Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Words and Thoughts$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Robert Stainton

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780199250387

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2007

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250387.001.0001

Not A Full‐fledged Speech Act?

Chapter:
(p. 49 ) 3 Not A Full‐fledged Speech Act?
Source:
Words and Thoughts
Author(s):

Robert J. Stainton (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250387.003.0003

This chapter considers various arguments that sub-sentence use might not rise to the level of a ‘full-fledged speech act’. Suggested necessary conditions included being a grammatical usage of a linguistic item, expressing a proposition, bearing force, and being literal (in the sense of not being merely conveyed). It then argues that initial doubts notwithstanding, sub-sentence uses actually have all these features.

Keywords:   sub-sentential speech, grammatical usage, linguistic act

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .