect hypothesis’, in M. H. Niteck: (ed.), Evolutionary Innovations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 99–130.

Nagel, T. (1995). Other Minds (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

—— (1997). The Last Word (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Neander, K. (1995). ‘Explaining complex adaptations’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 583–7.

Newman, S. A. and Comper, W. D. (1990). ‘“Generic” physical mechanisms of morphogenesis and pattern formation’, Development 110: 1–18.

(p.289) Newman, S. A. and Müller, G. B. (1999). Morphological evolution: Epigenetic mechanisms, in Embryonic Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (London: Nature Publishing Group), <http://www.els.net>.

Newmeyer, F. J. (1996). Generative Linguistics—A Historical Perspective (London and New York: Routledge).

Nissenbaum, J. (2000). ‘Investigations of covert phrasal movement’, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

Ospovat, D. (1981). The Development of Darwin's Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Orr, H. A. (1996). ‘Dennett's Strange Idea’, The Boston Review, summer 1996.

Osherson, D. N., Scarborough, D., and Sternberg, S. (eds.) (1998). An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. 4: Methods, Models, and Conceptual Issues, 2nd edn. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Papineau, D. (2001). ‘The rise of physicalism’, in Gillett and Loewer (eds.), 3–36.

Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the Semantics of English (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Peacocke, C. (2002). ‘Three principles of rationalism’, European Journal of Philosophy 10(3): 375–97.

Pennisi, E. (2002). ‘Evo-Devo enthusiasts get down to details’, Science 298 (5595), Nov. 2002: 953–5.

Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1989). ‘Evolution, selection, and cognition: From “learning” to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language’, Cognition 31(1): 1–44.

—— and Uriagereka, J. (2004). ‘The immune syntax: The evolution of the language virus’, in Jenkins (ed.), 342–78.

Pickering, A. (ed.) (1992). Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press).

Pietroski, P. (2002). ‘Function and concatenation’, in Preyer and Peter (eds.), 91–117.

—— (2003). ‘Small Verbs, Complex Events’, in Antony and Hornstein (eds.), 179–214.

Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct (London: Penguin).

—— (1997). How the Mind Works (New York: W. W. Norton).

—— (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (London: Penguin).

—— and Bloom, P. (1990). ‘Natural language and natural selection’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4): 707–84.

—— and Jackendoff, R. (2005). ‘What's special about the human language faculty?’, Cognition 95: 201–63.

—— and Ullman, M. T. (2004). ‘The past and future of the past tense’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (11): 456–63.

Plotkin, H. (1997). Evolution in Mind (London: Penguin).

Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). ‘Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.

Popper, K. (1959). ‘The problem of induction’, repr. in M. Curd and J. A. Cover (eds.) (1998), Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues (New York: W. W. Norton), 426–32.

Postal, P. M. (1972). ‘The best theory’, in S. Peters (ed.), Goals of Linguistic Theory (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

—— (2004). Skeptical Linguistic Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

(p.290) Preyer, G. and Peter, G. (eds.) (2002), Logical Form and Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Premack, D. and Premack, A. J. (1994). ‘Moral belief: Form versus content’, in Hirschfeld and Gelman (eds.), 149–68.

Pullum, G. and Scholz, B. (2002). ‘Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 9–50.

Putnam, H. (1975). ‘The meaning of “meaning”’, in id., Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Mind, Language and Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 215–71.

—— (1992). ‘Replies’, Philosophical Topics 20: 347–408.

Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and Object (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (1969). ‘Natural Kinds’, in id., Ontological Relativity and other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press).

—— (1972). ‘Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language (Dordrecht: Reider), 442–54.

—— (1986). ‘Reply to Gilbert Harman’, in L. E. Hahn and P. A. Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine (La Salle: Open Court), 181–8.

—— (1987). ‘Indeterminacy of translation again’, Journal of Philosophy 84: 5–10.

Raff, R. A. (1996). The Shape of Life. Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press).

Récanati, F. (1993). Direct Reference. From Language to Thought (Oxford: Blackwell).

Rey, G. (2003a). Chomsky, Intentionality and a CRTT, in Antony and Hornstein (eds.), 105–39.

Rey, G. (2003b). ‘Representational content and a Chomskyan linguistics’, in Barber (ed.), 140–86.

Rizzi, L. (1997). ‘The fine-structure of the left periphery’, in L. Haegemann (ed.), Elements of Grammar (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 281–337.

Rogers, G. A. J. (1996). ‘Science and British philosophy: Boyle and Newton’, in S. Brown (ed.), Routledge History of Philosophy, vol. 5 (London: Routledge), 43–68.

Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

—— (1986). ‘Freud and moral reflection’, in J. H. Smith and W. Kerrigan (eds.), Pragmatism's Freud. The Moral Disposition of Psychoanalysis (Baltimore/London: John Hopkins University Press), 1–27.

—— (1990). ‘The priority of democracy over philosophy’, in Malachowski (ed.), 279–302.

—— (1995). ‘Philosophische Voraussetzungen der akademischen Freiheit?’, in Merkur 550: 28–44.

—— (2001). ‘Wider den Dogmatismus. Quine und die Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts’, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 17th–18th February 2001.

Russell, B. (1914/1993). Our Knowledge of the External World (New York: Routledge).

Schank, J. J. and Wimsatt, W. C. (2001). ‘Evolvability: Adaptation and modularity’, in Beatty (ed.), vol.2, 322–35.

Schiffer, S. (1994a). ‘A paradox of meaning’, Nous 28(3): 279–324.

—— (1994b). ‘Thought and language’, in Guttenplan (ed.), 589–94.

Schlosser, G. and Wagner, G. P. (eds.) (2004). Modularity in Development and Evolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

(p.291) Schulthess, P. (1998). ‘Die Philosophische Reflexion auf die Methode’, in J.-P. Schobinger (ed.), Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts, vol. 1 (Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie begründet von F. Überweg) (Basel: Schwabe), 62–120.

Searle, J. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

—— (2002). ‘End of the revolution’, The New York Review of Books, 25 April 2002.

Searls, D. B. (2002). ‘The language of genes’, in Nature 420 (6912): 211–7.

Singer, P. (1999). A Darwinian Left (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

Shea, W. (1998). ‘Galileo Galilei’, in Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie begründet von F. Überweg,. Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts, ed. J.-P. Schobinger, vol. 1, Part 2 (Basel: Schwabe), 777–815.

Slack, J. M. W., Holland, P. W. H., and Graham, C. F. (1993). ‘The zootype and the phylotypic stage’, Nature 361: 490–2.

Smith, N. (2002). Language, Bananas and Bonobos (Oxford: Blackwell).

—— and Tsimpli, I.-M. (1995). The Mind of a Savant (London: Blackwell).

Smolensky, P. (2000). ‘Grammar-based connectionist approaches to language’, Cognitive Science 23: 589–613.

Sober, E. (2001), ‘The two faces of fitness’, in Beatty (ed.), vol.2, 309–21.

Spelke, E. S. (1994). ‘Initial knowledge: Six suggestions’, Cognition 50: 431–45.

—— (2000). ‘Core knowledge’, American Psychologist 55: 1233–43.

Stapp, H. C. (2004). Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).

Stewart, I. (1998). Life's Other Secret. The New Mathematics of the Living World (London: Penguin).

Stokhof, M. (1999). ‘Could semantics be something else? Philosophical challenges for formal semantics’, in J. Gerbrandy etal. (eds.), JFAK50. Essays presented to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his Fiftieth Birthday (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).

—— (2002). ‘Meaning, interpretation, and semantics’, in D. Beaver etal. (eds.), Words, Proofs, and Diagrams (Stanford: CSLI Publications).

Stowe, L. A., Haverkort, M., and Zwarts, F. (2005). ‘Rethinking the neurological basis of language’, Lingua 115 (7): 997–1042.

Sulkowski, G. M. and Hauser, M. C. (2001). ‘Can rhesus monkeys spontaneously subtract?’, Cognition 79: 239–62.

Sutton-Spence, R. L. and Woll, B. (1999). An Introduction to the Linguistics of BSL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Svenonius, P. (2004). ‘On the edge’, in D. Adger, C. de Kat, and G. Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 259–87.

Szabolcsi, A. (1994). ‘The Noun Phrase’, in F. Kiefer and K. Kiss (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 27: The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian (San Diego: Academic Press), 179–274.

Tipton, I. (1996). ‘Locke: Knowledge and its limits’, in S. Brown (ed.), Routledge History of Philosophy, vol. 5 (London: Routledge), 69–95.

Thompson, D'Arcy Wentworth (1917/1966). On Growth and Form (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Todd, L. (1990). Pidgins and Creoles (New York: Routledge).

Torretti, R. (1999). The Philosophy of Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

(p.292) Toulmin, S. and Goodfield, J. (1962). The Architecture of Matter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Tomaselli, S. (1995). ‘Human nature’, in J. Yolton et al. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Enlightenment (Oxford: Blackwell), 229–33.

Turing, A. (1950). ‘Computing machinery and intelligence’, Mind 49: 433–60.

—— (1952). ‘The chemical basis of morphogenesis’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 237: 37–72.

Uriagereka, J. (1998). Rhyme and Reason. An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax (Cambridge: MA: MIT Press).

—— (2002). Derivations. Exploring the Dynamics of Syntax (London: Routledge).

—— (forthcoming). ‘In defence of D-Structure’, MS., University of Maryland. Quoted as DDS.

Voltolini, A. (2001). ‘Why the computational account of rule-following cannot rule out the grammatical account’, European Journal of Philosophy 9(1): 82–105.

Walsh, D. M., Lewens, T., and Ariew, A. (2002). ‘The trials of life: Natural selection and random drift’, Philosophy of Science 69: 452–73.

Wason, P. C. and Reich, S. S. (1979). ‘A verbal illusion’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 31: 591–7.

Webelhuth, G. (ed.) (1995). Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program (Oxford: Blackwell).

Webster, G. and Goodwin, B. (1996). Form and Transformation. Generative and Relational Principles in Biology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Weinberg, S. (1976). ‘The forces of nature’, Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 29 (4): 13–29.

West, G., Brown, J., and Enquist, B. (1997). ‘A general model for the allometric scaling laws in biology’, Science 276: 122–6.

Wigner, E. P. (1960). ‘The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences’, Communications of Pure and Applied Mathematics 13: 001–14.

Williams, G. C. (1992). Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Williams, E. (2003). Representation Theory (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology. The New Synthesis (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press).

—— (1978). On Human Nature (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

—— (1998). Consilience (New York: Knopf).

Wittgenstein, L. (1984). Philosophische Untersuchungen, Werkausgabe vol. I, 1. Aufl. (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp). Quoted as PU.

—— (1989). Vortrag über Ethik, in id., Vortrag über Ethik und andere kleine Schriften, ed. J. Schulte (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

—— (1991). Das Blaue Buch, ed. R. Rees, Werkausgabe vol. V (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

—— (1992). Zettel, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, Werkausgabe vol.8 (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

Wynn, K. (1998). ‘Psychological foundations of number: numerical competence in human infants’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 296–303.

Yamada, J. E. (1990). Laura: A case for modularity of language (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

(p.293) —— (2004). ‘Universal Grammar, statistics or both?’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:10.

Yolton, J. W. (1983). Thinking Matter. Materialism in 18th-Century Britain (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

—— (1984). Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid (Oxford: Blackwell).

—— (1990). ‘Mirrors and veils, thoughts and things: The epistemological problematic’, in Malachowski (ed.), 58–73.

—— et al. (eds.) (1995). The Blackwell Companion to the Enlightenment (Oxford: Blackwell). (p.294)