Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
International Law and EmpireHistorical Explorations$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Martti Koskenniemi, Walter Rech, and Manuel Jiménez Fonseca

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780198795575

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2017

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795575.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 24 October 2017

Scepticism of the Civilizing Mission in International Law

Scepticism of the Civilizing Mission in International Law

Chapter:
(p.359) 15 Scepticism of the Civilizing Mission in International Law
Source:
International Law and Empire
Author(s):

Andrew Fitzmaurice

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795575.003.0016

The ‘standard of civilization’ dominated nineteenth-century positivists’ accounts of international law. The association of the idea of civilization with progress has broad appeal, and the concept continues to animate discussions of international conduct today. This chapter focuses on the history of opposition to this idea, and with scepticism and ambivalence concerning a standard of civilization as the basis for an international law of nations XE “jus gentium:based on the standard of civilization”. Nineteenth-century scepticism is particularly addressed because during this period positivism XE “positivism” in hand with nationalism XE “nationalism:connection to positivism” brought the Eurocentrism in international law and the civilizing mission to a peak and nourished a new wave of imperialism. Some jurists both rejected the civilizing mission and critiqued empire. Other critics did not oppose empire and colonization, but nevertheless opposed civilization as a standard of the membership of society of nations. Apart from their shared scepticism of the civilizing mission, these perspectives shared an understanding of empire in terms of interests. The consequences of removing the dichotomy between ‘civilized’ and ‘uncivilized’ and instead understanding international law in terms of interests are explored.

Keywords:   International law, eurocentrism, empire, standard of civilization, progress, positivism, interests, scepticism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .