Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Cicero as EvidenceA Historian's Companion$

Andrew Lintott

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199216444

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2008

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216444.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 17 August 2018

(p.448) Bibliography

(p.448) Bibliography

Source:
Cicero as Evidence
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

ALEXANDER, M. C., 1976, ‘Hortensius' Speech in Defence of Verres’, Phoenix, 30, 46–52.

—— 2002, The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era (Ann Arbor).

ARANGIO‐RUIZ, V., 1964, Marco Tullio Cicerone. Le orazioni per Publio Quinzio. Per Sesto Roscio Amerino. Per l'attore comico Quinto Roscio. Per Marco Tullio (Verona).

—— and Pugliese Carratelli, G., 1948, ‘Tabulae Herculanenses II’, PP 3, 165–84.

ASTIN, A. E., 1964, ‘Lex Aelia et Fufia’, Latomus, 23, 421–45.

—— 1978, Cato the Censor (Oxford).

AUSTIN, R. G., 1960, M. Tulli Ciceronis pro Caelio Oratio, 3rd edn. (Oxford).

BADIAN, E., 1964, Studies in Greek and Roman History (Oxford).

—— 1965, ‘M. Porcius Cato and the Annexation and Early Administration of Cyprus’, JRS 55, 110–21.

—— 1966, ‘Notes on Provincia Gallia in the late Republic’, in R. Chevallier (ed.), Mélanges d'archéologie et d'histoire offerts à André Piganiol (Paris), 901–18.

—— 1969, ‘Quaestiones Variae’, Historia, 18, 465–75.

—— 1974, ‘The Attempt to try Caesar’, in J. A. S. Evans (ed.), Polis and Imperium: Studies in Honour of Edward Togo Salmon (Toronto), 145–66.

—— 1980, ‘A Fundus at Fundi’, AJP 101, 470–82.

—— 1984a, ‘Three Non‐Trials in Cicero’, Klio, 66, 291–309.

—— 1984b, ‘The Death of Saturninus’, Chiron, 14, 101–47.

BALSDON, J. P. V. D., 1939, ‘Consular Provinces under the Late Republic’, JRS 29, 57–73 and 167–83.

—— 1957, ‘Roman History, 58–56 B.C.: Three Ciceronian Problems’, JRS 47, 15–20.

—— 1958, ‘The Ides of March’, Historia, 7, 80–94.

—— 1960, ‘Auctoritas, Dignitas, Otium’, CQ, NS 10, 43–50.

—— 1963, ‘The Commentariolum Petitionis’, CQ, NS 13, 242–50.

—— 1966, ‘Fabula Clodiana’, Historia, 15, 65–73.

BANNON, C. J., 2000, ‘Self‐Help and Social Status in Cicero' pro Quinctio’, Anc. Soc. 30, 71–94.

BARNES, J., 1986, ‘Cicéron et la guerre juste’, Bull. Soc. franç. Phil. 80, 38–80.

—— and Griffin, M. (eds.), 1997, Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome (Oxford).

BEARD, M., 1986, ‘Cicero and Divination: The Formation of a Latin Discourse’, JRS 76, 33–46.

Bellemore, J., 2005, ‘Cato' Opposition to Caesar in 59 BC’, in Welch and Hillard (eds.), 2005, 225–57.

BERRY, D. M., 1996, Cicero.Pro Sulla Oratio (Cambridge).

—— 2003, ‘Equester ordo tuus est: Did Cicero Win his Cases because of Support from the equites?’, CQ, NS 53, 222–34.

BETHMANN‐HOLLWEG, M. A. von, 1864–6, Das römische Civilprozess, 3 vols. (Bonn).

(p.449) BISPHAM, E., 1997, ‘The End of the Tabula Heracleensis: A Poor Man' Sanctio?’, Epigraphica, 59, 125–56.

BLEICKEN, J., 1959, ‘Ursprung und Bedeutung der Provocation’, ZSS 76, 324–77.

BOTERMANN, H., 1968, Die Soldaten und die römische Politik in der Zeit von Caesars Tod bis die Begründung des Zweiten Triumvirats (Zetemata, 46; Munich).

BRINGMANN, K., 1971, Untersuchungen zum späten Cicero (Hypomnemata, 29; Göttingen).

BRUNT, P. A., 1957, ‘Three Passages from Asconius’, CR, NS 7, 193–5.

—— 1971, Italian Manpower (Oxford).

—— 1988, The Fall of the Roman Republic (Oxford).

BUTLER, S., 2002, The Hand of Cicero (London and New York).

CAIRNS, F, and Fantham, E. (eds.), 2003, Caesar against Liberty? Perspectives on his Autocracy (Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar, 11; Cambridge).

CAMERON, A., 1976, Circus Factions (Oxford).

CAMODECA, G., 1993, ‘Per una redazione delle Tabulae Herculanenses I’, CErc 23, 109–19.

—— 1999, Tabulae Pompeianae Sulpiciorum (TPSulp) (Vetera, 12; Rome).

CAMPBELL, G., 2003, Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura Book Five, Lines 772–1104 (Oxford).

CARANDINI, A., 1986, ‘Domus e insulae sulla pendice settentrionale del Palatino’, BCAR 9, 263–78.

CARY, M., 1923, ‘Asinus germanus’, CQ 17, 103–7.

CIACERI, E., 1926–30, Cicerone e i suoi tempi, 2 vols. (Milan, Genoa, Rome, Naples).

CLARK, A., 2007, Divine Qualities: Cult and Community in Republican Rome (Oxford).

CLASSEN, C. J., 1998, Diritto, retorica, politica: la strategia retorica di Cicerone (Bologna), re‐edition of Recht—Rhetorik—Politik: Untersuchungen zu Ciceros rhetorischer Strategie (Darmstadt, 1985).

COSTA, E., 1899, Le orazioni di diritto privato di M. Tullio Cicerone (Bologna).

—— 1927–8, Cicerone giureconsulto (Bologna).

COURTNEY, E., 1963, ‘The Date of the De Haruspicum Responso’, Philologus, 107, 155–6.

CRAIG, C. P., 1990, ‘Cicero' Strategy of Embarrassment in the Speech for Plancius’, AJP 111, 75–81.

CRAWFORD, J. W., 1984, M. Tullius Cicero: The Lost and Unpublished Orations (Hypomnemata, 80; Göttingen).

—— 1994, M. Tullius Cicero: The Fragmentary Speeches. An Edition with Commentary, 2nd edn. (Am. Class. Stud. 37; Athens, GA).

CRAWFORD, M. H., 1977, ‘Rome and the Greek World: Economic Relationships’, EHR 42–52.

CROOK, J., 1976, ‘Sponsione Provocare: Its Place in Roman Litigation’, JRS 66, 132–8.

—— 1995, Legal Advocacy in the Roman World (London).

CUFF, P. J., 1958, ‘The Terminal Date of Caesar' Gallic Command’, Historia, 7, 445–71.

D'ARMS, J. H., 1981, Commerce and Social Standing in Ancient Rome (Harvard).

DÖRNER, F. K., and Gruben, G., 1953, ‘Die Exedra der Cicerones’, MDAI(A) 68, 63–76.

DOUGLAS, A. E., 1966, M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus (Oxford).

(p.450) DOUGLAS, A. E., 1995, ‘Form and Content in the Tusculan Disputations’, in Powell (ed.), 1995, 197–218.

DYCK, A. R., 1996, A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis (Ann Arbor).

—— 2003a, Cicero, De Natura Deorum Liber I (Cambridge).

—— 2003b, ‘Evidence and Rhetoric in Cicero' Pro Roscio Amerino: The Case against Sex. Roscius’, CQ, NS 53, 235–46.

—— 2004, A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus (Ann Arbor).

DYER, R. R., 1990, ‘Rhetoric and Intention in Cicero' Pro Marcello’, JRS 80, 17–30.

ECK, W., CABALLOS, A., and FERNÁNDEZ, F., 1996, Das senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre (Vestigia, 48, Munich).

ELTON, G. R., 1946, ‘The Terminal Date of Caesar' Gallic Proconsulate’, JRS 36, 18–42.

FANTHAM, E., 2004, The Roman World of Cicero' De Oratore (Oxford).

FERRARY, J.‐L., 1988, ‘Rogatio Servilia agraria’, Athenaeum, 66, 141–64.

—— 1995, ‘The Statesman and the Law in the Political Philosophy of Cicero’, in Laks and Schofield (eds.), 1995, 48–73.

—— 1999, ‘à propos de deux passages des Philippiques’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 1, 215–32.

FEZZI, L., 2003, Falsificazione di documenti pubblici nella Roma tardoreppublicana (133–31 a.C.) ( Florence).

FRAZELL, D., 2004, ‘The Composition and Circulation of Cicero' In Verrem’, CQ, NS 54, 128–42.

FREDERIKSEN, M. W., 1966, ‘Cicero, Caesar, and the Problem of Debt’, JRS 56, 128–41.

FRIER, B. W., 1983, ‘Urban Praetors and Rural Violence’, TAPA 113, 221–41.

—— 1985, The Rise of the Roman Jurists: Studies in Cicero' pro Caecina (Princeton).

FRISCH, H., 1948, ‘The First Catilinarian Conspiracy: A Study in Historical Conjecture’, CM 9, 10–36.

GABBA, E., 1957, ‘Note sulla polemica anticiceroniana di Asinio Pollione’, RSI 69, 317–39.

—— 1958, Appiani Bellorum Civilium Liber Primus (Florence).

GAROFALO, L., 1989, Il processo edilizio: contributo allo studio dei iudicia populi (Padua).

GELZER, M., 1962–4, Kleine Schriften, 3 vols. (Wiesbaden).

—— 1969, Cicero: Ein biographischer Versuch (Wiesbaden).

GILBOA, A., 1974, ‘A Further Comment on the Dating of the Cicero–Matius Correspondence (Fam. XI 27/8)’, Historia, 23, 217–8.

GONZÁLEZ, J., 1986, ‘Lex Irnitana’, JRS 76, 147–243.

GRIFFIN, M. T., 1973, ‘The Tribune C. Cornelius’, JRS 63, 196–213.

—— 1995, ‘Philosophical Badinage in Cicero' Letters to his Friends’, in Powell (ed.), 1995, 325–46.

—— 1997a, ‘The Composition of the Academica: Motives and Versions’, in Inwood and Mansfield (eds.), 1997, 1–35.

—— 1997b, ‘Cicero and Matius on Friendship’, in Barnes and Griffin (eds.), 1997, 86–109.

—— 2001, ‘Piso, Cicero, and their Audience’, in C. Auvray‐Assayas and D. Delattre (eds.), Cicéron et Philodème: la polémique en philosophie à Rome à la fin de la République (Paris), 85–99.

(p.451) —— 2003, ‘Clementia after Caesar: From Politics to Philosophy’, in Cairns and Fantham (eds.), 2003, 157–82.

—— and Atkins, E. M. (eds.), 1991, Cicero. On Duties (Cambridge).

GRILLI, A., 1962, M. Tulli Ciceronis Hortensius (Milan/Varese).

GRIMAL, P., 1967, études de chronologie cicéronienne (années 58 et 57 av. J‐C.) (Paris).

GRUEN, E. S., 1966, ‘P. Clodius: Instrument or Independent Agent?’, Phoenix, 20, 120–30.

—— 1968, Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts 149–78 BC (Cambridge, MA).

—— 1970, ‘Veteres Hostes, Novi Amici’, Phoenix, 24, 237–43.

—— 1971, ‘Some Criminal Trials of the Late Republic: Political and Prosopographical Problems’, Athenaeum, 49, 54–69.

—— 1974, The Last Generation of the Roman Republic (Berkeley and Los Angeles).

GURLITT, L., 1883, ‘Die Briefe Ciceros an M. Brutus in bezug auf ihre Echtheit geprüft’, Philologus Supp. 4, 551–630.

HABICHT, Ch., 1990, Cicero the Politician (Baltimore/London).

HÄFNER, S., 1928, Ciceros literarische Pläne (Diss. Munich).

HEINZE, R., 1909, ‘Ciceros politische Anfänge’, repr. in id., Vom Geist des Römertums, ed. E. Burck, (Darmstadt, 1960), 87–140.

HELDMANN, K., 1976, ‘Ciceros Laelius und die Grenzen der Freundschaft’, Hermes, 104, 72–103.

HENDERSON, M. I., 1950, ‘De Commentariolo Petitionis’, JRS 40, 8–21.

HENDRICKSON, G. L., 1939, ‘Brutus De Virtute’, AJP 60, 401–13.

HENRICHS, A., 1974, ‘Die Kritik der stoischen Theologie in P. Herc. 1428’, CErc 4, 5–32.

HINARD, F., 1985, Les Proscriptions de la Rome républicaine (CEFR 83; Rome).

HIRSCHFELD, O., 1904, ‘Der Endtermin der gallischen Statthalterschaft Caesars’, Klio, 4, 77–88.

—— 1905, ‘Nochmals der Endtermin der gallischen Statthalterschaft Caesars’, Klio, 5, 236–40.

HOMEYER, H., 1964, Die antiken Berichte über den Tod Ciceros und ihre Quelle (Deut. Beitr. z. Altertumswiss. 18; Baden‐Baden).

HORNBLOWER, S., 1995, ‘The Fourth‐Century and Hellenistic Reception of Thucydides’, JHS 105, 47–68.

HUMBERT, J., 1925, Les Plaidoyers écrits et les plaidoiries réelles de Cicéron (Paris).

HUTCHINSON, G. O., 1998, Cicero' Correspondence: A Literary Study (Oxford).

INNES, D. C., 1986, ‘Theophrastus and the Theory of Style’, in W. W. Fortenbaugh (ed.), Theophrastus of Eresus: On his Life and Work (Rutgers Studies in Classical Humanities, 2; New Brunswick, NJ), 251–69.

INWOOD, B., and Mansfield, J. (eds.), 1997, Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero' Academic Books. Proceedings of the 7th Symposium Hellenisticum (Utrecht, August 21–25, 1995) (Leiden, New York, and Cologne).

KERKHECKER, A., 2002, ‘Privato Officio, Non Publico: Literaturwissenschaftliche überlegungen zu Ciceros “pro Marcello” ’, in J. P. Schwindt (ed.), Klassische Philologie inter disciplinas (Heidelberg), 93–149.

KINSEY, T. E., 1971, M. Tulli Ciceronis Pro P. Quinctio Oratio (Sydney).

(p.452) KINSEY, T. E., 1985, ‘The Case against Sextus Roscius of Ameria’, Ant. Class. 54, 188–96.

KYTZLER, B., 1960, ‘Beobachtungen zu den Matius‐Briefen’, Philologus, 104, 48–62.

KORNEMANN, E., 1896, ‘Die historische Schriftstellerei des C. Asinius Pollio’, JbClPh, Supp. 22, 557–691.

KUMANIECKI, K., 1961, ‘De Oratione Tulliana in Toga Candida Habita’, Atti del I congresso internazionale di studi ciceroniani (Rome), i. 157–66.

—— 1970, Les Discours égarés de Cicéron Pro Cornelio (Meded. Kon. Vlaam. Acad. België, Kl. der Lett. 32/8, Brussels).

LABRUNA, L., 1970, Vim fieri veto (Naples).

LAKS, A., and SCHOFIELD, M. (eds.), 1995, Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Political Philosophy. Proceedings of the 6th Symposium Hellenisticum (Cambridge).

LINDERSKI, J., and KAMINSKA‐LINDERSKI, A., 1974, ‘The Quaestorship of Marcus Antonius’, Phoenix, 28, 213–23.

LINTOTT, A., 1965, ‘Trinundinum’, CQ, NS 15, 281–5.

—— 1967, ‘P. Clodius Pulcher—Felix Catilina?’, G&R, NS 14, 157–69.

—— 1968, ‘Nundinae and the Chronology of the Late Roman Republic’, CQ, NS 18, 189–94.

—— 1970, ‘The Tradition of Violence in the Annals of the Early Roman Republic’, Historia, 19, 12–29.

—— 1971, ‘Lucan and the History of the Civil War’, CQ, NS 21, 488–505.

—— 1972a, ‘Provocatio: From the Struggle of the Orders to the Principate’, ANRW I 2. 226–67.

—— 1972b, ‘Imperial Expansion and Moral Decline in the Roman Republic’, Historia, 21, 626–38.

—— 1974, ‘Cicero and Milo’, JRS 64, 62–78.

—— 1980, ‘M. Caelius Rufus and Pausanias’, CQ, NS 30, 385–6.

—— 1981, ‘The leges de repetundis and Associate Measures under the Republic’, ZSS 98, 162–212.

—— 1990a, ‘Electoral Bribery in the Roman Republic’, JRS 80, 1–16.

—— 1990b, ‘Le procès devant les recuperatores d'après les données épigraphiques jusqu'au règne d'Auguste’, RHDFE 68, 1–11.

—— 1997a, ‘Cassius Dio and the History of the Late Roman Republic’, ANRW II 34. 3, 2497–2523.

—— 1997b, ‘The Theory of the Mixed Constitution at Rome’, in Barnes and Griffin (eds.), 1997, 70–85.

—— 2000, ‘Aristotle and the Mixed Constitution’, in R. Brock and S. Hodkinson (eds.), Alternatives to Athens (Oxford), 152–66.

—— 2001–3, ‘Delator and Index: Informers and Accusers at Rome from the Republic to the Early Principate’, Accordia Research Papers, 9, 105–22.

—— 2006, ‘La violenza della lotta degli ordini’, in G. Urso (ed.), Terror et Pavor (I convegni della fondazione Niccolò Canussio, 5; Pisa), 13–19.

LOMAS, K., 2004, ‘A Volscian Mafia? Cicero and his Italian Clients’, in Powell and Paterson (eds.), 2004, 97–116.

(p.453) LONG, A. A, 1995a, ‘Cicero' Politics in De Officiis’, in Laks and Schofield (eds.), 1995, 213–40.

—— 1995b, ‘Cicero' Plato and Aristotle’, in Powell (ed.), 1995, 37–61.

—— and Sedley, D. N., 1987, The Hellenistic Philosophers (Cambridge).

MC DERMOTT, W. C., 1977, ‘The Verrine Jury’, RhM, NF 120, 64–75.

MACK, D., 1937, Senatsreden und Volksreden bei Cicero (Kieler Arbeiten zu klassicher Philologie, 2; Würzburg, repr. Hildesheim 1967).

MALITZ, J., 1987, ‘Die Kanzlei Caesars—Herrschaftsorganisation zwischen Republik und Prinzipat’, Historia, 36, 51–72.

MARINONE, N., 2004, Cronologia ciceroniana (Collana di studi ciceroniani, 6), 2nd edn. by E. Malaspina (Bologna).

MARSHALL, B. A., 1985, A Historical Commentary on Asconius (Columbia, MO).

MARTIN, J., 1970, ‘Die Provokation in der klassischen und späten Republik’, Hermes, 98, 72–96.

MAY, J. M. (ed.), 2002, Brill' Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric (Leiden).

MEIER, C., 1961, ‘Zur Chronologie und Politik in Caesars ersten Konsulat’, Historia, 10, 68–98.

—— 1966, Res Publica Amissa (Wiesbaden).

METTE, H.‐J., 1965, ‘Der junge Zivilanwalt Cicero’, Gymnasium, 72, 10–27.

METZGER, E., 1997, A New Outline of the Roman Civil Trial (Oxford).

—— 2005, Litigation in Roman Law (Oxford).

MEYER, Ed., 1918, Caesars Monarchie und das Principat des Pompejus (Berlin and Stuttgart).

MITCHELL, S., 1979, ‘R.E.C.A.M. Notes and Studies No. 5: A Roman Family in Phrygia’, AS 29, 13–22.

—— 1993, Anatolia, 2 vols. (Oxford).

MITCHELL, T. N. 1979, Cicero: The Ascending Years (New Haven).

—— 1991, Cicero: The Senior Statesman (New Haven).

MOMMSEN, Th., 1857, Die Rechtsfrage zwischen Caesar und dem Senat (Breslau) = Gesammelte Schriften (Berlin, 1905–13) iv. 92–145.

MOREAU, Ph., 1982, Clodiana Religio: un procès politique en 61 av. J.‐C. (Paris).

MORSTEIN‐MARX, R., 2004, Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic (Cambridge).

MUSTAKALLIO, K., 1994, Death and Disgrace: Capital Penalties with Post Mortem Sanctions in Early Roman Historiography (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Dissertationes Humanarum Litterarum 72, Helsinki).

NARDO, D., 1970, Il Commentariolum petitionis: la propaganda elettorale nella ars di Quinto Cicerone (Padova).

NICOSIA, G., 1965, Studi sulla ‘deiectio’ (Milan).

NISBET, R. G. M., 1961a, Cicero: In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio (Oxford).

—— 1961b, ‘The Commentariolum Petitionis: Some Arguments against Authenticity’, JRS 51, 84–7.

OGILVIE, R. M., 1965, A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5 (Oxford).

OOST, S. I., 1955, ‘Cato Uticensis and the Annexation of Cyprus’, CPh 50, 98–112.

(p.454) PAILLIER, J.‐M., 1988, Bacchanalia: la répression de 186 av. J.‐C. à Rome et en Italie (BEFRA 270; Rome).

PINA POLO, F., 1989, Las contiones civiles y militares en Roma (Zaragoza).

PLATSCHEK, J., 2005, Studien zu Ciceros Rede für P. Quinctius (Münch. Beitr. z. Papyrusf. u. ant. Rechtsgesch. 94; Munich).

POCOCK, L. G., 1924, ‘Publius Clodius and the Acts of Caesar’, CQ 18, 59–64.

—— 1926, A Commentary on Cicero In Vatinium (London).

POWELL, J. G. F., 1988, Cato Maior de Senectute (Cambridge).

—— 1994, ‘The rector rei publicae of Cicero' De Re Publica’, SCI 13, 19–29.

—— (ed.), 1995, Cicero the Philosopher (Oxford).

—— and Paterson, J. (eds.), 2004, Cicero the Advocate (Oxford).

RAMBAUD, M., 1953, L'Art de la déformation historique dans les commentaires de César (Ann. de l'univ. Lyon, 3ème sér. 23, Paris).

RAMSEY, J. T., 2003, Cicero: Philippics I–II (Cambridge).

—— 2004, ‘Did Julius Caesar Temporarily Banish Antony from his Inner Circle?’, CQ, NS 54, 161–73.

—— 2005, ‘Mark Antony' Judicial Reform and its Revival under the Triumvirs’, JRS 95, 20–37.

—— and Licht, A., 1997, The Comet of 44 B.C. and Caesar' Funeral Games (American Classical Studies, 39; Atlanta).

RAWSON, E., 1983, Cicero. A Portrait, 2nd edn. (Bristol).

—— 1985, Intellectual Life in the Roman Republic (London).

—— 1991, Roman Culture and Society (Oxford).

RICH, J. W., 1976, Declaring War in the Roman Republic in the Period of Transmarine Expansion (Coll. Latomus, 149, Brussels).

RICHARDSON, J. S., 1971, ‘ The Commentariolum Petitionis’, Historia, 20, 436–42.

—— 1987, ‘The Purpose of the lex Calpurnia de repetundis’, JRS 77, 1–12.

RIGGSBY, A. M., 1999a, ‘Iulius Victor on Cicero' Defenses de Repetundis’, RhM, NF 142, 427–9.

—— 1999b, Crime and Community in Ciceronian Rome (Austin, TX).

—— 2002, ‘The Post Reditum Speeches’, in May (ed.), 2002, 159–93.

ROBBE, U., 1941, ‘L'autonomia dell'actio certae creditae pecuniae e la sua distinzione dalla condictio’, SDHI 7, 35–111.

RODGER, A., 1996, ‘Postponed Business at Irni’, JRS 86, 61–74.

SHACKLETON BAILEY, D. R., 1956, ‘Exspectatio Corfiniensis’, JRS 46, 57–64.

—— 1960, ‘The Credentials of L. Caesar and L. Roscius’, JRS 50, 80–3.

SCHMIDLIN, B., 1963, Das Rekuperatorenverfahren (Fribourg).

SCHMIDT, O. E., 1884, ‘Zur Kritik und Erklärung der Briefen Ciceros an M. Brutus’, JbClPh 30, 617–44.

—— 1893, Der Briefwechsel des M. Tullius Cicero (Leipzig).

SCHMIDT, P. L., 1973, ‘Cicero De Re Publica’, ANRW I 4. 262–333.

SCHOFIELD, M., 1986, ‘Cicero For and Against Divination’, JRS 76, 47–65.

SEAGER, R. J., 1964, ‘The First Catilinarian Conspiracy’, Historia, 13, 338–47.

—— 1965, ‘Clodius, Pompeius and the Exile of Cicero’, Latomus, 24, 519–31.

(p.455) —— 2002, Pompey the Great: A Political Biography, 2nd edn. (Oxford).

SERRAO, F., 1954, La ‘iurisdictio’ del pretore peregrino (Milan).

—— 1956, ‘Appunti sui patroni nei processi repetundarum’, Studi in onore di Pietro de Francisci (Milan), ii. 473–511.

SHERWIN‐WHITE, A. N., 1973, The Roman Citizenship, 2nd edn. (Oxford).

SMITH, R. E., 1957, ‘The Lex Plotia Agraria and Pompey' Spanish veterans’, CQ, NS 7, 82–5.

STEEL, C., 2001, Cicero: Rhetoric and Empire (Oxford).

STEVENSON, T., 2005, ‘Readings of Scipio' Dictatorship in Cicero' De Re Publica (6.12)’, CQ, NS 55, 140–52.

STOCKTON, D. L., 1962, ‘Cicero and the Ager Campanus’, TAPA 93, 471–89.

—— 1971, Cicero: A Political Biography (Oxford).

—— 1975, ‘Quis iustius induit arma’, Historia, 24, 222–59.

STONE, A. M., 2005,‘Optimates: An Archaeology’, in Welch and Hillard (eds.), 2005, 59–94.

STRACHAN‐DAVIDSON, J. L., 1912, Problems of the Roman Criminal Law, 2 vols. (Oxford).

STRASBURGER, H., 1965, ‘Poseidonius on Problems of the Roman Empire’, JRS 55, 40–53.

STROH, K. W., 1975, Taxis und Taktik: Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden (Stuttgart).

—— 2004, ‘De Domo Sua: Legal Problem and Structure’, in Powell and Paterson (eds.), 2004, 313–70.

SUMNER, G. V., 1963, ‘Lex Aelia, Lex Fufia’, AJP 84, 337–58.

—— 1964, ‘Manius or Mamercus?’, JRS 54, 41–8.

—— 1973, The Orators in Cicero' Brutus: Proposopography and Chronology (Phoenix Supp. 11; Toronto).

SYME, R., 1939a, The Roman Revolution (Oxford).

—— 1939b, ‘Observations on the Province of Cilicia’, Anatolian Studies Presented to W. H. Buckler (Manchester, 1939), 299–332; repr. Roman Papers, i (Oxford), 120–48.

—— 1950, ‘A Roman Post‐Mortem’, Todd Memorial Lecture no. 3 (Sydney); repr. Roman Papers, i (Oxford, 1979), 205–17.

—— 1964, Sallust (Berkeley and Los Angeles).

—— 1986, The Augustan Aristocracy (Oxford).

TAYLOR, L. R., 1951, ‘On the Chronology of Caesar' First Consulship’, AJP 72, 254–6.

—— 1961, Party Politics in the Age of Caesar (Berkeley and Los Angeles).

TATUM, W. J., 1993, ‘The Lex Papiria de dedicationibus’, CPh 88, 319–28.

—— 1999, The Patrician Tribune (Chapel Hill and London).

THOMAS, D. F. C., 2005, ‘Priests and Politicians: Reflections on Livy and Cicero' De Domo Sua’, in Welch and Hillard (eds.), 2005, 119–40.

THOMPSON, L. A., 1962, ‘The Relation between Provincial Quaestors and their Commanders‐in‐Chief’, Historia, 11, 339–55.

TOHER, M., 2004, ‘Octavian' arrival in Rome, 44 BC’, CQ, NS 54, 174–84.

TYRRELL, R. Y., and Purser, L. C., 1904–33, The Correspondence of Cicero, 7 vols. (Dublin).

ULLMAN, B. L., 1942, ‘History and Tragedy’, TAPA 73, 25–53.

(p.456) VENTURINI, C., 1969, ‘La repressione degli abusi dei magistrati romani ai danni delle popolazioni soggette fino all lex Calpurnia del 149 a.C.’, BIDR 72, 19–87.

—— 1979, Studi sul crimen repetundarum nell'età repubblicana (Milan).

WALBANK, F. W., 1955, ‘Tragic History: A Reconsideration’, BICS 2 (1955), 4–14.

—— 1957, A Historical Commentary on Polybius, i (Oxford).

—— 1960, ‘History and Tragedy’, Historia, 9, 216–34; repr. in id., Selected Papers: Studies in Greek and Roman Historiography (Cambridge, 1985) 224–41.

WATSON, A., 1965, The Law of Obligations in the Later Roman Republic (Oxford).

—— 1967, The Law of Persons in the Later Roman Republic (Oxford).

—— 1971, The Law of Succession in the Later Roman Republic (Oxford).

WEINSTOCK, S., 1971, Divus Julius (Oxford).

WELCH, K., and HILLARD, T. W. (eds.), 2005, Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic (Swansea).

WHITE, S. A., 1995, ‘Cicero and the Therapists’, in Powell (ed.), 1995, 219–46.

WINTERBOTTOM, M., 2004, ‘Perorations’ in Powell and Paterson (eds.), 2004, 215–30.

WIRSZUBSKI, C., 1954, ‘Cicero' Cum dignitate otium: A Reconsideration’, JRS 44, 1–13.

—— 1961, ‘Audaces: A Study in Political Phraseology’, JRS 51, 12–22.

WISEMAN, T. P., 1966, ‘The Ambitions of Quintus Cicero’, JRS 56, 108–15.

—— 1968, ‘Pulcher Claudius’, HSCP 74, 207–13.

—— 1971, New Men in the Roman Senate 139 B.C–14 A.D. (Oxford).

—— 1974, Cinna the Poet and Other Essays (Leicester).

—— 1985, Catullus and his World (Cambridge).

WOLFF, J. G., 1997, ‘ “Intertium”, und kein Ende?’, BIDR 100, 1–36.

WOOTEN, C. W., 1985, Cicero' Philippics and their Demosthenic Model (Chapel Hill, NC, and London).

WRIGHT, M. R., 1991, Cicero: On Stoic Good and Evil (Warminster).

YAVETZ, Z., 1969, Plebs and Princeps (Oxford).

ZETZEL, J. G., 1995, Cicero, De Re Publica: Selections (Cambridge).

ZULUETA, F. de, 1953, The Institutes of Gaius, ii (Oxford).