Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Sex, Size and Gender RolesEvolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Daphne J. Fairbairn, Wolf U. Blanckenhorn, and Tamás Székely

Print publication date: 2007

Print ISBN-13: 9780199208784

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2007

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 October 2018

Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism in eye-lid geckos (Eublepharidae): the effects of male combat, courtship behavior, egg size, and body size

Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism in eye-lid geckos (Eublepharidae): the effects of male combat, courtship behavior, egg size, and body size

Chapter:
(p.154) Chapter 15 Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism in eye-lid geckos (Eublepharidae): the effects of male combat, courtship behavior, egg size, and body size
Source:
Sex, Size and Gender Roles
Author(s):

Lukáš Kratochvíl

Daniel Frynta

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.003.0017

This chapter summarizes research on sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in eye-lid geckos (Eublepharidae) by integrating morphological, behavioural, and life-history data, and using phylogenetic analyses to determine which variable(s) may explain SSD. These comparisons reveal that male combat has disappeared twice within this family, and both events were associated with losses of male scent glands and male-biased head size dimorphism, which is consistent with the predictions of sexual selection theory. Evolutionary changes in male-male aggression, in the complexity of courtship display, or in relative egg size were not correlated with reversals from male-biased to female-biased SSD. Eublepharids demonstrate Rensch's rule, since in small species females tend to be larger whereas in large species males are larger. An explanation of this common allometric pattern will be necessary for a full understanding of SSD in this family.

Keywords:   Eublepharidae, lizards, Rensch's rule, sexual selection

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .