This chapter argues first that Horwich has failed to make the case that he isn't actually taking sides in the very debate that he rejects as meaningful. In particular, it takes Horwich to be committed to a form of non-reductive realism about all the ‘weird’ sorts of facts mentioned above. Second, the chapter claims that Horwich's arguments for his non-reductive realism are not compelling. Horwich moves too quickly from a point about language and concepts to a point about the world and the facts it contains.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.