Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Managing Knowledge Integration Across Boundaries$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Frederik Tell, Christian Berggren, Stefano Brusoni, and Andrew Van de Ven

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780198785972

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2017

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198785972.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

Talking through Objects

Talking through Objects

The Sociopolitical Dynamics embodied in Boundary Objects in Architectural Work

Chapter:
(p.171) Chapter 11 Talking through Objects
Source:
Managing Knowledge Integration Across Boundaries
Author(s):

Dmitrijs Kravcenko

Jacky Swan

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198785972.003.0011

With a few notable exceptions, current literature on boundary objects primarily focuses on how individuals interact around boundary objects in pursuing knowledge integration, with a prevailing assumption that these artefacts allow for an almost harmonious arena for work. Following an in-depth ethnographic study of architectural work, we observe that objects used to integrate knowledge across professional boundaries have existing power relations built into them. Specifically, we note that boundary objects are not ‘blank slate’ devices around which work can be carried out equally, but originate from specific domains of practice thus importing certain restrictions and dispositions of those practices into the work. Our research suggests that boundary objects perform best where power relations are asymmetric, and calls for more attention to be paid to the work done within boundary objects.

Keywords:   boundary objects, knowledge integration, domains of practice, power relations, artefacts, architecture, ethnographic study

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .