Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Multiculturalism and the Welfare StateRecognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Keith Banting and Will Kymlicka

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780199289172

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2007

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289172.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 April 2019

Do multiculturalism policies erode the welfare state? An empirical analysis

Do multiculturalism policies erode the welfare state? An empirical analysis

Chapter:
(p.48) (p.49) 2 Do multiculturalism policies erode the welfare state? An empirical analysis
Source:
Multiculturalism and the Welfare State
Author(s):

Keith Banting (Contributor Webpage)

Richard Johnston (Contributor Webpage)

Will Kymlicka (Contributor Webpage)

Stuart Soroka (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289172.003.0002

This chapter introduces a new framework for testing the recognition/redistribution hypothesis. It develops an index of twenty-three different types of MCPs that have been adopted for three different types of minority groups (immigrants, national minorities, and indigenous peoples). Western countries are then categorized in terms of their level of MCPs. Whether countries with higher levels of MCPs have faced an erosion of the welfare state as compared to countries with lower levels of MCPs is tested. It is shown that there is no negative correlation between the strength of a country's commitment to MCPs and its ability to sustain welfare spending or economic redistribution. The chapter also examines the heterogeneity/redistribution hypothesis, and shows that this too is overstated. In general, the size of immigrant groups, national minorities, and indigenous peoples in Western countries does not affect a country's ability to sustain its welfare commitments, although a rapid change in the size of immigrant groups does seem to have an effect. Yet even here, the authors of this chapter argue, there are hints that adopting MCPs can help to mitigate whatever negative effect a rapidly increasing immigrant population may have.

Keywords:   multiculturalism policies, recognition/redistribution hypothesis, immigrants, national minorities, indigenous peoples, Western countries, diversity, heterogeneity/redistribution hypothesis, welfare state, social policy

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .