Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Defamation and Freedom of Speech$
Defamation and Freedom of Speech

Dario Milo

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199204922

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199204922.001.0001

(p. xxi ) Table of Cases

Source:
Defamation and Freedom of Speech
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

  • UK

    • A v B [2005] EMLR 36 133

    • A v B plc [2003] QB 195; [2002] 3 WLR 542, CA 5, 48, 123, 130, 133, 137, 142, 145

    • Adam v Ward [1917] AC 309, HL 97

    • Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research & Marketing (UK) Ltd [2002] EMLR 13, CA 60, 111, 112, 174, 193

    • Al-Misnad v Azzaman Ltd [2003] EWHC 1783 111, 175

    • Allbutt v General Council of Medical Education and Registration (1889) LR 23 QBD 400, CA 99

    • Angel v Stainton [2006] EWHC 637 245

    • Arab News Network v Al-Khazen [2001] EWCA Civ 118, CA (Civ Div) 19

    • Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd [2005] EMLR 33, CA 111, 175, 182

    • Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371, HL 20

    • Associated Newspapers Ltd v His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales [2007] 2 All ER 139 138

    • Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109, HL 129

    • Baldwin v Rusbridger [2001] EMLR 47 175, 265

    • Belfast City Council v Miss Behavin’ Ltd [2007] 1 WLR 1420, HL 140

    • Beloff v Pressdram Ltd [1973] FSR 33 129

    • Berezovsky v Forbes Inc (No 2) [2001] EMLR 45, CA 9, 21, 46–8, 158

    • Berezovsky v Michaels [2000] 1 WLR 1004, HL 2, 30, 232

    • Berkoff v Burchill [1997] EMLR 139, CA 146

    • Blackshaw v Lord [1984] QB 1, CA 72, 108

    • Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 583, CA 29

    • Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 190, 208

    • Bolitho v City of Hackney HA [1998] AC 232, HL 189, 208

    • Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269, CA 61, 257

    • Branson v Bower [2001] EMLR 32; [2002] QB 737, CA 47, 101

    • British Coal Corp v NUM (QBD, 28 June 1996) 68

    • British Steel Corp v Granada Television Ltd [1981] AC 1096, HL 129

    • Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2007] 3 WLR 289, CA 132

    • Bruce v Leisk (1892) 19 R 482 72, 98

    • Bunt v Tilley [2007] 1 WLR 1243 214, 219

    • Byrne v Deane [1937] 1 KB 818, CA 40

    • Campbell v Frisbee [2003] EMLR 3, CA 131, 132

    • Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EMLR 617; [2003] QB 633, CA; [2004] 2 AC 457, HL 5, 9, 21–3, 48, 67, 123, 130, 134, 135, 137, 140, 143, 148, 149, 151, 152, 233, 245, 249–51, 143, 148, 149, 151, 152, 233, 245, 249–51

    • Campbell v MGN Ltd (Costs) [2006] EMLR 1, HL 249

    • Campbell v Spottiswoode (1863) 3 B & S 769; (1863) 32 LJQB 185 31, 32, 36, 101

    • Campbell-James v Guardian Newspapers [2005] EMLR 54 244

    • Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome [1972] AC 1027, HL 223, 226, 235, 236, 262

    • CC v AB [2007] EMLR 11 132

    • Chapman v Ellesmere [1932] 2 KB 431, CA 99

    • Charman v Orion Publishing Group Ltd [2007] 1 All ER 622 111, 175, 193

    • Chase v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2003] EMLR 11, CA 47, 174

      • (p. xxii )

    • Cleese v Clark [2004] EMLR 3 222, 244

    • Collins Stewart Ltd v The Financial Times Ltd (No 2) [2006] EMLR 100 222

    • Cox v MGN Ltd [2006] EWHC 1235 252

    • Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 263, HL 129

    • D v L [2004] EMLR 1, CA 131

    • Dellows Will Trust, Re [1964] 1 WLR 451 157

    • Derbyshire CC v Times Newspapers Ltd [1992] 3 All ER 65, CA; [1993] AC 534, HL 5, 28, 40, 45, 46, 68, 100, 169

    • Dixon v Holden (1868–69) LR 7 Eq. 488 27

    • Douglas v Hello ! Ltd (No1) [2001] QB 967, CA 21, 48, 76, 134

    • Douglas v Hello ! Ltd (No 6) [2003] EMLR 31; [2006] QB 125, CA 134, 233

    • Douglas v Hello ! Ltd (No 8) [2004] EMLR 2 245

    • Emmens v Pottle (1885) 16 QBD 354, CA 212

    • English v Hastie Publishing Ltd [2002] All ER (D) 11 (Feb) 112, 175

    • Field v Local Sunday Newspapers (North) Ltd (No 2) [2003] 1 WLR 1836 47

    • Francome v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [1984] 1 WLR 892, CA 89, 129

    • Fraser v Evans [1969] QB 349, CA 61

    • Gaddafi v Telegraph Group Ltd [2000] EMLR 431, CA 175

    • Galloway v Telegraph Group Ltd [2005] EMLR 7; [2006] EWCA Civ 17; [2006] EMLR 11, CA 22, 48, 111, 175, 193, 223, 233

    • Gathercole v Miall (1846) 15 M & W 319 105, 140

    • GKR Karate (UK) Ltd v Yorkshire Post Newspapers Ltd [2000] EMLR 410; [2000] EMLR 396, CA 112, 166, 175, 191

    • Godfrey v Demon Internet Ltd [2001] QB 201 213

    • Goldsmith v Bhoyrul [1998] QB 459 100

    • Goldsmith v Sperrings Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 478, CA 212, 215, 218, 237

    • Goody v Odhams Press [1967] 1 QB 333, CA 20

    • Greene v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 1462; [2005] QB 972, CA 22, 61, 122, 172, 257, 281, 283

    • Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2001] EMLR 18, CA; [2002] UKHL 40; [2002] 1 WLR 2034, HL 22, 111, 164, 165, 176, 191, 257

    • Hamilton v The Guardian Financial Times, 22 July, 1995 172

    • Harrison v Bush (1855) 5 E & B 344 72, 99

    • Heil v Rankin [2001] QB 272, CA 244

    • Henry v British Broadcasting Corporation [2005] EWHC 2787; [2006] 1 All ER 154 (Costs) 98, 112, 175, 249

    • Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135, HL 187

    • Howlett v Holding [2003] EWHC 286 175

    • Initial Services Ltd v Putterill [1968] 1 QB 396, CA 129

    • Irving v Associated Newspapers Ltd [1999] CLY 1625 112, 175

    • Irving v Penguin Books Ltd [2000] EWHC QB 115 172

    • Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946, CA 226, 237, 257, 266

    • Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl (No 2) [2005] QB 904, CA 158, 278

    • Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2006] (No 3)UKHL 44; [2007] 1 AC 359, HL 28, 40, 64, 73, 86, 97, 109, 113, 123, 158, 175, 176, 182, 190, 192, 193, 225, 229, 231, 262, 281

    • Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL [2007] 1 AC 359 262, 281

    • James Gilbert Ltd v MGN Ltd [2000] EMLR 680 112, 175

    • Jockey Club v Buffham [2003] QB 462 129

      • (p. xxiii )

    • John v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2006] EMLR 27 136

    • John v MGN Ltd [1997] QB 586, CA 222, 243, 244, 283

    • Jones v E Hulton & Co [1910] AC 20, HL 185, 186, 212

    • Jones v Pollard [1997] EMLR 233, CA (Civ Div) 40

    • Kearns v General Council of the Bar [2003] EMLR 27, CA 85

    • Keays v Guardian Newspapers Ltd [2003] EWHC 1565 47

    • Khan v Ahmed [1957] 2 WLR 1060, DC 98

    • Khan v Euro Bangla Newspapers Ltd (2004) (50) Media Lawyer 11 175

    • Kiam v MGN Ltd [2003] QB 281, CA 234, 263

    • King v Telegraph Group Ltd [2005] 1 WLR 2282, CA 250, 252

    • Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary [2002] 2 AC 122, HL 224

    • Lady Archer v Williams [2003] EMLR 38 152, 245

    • Leeds City Council v Channel Four Television Corp [2007] 1 FLR 678 129

    • Lewis v King [2005] EMLR 4, CA 216

    • Ley v Hamilton (1935) 153 LT 384, HL 39, 230

    • Lillie v Newcastle CC (2002) 146 SJBL 225 234, 263

    • Lion Laboratories Ltd v Evans [1985] 1 QB 526, CA 129

    • Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England [2006] EWHC 2533 (Admin) 67

    • London Artists v Littler [1969] 2 QB 375, CA 104

    • London Regional Transport v Mayor of London [2003] EMLR 4, CA 129

    • Lonrho plc v Al-Fayed (No 5) [1993] 1 WLR 1489, CA 163

    • Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No 2) [2002] QB 783, CA 85, 97, 189, 216, 258, 271, 273, 276

    • Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No 4) [2001] EMLR 38 111, 112

    • Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No 6) [2002] EWHC 2490 111, 175, 191, 192, 195

    • Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 44 257

    • Lowe v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2007] 2 WLR 595 47

    • Lownds v Home Office (Practice Note) [2002] 1 WLR 2450, CA 249

    • Lukowiak v Unidad Editorial SA [2001] EMLR 46 111, 112, 175

    • Lynch v Knight (1861) 9 HLC 577 29

    • Lyon v Daily Telegraph [1943] 1 KB 746, CA 58

    • Mahfouz v Brisard [2004] EWHC 1735; [2006] EWHC 1191 257, 258

    • Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (in liquidation) [1998] AC 20, HL 231

    • Manchester Corp v Williams [1891] 1 QB 94 28

    • Mark v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No 1) [2002] EMLR 38, CA 47

    • Matadeen v Associated Newspapers Ltd (QBD; 17 March 2005) 252

    • McCartan Turkington Breen (A Firm) v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 277, HL 46, 48, 75, 80, 83, 98

    • McKeith v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2005] EMLR 32 175

    • McKennitt v Ash [2006] EMLR 178; [2007] 3 WLR 194, CA 122, 133, 134, 137, 146, 151, 281

    • McManus v Beckham [2002] 1 WLR 2982 187

    • Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No 1) [2004] EMLR 33 111, 175

    • Milne v Express Newspapers (No 1) [2004] EMLR 24, CA 187, 258

    • Mitchell v Evening Chronicle [2003] EWHC 1281 112, 175, 199

    • Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 1239, HL 40, 231

    • Murray v Express Newspapers plc [2007] EWHC 1908 136

    • Nail v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2005] EMLR 257; [2005] EMLR 12, CA 155, 241, 244, 258, 274, 285

      • (p. xxiv )

    • O'shea v MGN Ltd [2001] EMLR 40 47

    • OBG Ltd v Allan [2007] 2 WLR 920, HL 134

    • Paddick v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2003] EWHC 2991 122, 123

    • Pamplin v Express Newspapers Ltd [1988] 1 WLR 116, CA 62

    • Parmiter v Coupland (1840) 6 M & W 105 18, 101, 105

    • Prolife Alliance v BBC [2002] 3 WLR 1080, CA 66

    • Prudential Assurance Co v Knott [1874] P 184 28

    • R (Ford) v Press Complaints Commission [2002] EMLR 5 143

    • R (on the application of Rusbridger) v Attorney-General [2004] 1 AC 357, HL 66

    • R v Advertising Standards Authority, ex p Vernons Organisation Ltd [1992] 1 WLR 1289 61

    • R v BBC, ex p Prolife Alliance [2004] 1 AC 185, HL 66, 88

    • R v Lambert [2002] 2 AC 545, HL 283

    • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Daly [2001] 2 AC 532, HL 45

    • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, HL 45, 58

    • R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247, HL 48, 66

    • Rantzen v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [1994] QB 670, CA 46, 243

    • Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127, HL 1, 2, 7, 9, 15, 21, 22, 33, 36, 38, 46–8, 60, 64, 72–5, 83, 85, 86, 93, 97, 98, 100, 108–13, 123, 135, 139, 142, 147, 155, 157, 174–6, 178, 182, 186, 188, 190–3, 195, 201, 203, 207, 210, 219, 222, 245, 259, 262, 263, 278, 281–4

    • Roberts v Gable [2007] EMLR 16, CA 60, 111, 174, 193

    • Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129, HL 223, 226

    • S, Re (a child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593, HL 9, 48, 170

    • Scott v Sampson (1881–82) LR 8 QBD 491, CA 18, 231

    • Shevill v Presse Alliance SA [1996] AC 959, HL; [1995] 2 AC 18, ECJ 30

    • Sim v Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237, HL 18

    • Skrine & Co v Euromoney Publications plc [2001] EMLR 16 76

    • South Hetton Coal Co Ltd v North-Eastern News Association Ltd [1894] 1 QB 133, CA 28, 105

    • Stanhope v Blith (1585) 4 Co Rep 15a 231

    • Steel v McDonald's Corporation (Court of Appeal; 31 March 1999) 85, 86, 147, 157, 159, 171, 173, 225

    • Stephens v Avery [1988] 1 Ch 449 148

    • Sun Life Assurance v WH Smith (1934) 150 LT 211 213

    • Sutcliffe v Pressdram Ltd [1991] 1 QB 153, CA 222

    • Telnikoff v Matusevitch [1992] AC 343, HL 58

    • Theakston v MGN [2002] EMLR 22 131

    • Tierney v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2006] EWHC 3275 252

    • Tillery Valley Foods v Channel Four Television, Corporation [2004] EWHC 1075 269

    • Toogood v Spyring (1834) 1 CM & R 181 71, 98

    • Tsikata v Newspaper Publishing plc [1995] EMLR 8; [1997] EMLR 117, CA 98

    • Turcu v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2005] EWHC 799 252

    • Turner v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 3469, CA 231, 258

    • Venables v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2001] Fam 430 48

    • Villiers v Monsley (1769) 2 Wilson 403 18

    • Vizetelly v Mudie's Library [1900] 2 QB 170, CA 187, 213

    • W v Westminster CC [2005] 1 FCR 39 274, 277

    • Wainwright v Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406, HL 5

    • Wason v Walter (1868) LR 4 QB 73 97

      • (p. xxv )

    • Watkins v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 2 AC 395, HL 226

    • Webb v Times Publishing Co [1960] 2 QB 535 108

    • Woodward v Hutchings [1977] 1 WLR 760, CA 129

    • X v Persons Unknown [2007] EMLR 10 133, 152

    • Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Ltd (1934) 50 TLR 581, CA 18

  • South Africa

    • ABB Automation (Pty) Ltd v Scouten [2004] JOL 12768 (W) 87

    • African National Congress v Inkatha Freedom Party [1999] 3 All SA 47 (W) 100

    • Allie v Foodworld Stores Distribution Centre (Pty) Ltd 2004 (2) SA 433 (SCA) 106, 153

    • Anglo Platinum Ltd v Spoor [2007] JOL 18963 (T) 61, 62, 101

    • Argus Printing & Publishing Co v Esselen's Estate 1994 (2) SA 1 (A) 49

    • Benson v Robinson & Co (Pty) Ltd 1967 (1) SA 420 (A) 72

    • Bernstein v Bester NO 1996 (2) SA 751 (CC) 23, 126

    • Bogoshi v National Media Ltd 1996 (3) SA 78 (W) 160

    • Botha v Pretoria Printing Works Ltd 1906 TS 710 31, 32, 36, 105

    • Buthelezi v South African Broadcasting Corporation [1998] 1 All SA 147 (D) 105

    • Case v Minister of Safety and Security 1996 (3) SA 617 (CC) 56, 126

    • Channing v South African Financial Gazette 1966 (3) SA 470 (W) 19

    • Crawford v Albu 1917 AD 102 48, 101

    • Dawood v Minister of Home Affairs 2000 (3) SA 936 (CC) 24

    • De Lange v Costa 1989 (2) SA 857 (A) 101

    • Dhlomo v Natal Newspapers 1989 (1) SA 945 (A) 28

    • Dikoko v Mokhatla 2006 (6) SA 235 (CC) 28, 37, 38, 41, 227, 241, 243, 246, 260, 263, 270, 281

    • Du Plessis v De Klerk 1996 (3) SA 850 (CC) 6, 285

    • Fose v Minister of Safety and Security 1997 (3) SA 786 (CC) 227, 235

    • Graham v Ker (1892) 9 SC 185 106

    • Greeff v Protection 4 You (Pty) Ltd (Pretoria High Court; 9 March 2007) 127, 138

    • Hardaker v Phillips 2005 (4) SA 515 (SCA) 58

    • Hoffmann v South African Airways 2001 (1) SA 1 (CC) 259

    • Holomisa v Argus Newspapers Ltd 1996 (2) SA 588 (W) 4, 7, 8, 49, 50, 68, 140, 168, 202, 210

    • Huey Extreme Club v McDonald t/a Sport Helicopters 2005 (1) SA 485 (C) 127

    • Independent Newspapers Holdings Ltd v Suliman 2005 (7) BCLR 641 (SCA) 106, 122, 153

    • Investigating Dictatorate: Serious Economic Offences v Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd; Re Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd v Smit NO 2001 (1) SA 545 (CC) 25, 29, 126

    • Isaacs v Independent Newspaper Group (Pty) Ltd (Johannesburg High Court; 8 November 2000) 160, 166

    • Jansen van Vuuren NO v Kruger 1993 (4) SA 842 (A) 127

    • Khumalo v Holomisa 2002 (5) SA 401 (CC) 2, 3, 6, 8, 15, 24, 38, 50, 55, 83, 87, 89, 159, 160, 161, 164, 167, 169, 173, 196, 210, 211, 280

    • Kietzman v Kruger [2002] JOL 10166 (T) 179

    • Lady Agasim-Pereira v Johnnic Publishing Eastern Cape (Pty) Ltd [2003] 2 All SA 416 (SE) 197

    • Laugh It Off Promotions CC v South African Breweries International (Finance) BV t/a Sabmark International 2006 (1) SA 144 (CC) 77, 145, 239, 240, 250

      • (p. xxvi )

    • Lekota v Tsedu (Johannesburg High Court; 11 May 2007) 247

    • Liberthal v Primedia Broadcasting (Pty) Ltd 2003 (5) SA 39 (W) 62

    • Magajane v Chairperson, North West Gambling Board 2006 (5) SA 250 (CC) 126

    • Mandela v Falati 1995 (1) SA 251 (W) 61, 76, 101

    • Mangope v Asmal 1997 (4) SA 277 (T) 68, 100

    • Manyatshe v Mail & Guardian Ltd (Johannesburg High Court; 25 April 2007) 77, 107

    • Marais v Groenewald 2001 (1) SA 634 (T) 33, 41, 87, 93, 233, 246

    • May v Udwin 1981 (1) SA (A) 187

    • McKay v Editor, City Press [2002] 1 All SA 539 (SE) 115, 179, 246

    • MEC for Health, Mpumulanga v M-Net 2002 (6) SA 714 (T) 127

    • Midi Television (Pty) Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions (Western Cape) 2007 (9) BCLR 958 (SCA) 8, 89, 259

    • Mineworkers Investment Co (Pty) Ltd v Modibane 2002 (6) SA 512 (W) 259, 260, 270, 281

    • Mistry v Interim Medical and Dental Council of South Africa 1998 (4) SA 1127 (CC) 126

    • Mogale v Seima [2005] JOL 16040 (SCA) 33, 101, 227, 246

    • Mohamed v Jassiem 1996 (1) SA 673 (A) 18

    • Mthembi-Mahanyele v Mail & Guardian Ltd 2002 (12) BCLR 1323 (W); 2004 (6) SA 329 (SCA) 24, 31, 40, 60, 74, 87, 100, 115, 155, 172, 180, 181, 196, 197, 205, 259, 281, 284

    • National Media Ltd v Bogoshi 1998 (4) SA 1196 (SCA) 7, 12, 24, 33, 49, 72, 73, 84, 86, 87, 92, 104, 114, 115, 139, 160, 195, 201, 278, 281

    • Naylor v Jansen 2007 (1) SA 16 (SCA) 263

    • Neethling v Du Preez 1994 (1) SA 708 (A) 72, 113, 159, 171, 172

    • NM v Smith 2007 (5) SA 250 (CC) 41, 77, 92, 123, 181, 196, 208, 252–4, 281

    • O’Keeffe v Argus 1954 (3) SA 244 (C) 38

    • Pakendorf v De Flamingh 1982 (3) SA 146 (A) 73, 86, 195

    • Payne v Republican Press (Pty) Ltd 1980 (2) PH J44 109 32

    • Phillips v Director of Public Prosecutions 2003 (4) BCLR 357 (CC) 8

    • Pienaar v Argus Printing and Publishing Co Ltd 1956 (4) SA 310 (W) 31, 49

    • Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers 2005 (1) SA 217 (CC) 37

    • Positioning Corporate Underwriters & Insurance Consultants (Pty) Ltd v Mail & Guardian Ltd 2005 (6) SA 394 (T) 81

    • President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union 2000 (1) SA 1 (CC) 147

    • Pretoria University v South Africans for the Abolition of Vivisection 2007 (3) SA 395 (O) 260, 270

    • Prinsloo v RCP Media Ltd t/a Rapport 2003 (4) SA 456 (T) 127, 128, 138

    • Roberts v Johncom Media Investments Ltd [2007] JOL 19012 (C) 106, 112, 115, 179, 197

    • S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC) 35

    • S v Mamabolo 2001 (3) SA 409 (CC) 49, 50

    • S v Turrell 1973 (1) SA 248 (C) 49

    • Sayed v Editor, Cape Times 2004 (1) SA 58 (C) 115, 179, 196

    • Selemela v Independent Newspaper Group 2001 (4) SA 987 (NC) 160

    • Sensational Charters CC v Krull [2005] JOL 13919 (N) 87

    • Sokhulu v New African Publications Ltd 2001 (4) SA 1357 (W) 39

    • South African Associated Newspapers Ltd v Shoeman 1962 (2) SA 613 (A) 18

    • South African Associated Newspapers Ltd v Yutar 1969 (2) SA 442 (A) 227

    • South African Broadcasting Corporation v National Director of Public Prosecutions 2007 (1) SA 523 (CC) 58, 83

      • (p. xxvii )

    • South African National Defence Union v Minister of Defence 1999 (4) SA 469 (CC) 58, 67

    • Speaker of the National Assembly v De Lille 1999 (4) SA 863 (SCA) 69

    • Spoorbond v South African Railways 1946 AD 999 28, 48, 68, 100

    • Suid-Afrikaanse Uitsaaikorporasie v O'Malley 1977 (3) SA 394 (A) 86, 188

    • Times Media v Franki Africa (Pty) Ltd (Johannesburg High Court;2 August 2000) 25, 160, 163

    • Trimble v Central News Agency Ltd 1934 AD 43 213

    • Tschilas v Touch Line Media (Pty) Ltd 2004 (2) SA 112 (W) 87

    • Tshabalala-Msimang v Makhanya (Johannesburg High Court; 30 August 2007) 128, 149

    • Van der Berg v Coopers & Lybrand Trust (Pty) Ltd 2001 (2) SA 242 (SCA) 97, 243

    • Van Niekerk v Radebe (Johannesburg High Court; Case No 2000/21813) 259

    • Van Zyl v Jonathan Ball Publishers (Pty) Ltd 1999 (4) SA 571 (W) 76, 106, 259

    • Vengtas v Nydoo 1963 (4) SA 358 (D) 187

    • Young v Shaik [2003] JOL 12113 (C) 259

    • Zillie v Johnson 1984 (2) SA 186 (W) 113

  • European Court of Human Rights

    • A v UK (2003) 36 EHRR 51 97

    • Affaire Radio France v France [2004] ECHR 126 22, 275

    • Barfod v Denmark (1991) 13 EHRR 493 114

    • Bergens Tidende v Norway (2001) 31 EHRR 16 46, 59, 83, 93, 113, 194

    • Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v Norway (2000) 29 EHRR 125 46, 74, 113, 194

    • Busuoic v Moldova (2006) 42 EHRR 14 59, 194

    • Castells v Spain (1992) 14 EHRR 445 102

    • Chauvy v France (2005) 41 EHRR 29, 22, 271

    • Craxi v Italy (No 2) (2004) 38 EHRR 47 137

    • Cumpănă and Măzare v Romania (2005) 41 EHRR 14, 22

    • Editions Plon v France (2006) 42 EHRR 36 136

    • Fayed v UK (1994) 18 EHRR 393 102

    • Grinberg v Russia (2006) 43 EHRR 45 101

    • Handyside v UK (1976) 1 EHRR 737 77

    • Independent News and Media v Ireland (2006) 42 EHRR 46 242, 243

    • Janowski v Poland (2000) 29 EHRR 705 32

    • Jerusalem v Austria (2003) 37 EHRR 25 69

    • Karhuvaara v Finland (2005) 41 EHRR 51 137

    • Krone Verlag GmbH & Co KG v Austria (2003) 36 EHRR 57 101

    • Lingens v Austria (1986) 8 EHRR 407 33, 59, 68, 101

    • Lombardo v Malta (European Court of Human Rights; 24 April 2007) 68, 102

    • Lopes Gomes da Silva v Portugal (2002) 34 EHRR 56 101

    • McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22 158, 159, 267

    • Nikowitz v Austria [2007] EMLR 8 113

    • Nilsen and Johnsen v Norway (2000) 30 EHRR 878 47

    • Observer and Guardian v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 153 257

    • Peck v UK (2003) 36 EHRR 41 137, 152

    • Sciacca v Italy (2006) 43 EHRR 20 137

    • Selistö v Finland (2006) 42 EHRR 8 60, 113, 194, 259

    • Steel & Morris v UK (2005) 41 EHRR 22 86, 91, 94, 102, 158, 173, 225, 245, 253

    • Tammer v Estonia (2003) 37 EHRR 43 114, 152

    • Thoma v Luxembourg (2003) 36 EHRR 21 102

    • Times Newspapers Ltd v UK (European Court of Human Rights; 11 October 2005) 177, 195

    • Tolstoy Miloslavsky v UK (1995) 20 EHRR 442 243, 250, 280

      • (p. xxviii )

    • Tonsbergs Bladas and Haukom v Norway (European Court of Human Rights; 1 March 2007) 114

    • Ukrainian Media Group v Ukraine (2006) 43 EHRR 25 101

    • Von Hannover v Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1 23, 136, 151, 281

    • White v Sweden [2007] EMLR 1, ECtHR 22

    • Wirtschafts-Trend Zeitschriften-Verlagsgesellschaft MBH (No 3) v Austria (European Court of Human Rights; 13 December 2005) 114

  • Australia

    • Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden [2002] NSWCA 419 198, 199

    • APLA Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (2005) 219 ALR 403 117

    • Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 28, 57, 116, 123, 140, 149, 154

    • Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46 76, 80, 281

    • Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106 51

    • Ballina Shire Council v Ringland (1994) 33 NSWLR 680 68, 100

    • Bellino v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1996) 185 CLR 183 104

    • Brander v Ryan [2000] SASC 446 199

    • Buddhist Society, of Western Australia Inc v Bristile Ltd [2000] WASCA 210 87

    • Carson v John Fairfax and Sons Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 44 223, 243

    • Chappell v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 153 107, 108

    • Conservation Council of SA Inc v Chapman (2003) 87 SASR 62 117

    • Dow Jones & Co v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575 16, 18, 30, 281

    • Grosse v Purvis [2003] QDC 151 123

    • Hepburn v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [1983] 2 NSWLR 682 19

    • Herald & Weekly Times Ltd v Popovic [2003] VSCA 161 117, 224

    • Jane Doe v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2007] VCC 281 123

    • John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v O'shane [2005] NSWCA 164 117

    • Kalaba v Commonwealth [2004] FCA 763 123

    • Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 6, 10, 15, 32, 36, 52, 64, 84, 87, 93, 116, 155, 169, 178, 179, 197, 199, 201, 207, 211, 278, 281, 284

    • Mutch v Sleeman (1928) 29 SR (NSW) 125 107

    • Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1 51

    • New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council v Jones (1998) 43 NSWLR 300 68

    • Peek v Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd [2006] 94 SASR 196 117

    • Roberts v Bass (2002) 194 ALR 161 87, 93, 187

    • Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2003) 216 CLR 327 27, 198, 222, 235, 243

    • Singleton v Ffrench (1986) 5 NSWLR 425 162

    • Stephens v West Australian Newspapers Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 211 51

    • Theophanous v The Herald & Weekly Times Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 104 51, 52, 116, 178, 179, 203

    • Thompson v ACTV (1996) 186 CLR 574 213

    • Traill v Australian Broadcasting Commission [1988] Tas R 1 107

  • USA

    • Abrams v United States 250 US 616 (1919) 57

    • Anderson v Liberty Lobby, Inc 477 US 242 (1986) 204

    • Ann-Margret v High Society Magazine Inc 498 F Supp 401 (1980) 124

    • Barr v Matteo 360 US 564 (1959) 70

    • Barrett v Rosenthal (Supreme Court of California; 20 November 2006) 215, 218

      • (p. xxix )

    • Bartnicki v Vopper 532 US 514 (2001) 125, 153

    • Blumenthal v Drudge 922 F Supp 44 (D DC, 1998) 215

    • BMW of North America Inc v Gore 517 US 559 (1996) 238

    • Branzburg v Hayes 408 US 665 (1972) 690 89

    • Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc v West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources 532 US 598 (2001) 247

    • Burnett v National Enquirer Inc 144 Cal App 3d 991 (1983) 103, 146

    • Carson v Allied News Co 529 F 2d 206 (7th Cir 1976) 103, 146

    • City of Chicago v Tribune Co 139 NE 86 (Ill 1923) 68, 100

    • Coleman v MacLennan 78 Kan 711, 98 (1908) 102

    • Connick v Myers 461 US 138 (1983) 120, 153

    • Cox Broadcasting v Cohn 420 US 469 (1975) 84, 124

    • Cubby Inc v Compuserve, Inc 776 F Supp 135 (DC NY) (1991) 217

    • Curtis Publishing Co v Butts 388 US 130 (1967) 12, 102, 103, 161

    • Doe v Cahill 884 A.2d 451 (Delaware Supreme Court; 2005) 19

    • Dun & Bradstreet Inc v Greenmoss Builders Inc 472 US 749 (1985) 12, 25, 26, 30, 53, 71, 76, 79, 87, 88, 102, 120, 121, 141, 200, 202, 228, 230, 241, 278

    • Dworkin v Hustler Magazine Inc 867 F 2d 1188 (CA 9th Cir 1989) 121

    • Florida Star v BJF 491 US 524 (1989) 124

    • Garrison v Louisiana 379 US 64 (1964) 71, 119, 161

    • Gertz v Robert Welch Inc 418 US 323 (1974) 8, 9, 12, 15, 25, 26, 29, 38, 59, 71, 76, 87, 102, 119, 120, 141, 168, 200, 207, 227, 228, 230, 237, 238, 264

    • Gilbert v Medical Economics Co 665 F 2d 305 (CA 10th Cir 1981) 124

    • Hustler Magazine v Falwell 485 US 46 (1988) 59, 67, 125

    • Hutchinson v Proxmire 443 US 111 (1979) 146

    • Lovell v City of Grifin 303 US 444 (1938) 90

    • Martin Marietts Corp v Evening Star Newspaper Co 417 F Supp 947 (DDC 1976) 28

    • Masson v New Yorker Magazine Inc 501 US 496 (1991) 200

    • McIntyre v Ohio Elections Commission 514 US 334 (1995) 217

    • Miami Herald v Tornillo 418 US 241 (1974) 261

    • Michaels v Internet Entertainment Group Inc 5 F Supp 2d 823 (CD Cal 1998) 125

    • Milkovich v Lorain Journal Co 497 US 1 (1990) 69, 88

    • Mills v Alabama 384 US 214 (1966) 81, 84

    • MMAR Group Inc v Dow Jones & Co (1997) (unreported) 238

    • Monitor Patriot Co v Roy 401 US 265 (1971) 119

    • Near v Minnesota 283 US 697 (1931) 76, 260

    • New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964) 7–9, 12, 40, 54, 60, 70, 84, 87, 91, 100, 102, 118, 125, 155, 161, 168, 172, 186, 199, 201–4, 217, 233, 247, 248, 264, 278

    • New York Times v US 403 US 713 (1971) 81, 260

    • Ocala Star-Banner Co v Damron 401 US 295 (1971) 205

    • Palko v Connecticut 302 US 319 (1937) 53

    • Paul v Davis 424 US 693 (1976) 26

    • Pell v Procunier 417 US 817 (1974) 89

    • Philadelphia Newspapers Inc v Hepps 475 US 767 (1986) 7, 12, 58, 71, 88, 102, 120, 161–3, 167, 168

    • Red Lion Broadcasting Co v Federal Communications Commission 248 US 89 (1969) 89, 269

    • Rosanova v Playboy Enterprises Inc 411 F Supp 440 (DC Ga 1976) 119

      • (p. xxx )

    • Rosenblatt v Baer 383 US 75 (1966) 25, 36, 103

    • Rosenbloom v Metromedia 403 US 29 (1971) 119, 141, 146

    • Sharon v Time Inc 609 F Supp 1291 (SDNY 1984) 172

    • Sidis v FR Publishing Corp 113 F 2d 806 (CA 2d Cir 1940) 124

    • Siegert v Gilley 500 US 226 (1991) 26

    • Sipple v Chronicle Publishing Co 201 Cal Rptr 665 (Cal App 1st Dist 1984) 124

    • Smith v California 361 US 147 (1959) 216

    • Smith v Daily Mail Publishing Co 443 US 97 (1979) 124

    • St Amandt v Thompson 390 US 727 (1968) 200

    • Telnikoff v Matusevitch 347 Md 561 (1997) 3

    • Thornhill v Alabama 310 US 88 (1940) 96 67, 139

    • Time Inc v Firestone 424 US 448 (1976) 119

    • Time Inc v Hill 385 US 374 (1967) 123

    • Whitney v California 274 US 357 (1927) 53, 60, 78, 125

    • Zeran v America Online, Inc 129 F 3d 327 (4th Cir 1997) 215, 217

  • Other

    • Afrika v Metzler 1997 (4) SA 531 (NmH) 32, 224

    • Aubry v Èditions Vice-Versa [1998] 1 SCR 591 136

    • Austin v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1986] AC 299, PC 201

    • Bank of British Columbia v Canadian Broadcasting Corp (1993) 108 DLR (4th) 178; (1995) 126 DLR (4th) 644 91, 162

    • Benjamin v The Honourable Minister of Information & Broadcasting [2001] 1 WLR 1040 PC 88

    • Bonnick v Morris [2002] UKPC 31; [2003] 1 AC 300, PC 22, 73, 85, 111, 175, 190, 211

    • Buchanan v Jennings [2005] 1 AC 115, PC 69, 145

    • Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd [1979] 1 SCR 1067 69

    • Derrickson v Tomat (1992) 88 DLR (4th) 401 37, 247

    • Gleaner Co Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628, PC 222, 223, 243, 244, 262

    • Hector v A-G of Antigua and Barbuda [1990] 2 AC 312, PC 66

    • Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto [1995] 2 SCR 1130; (1995) 126 DLR (4th) 129, SCC 3, 15, 22, 37, 38, 203, 224

    • Hosking v Runting [2005] 1 NZLR 1 123, 136, 142

    • Hunter v Gerald Duckworth & Co Ltd [2003] IEHC 81 203

    • Lange v Atkinson [1998] 3 NZLR 424; [2000] 1 NZLR 257, PC 264 37, 44, 74, 100, 117, 153, 177, 189, 207, 208

    • Mahon v Post Publications Ltd t/a The Sunday Business Post [2007] 1 ESC 15 131

    • Mephisto 30 BVerfGE 173 (1971) 24

    • Panday v Gordon [2006] 1 AC 427, PC 74, 190, 211

    • Posts and Telecommunications Corp v Modus Publications (Pvt) Ltd 1998 (3) SA 1114 (ZSC) 99

    • Pressler v Lethbridge (1998) 153 DLR (4th) 537 162

    • Rajagopal v State of Tamil Nadu (1994) 6 SCC 632 203

    • Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 31 187

    • TV3 Network v Eveready New Zealand Ltd [1993] 3 NZLR 435 272

    • Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co [2002] 1 SCR 595; (2002) 209 DLR (4th) 257 (SCC) 224

    • Worme v Commissioner of Police of Grenada [2004] 2 AC 430, PC 236