Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Mapping the LawEssays in Memory of Peter Birks$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Andrew Burrows and Alan Rodger

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780199206551

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206551.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 October 2018

Unjust Enrichment, Discharge for Breach, and the Primacy of Contract

Unjust Enrichment, Discharge for Breach, and the Primacy of Contract

Chapter:
(p.223) 12 Unjust Enrichment, Discharge for Breach, and the Primacy of Contract
Source:
Mapping the Law
Author(s):

Gerard McMeel

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206551.003.0013

This chapter examines the relationship between contract and claims for unjust enrichment (principally for failure of consideration) and argues that, on its true construction, a contract can rule out or limit a restitutionary claim for unjust enrichment even when the contract has been discharged and even where there is no direct contractual link between the claimant and defendant. Focusing on three different contexts (where there is a subsisting contract, where there is a discharged contract, and where there is a mere ‘contractual setting’ between the claimant and defendant), it views the central question about the relationship between contract and unjust enrichment as being whether a contract, as a matter of construction, ousts an otherwise arguable restitutionary claim. This is referred to as a ‘construction’ approach, although one might equally perhaps call it a ‘contracting-out of restitution’ approach.

Keywords:   contract, unjust enrichment, restitutionary claim, law of restitution, construction approach

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .