This chapter explores the relationship between Anglican historiography and English constitutionalism—the dominant mode of historical thought in the Victorian and Edwardian period. It begins by defining English constitutionalism, and by rejecting its widespread conflation with Herbert Butterfield’s ‘Whig interpretation of history’. It proceeds to show how Anglican historians intertwined their own beliefs with standard constitutionalist views of the historical development of English liberty. In medieval history, this entailed claiming the milestones of constitutional progress, such as Magna Carta or the origins of parliament, for the church, for instance by showing the contribution of the clergy to such developments. The other great constitutionalist epoch—the seventeenth century—was more divisive, since historians’ religious and political sentiments widely diverged. Contrary to some suggestions, the Civil War remained an apple of discord, though Anglican constitutionalists could overcome these differences by focusing on the Glorious Revolution of 1688.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.